|
FULL-TEXT
Paper : Radiological Modifications of the Skeletal System
Among Aluminum Smelter Workers
DIRECTORY: FAN
> Health >
Bone >
Fluorosis
> Industrial
> Runge & Franke 1989
FLUORIDE
October 1989; Volume 22; Pages 157-164
RADIOLOGICAL MODIFICATIONS OF THE SKELETAL SYSTEM AMONG ALUMINUM
SMELTER WORKERS
A 15-Year Retrospective Study
H. Runge* and J. Franke
Halle and Erfurt, GDR
* Department of Othropedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Martin-LutherUniversity,
Halle, GDR.
SUMMARY: Previously by the time
skeletal fluorosis among aluminum smelter workers due to high
fluoride exposure was diagnosed numerous cases of bone fluorosis
had already reached stages II and III according to Roholm. Today,
as a result of improved working conditions and continuous health
care, the picture has changed. This paper reports the frequency
of occurrence of bone changes caused by fluoride in a population
of 358 aluminum smelter workers who had been fluoride exposed
for more than 5 years and whose diagnosis had not been made prior
to 1971. In the examination, particular attention was paid to
degenerative changes of the skeleton and the frequency of spondylosis,
arthrosis of the hip and elbow joints as well as changes in the
form of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis
(spondylosis hypeostotica Forestier). A population of 81 foundry
workers in aluminum smelters under similar working conditions,
but not fluoride exposed, served as controls.
KEY WORDS: Aluminum smelter; Arthritis; Bone changes, radiologically
visible; Fluorosis, skeletal; Foundry workers; Spondylosis.
Introduction
More than 50 years have passed since Moller and Gudjonsson (1) described
fluorosis, a new occupational disease, for the first time. Roholm
(2) subsequently described this disease in detail in cryolite workers.
He divided roentgenologically visible changes into three stages;
Fritz (3) added two prestages (vague symptoms and stage 0-1). In
the fourth to seventh decades of our century description of typical
skeletal fluorosis with distinct sclerosis of the spine and pelvis
and marked formation of appositions at long bones (radius and ulna,
as well as tibia and fibula) in the range of the lower legs and
forearms played a central role. In recent years, reports on less
distinct fluorosis cases is increasing (4-12), in which hyperostosis
at the spine and bone appositions at muscular and ligamental attachments
dominate. Also Carnow and Conibear
(13) concluded from a study of 1242 aluminum smelter workers that
fluoride exposures were related to a history of musculo-skeletal
diseases and other abnormalities in the absence of radiologically
apparent skeletal fluorosis. They suggested that non-specific changes
could comprise an early stage of fluorosis.
In view of these facts we examined carefully about 500 aluminum
smelter workers of an aluminum factory near Halle with respect to
roentgenological symptoms. Previously Franke et al. (14) and Specht
(15) had classified all cases of fluorosis of the same factory,
which had occurred up to the early 1970s. Thus in this paper only
those workers are included whose disease had begun during the last
15 years (1971-1986) who have been fluoride-exposed for more than
5 years.
This group of 358 aluminum smelter workers was compared with the
fluoride-exposed subjects examined by Specht (15) taking into consideration
exposure time, age when starting the occupation and age when the
disease began.
Materials and Methods
The roentgenograms of 358 aluminum smelters, having been fluoride-exposed
for more than 5 years were analysed. X-ray photographs were available
of the thoracic and lumbar spine at two levels, of the pelvic region
ap. and lateral, of the forearms with elbow and of the lower legs
ap. and laterally with the knee joint. Moreover, in the course of
the last two years lateral x-ray photographs of the heel bone of
all aluminum smelter workers were registered by screening. According
to the health-care program for fluorideexposed persons in the G.D.R.,
the above-mentioned x-ray photographs are taken every four years.
In addition, workers are thoroughly examined clinically. A population
of 81 foundry workers from different factories of the G.D.R. (in
Halle and Karl-Marx-Stadt) served as controls. They worked under
similar conditions as well as under the influence of extreme heat,
without being exposed to fluoride. Their ages were approximately
the same as the aluminum smelter workers (49.2 yrs ±6.87 for the
workers in the foundry and 47.5 years ±10.14 for workers in aluminum
smelters) particularly important in connection with the assessment
of the frequency of various degenerative skeletal symptoms.
Results
Table 1 shows the frequency in percent (%) of the various stages
of fluorosis in three different groups of fluoride -exposed subjects.
Whereas Fritz (3) carried out his examinations in cryolite workers,
Specht (15) and we investigated aluminum smelter workers of the
same factories near Halle.
Table 1.
Frequency (%) of Various Stages of Fluorosis in Three Different
Fluoride-Exposed Groups.
|
| Fluorosis Stage |
Fritz [1958]
(n = 156) |
Specht [1975]
(n = 300) |
Runge [1986]
(n = 358) |
| No Changes |
53.2 |
21.6 |
73.5 |
| Vague Symptoms |
4.7 |
32.7 |
7.8 |
| 0-I |
17.6 |
17.3 |
7.8 |
| I |
13.6 |
16.0 |
5.3 |
| I-II |
- |
7.0 |
3.9 |
| II |
5.7 |
2.3 |
0.6 |
| II-III |
- |
2.3 |
1.1 |
| III |
5.2 |
0.8 |
- |
| Table
2.
Mean Fluoride Exposure (Years) for Developing Fluorosis. |
| Fluorosis Stage |
Fritz [1958] |
Specht [1975]
(mean/range) |
Runge [1986]
(mean/range) |
| No Changes |
- |
9.7 (0-20) |
19.9 (5-35) |
| Vague Symptoms |
11 |
12.8 (2-23) |
19.2 (10-37) |
| 0-I |
12-13 |
14.1 (5-33) |
22.6 (10-20) |
| I |
12-26 |
15.0 (6-36) |
21.1 (10-43) |
| I-II |
- |
17.2 (12-27) |
21.1 (10-33) |
| II |
21-31 |
17.6 (11-21) |
17.5 (16-19) |
| II-III |
- |
18.9 (14-25) |
21.3 (15-26) |
| III |
23-35 |
19.5 (19-20) |
- |
Fritz found that over 40% of the cases were
suffering from fluorosis stage 0-1 up to stage III; Specht found that
45.7% fell into these groups, whereas in our present examination only
18.7% of fluoride-exposed persons were in these stages. Among Specht's
patients only 21.6% showed no fluoridecaused changes of the skeleton,
in other words he found 73.5% without skeletal changes.
Table 2 shows medium fluoride-exposure time leading to fluorosis,
in comparison with examinations by Fritz and Specht. According to
this table the time leading to fluorosis stage I, II or III is longer,
on the average, in Fritz's than in Specht's workers. In our investigation
it is somewhat longer. Medium exposure time of workers who developed
the disease between 1971 and 1986 does not differ markedly with reference
to the individual stages of fluorosis; it is always around 20 years
without statistical significance, with a range of 10 to 43 years (for
example in stage 1). In Table 3 we did not demonstrate the dependence
on the worker's age when entering the production process or on the
worker's age at the time of diagnosis, nor could exposure time be
related to the development of a certain stage of fluorosis. Therefore
occurrence of bone fluorosis does not depend upon whether the worker
starts working in such a factory at age 20 or at age 40. Nor is duration
of exposure significant, since stages II-III can be demonstrated after
15 years. On the other hand, in some cases, more than 30 years may
be necessary to develop vague symptoms or stage 0-1.
| Table
3.
Worker's Age When Entering Production Process and Age of Diagnosis
(n = 358 Aluminum Smelter Workers with over 5 Years Exposure
Time). |
| Fluorosis
Stage |
|
Age (in Years) |
|
| n |
At Start of Employment
(mean/S.D.) |
At Confirmation of X-ray
Diagnosis (mean/S.D.) |
Duration of Exposure
(mean/S.D.) |
| No Change |
263 |
22.9 + 15.30 |
- |
19.9 + 9.26 |
| Vague Symptoms |
28 |
29.4 + 7.42 |
51.0 + 9.52 |
19.2 + 6.21 |
| 0-I |
28 |
27.9 + 7.07 |
51.5 + 7.40 |
22.6 + 4.96 |
| I |
19 |
32.0 + 8.04 |
53.8 + 9.10 |
21.1 + 7.67 |
| I-II |
14 |
31.6 + 8.27 |
54.6 + 5.68 |
21.1 + 6.40 |
| II |
2 |
32.5 + 12.02 |
50.0 + 9.90 |
17.5 + 2.12 |
| II-III |
4 |
28.3 + 2.36 |
50.5 + 7.33 |
21.3 + 5.19 |
Individual differences in sensitivity to noxious
fluoride seems to be more important. The three tables demonstrate
that it is quite possible to be an aluminum smelter worker for 30
years or longer without showing fluoride caused bone changes, whereas
others develop symptoms of fluorosis after only 10 years; the varying
effect of fluoride has been demonstrated by therapy tests for osteoporosis.
For this reason we examined the causes of this difference in sensitivity
to fluoride by studying the degenerative changes in fluoride-exposed
persons, the frequency of which is illustrated in Figure
1. Spondylosis, elbow and hip joint arthrosis occur more often
in the 95 cases diagnosed as fluorosis. Also, bony appositions at
the epicondyles of the humerous and in the pelvic region occur more
frequently in the fluorosis-group than in the fluoride-exposed subjects
with symptoms of fluorosis. Like Boillat et al. (7) we observed
hyperostosis of the spine or of peripheral skeletal parts in 22
cases, a particular form of fluorosis. The final evidence that the
changes are really fluoride-caused can only be produced by a biopsy
of these areas, a measure not desired by the workers. In the Anglo-American
literature these generalized hyperostoses are referred to as Diffuse
Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostoses (DISH). In Germany and France they
are described as spondylosis hyperostotica or Forestier desease
(16-24). Neither Boillat et al. (5) nor we found differences between
the fluoride-induced hyperostosis and the form which (at a much
lower frequency) can occur spontaneously without external cause
(idiopathic). In our 22 cases, bone density was normal in 12, i.e.
no sclerosis of the spine nor of the pelvis could be identified.
Figure
2 compares the frequency of spondylosis, elbow and hip joint
arthrosis as well as bony appositions in the elbow and pelvic region
of fluoride-exposed aluminum smelter workers to that of iron foundry
workers. The average age of the two groups examined was approximately
the same (47.48 yrs in the fluoride-exposed group; 49.21 yrs in
the controls).
It can be noted that spondylosis, DISH (no case occurred among workers
not exposed to fluoride) as well as bony appositions occurred more
often in aluminum smelter workers. Arthrotic changes of the elbow
joint likewise occurred often, but were more distinctly developed
among aluminum smelter workers; coxarthrosis was found more frequently
in non-fluoride exposed foundry workers than in aluminum smelter
workers. In the majority of these DISH-like cases the hyperostotic
changes in the region of the spine, pelvis, elbow joints and heel
bones, were observed simultaneously with a normal density of the
skeleton.
Discussion
Our study shows that hyperostosis of the spine and peripheral skeletal
parts occurs more frequently among fluoride-exposed aluminum smelter
workers. It is similar to diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis
(or spondylosis hyperostotica Forestier) (16-24). Separation of
the fluoride-caused form from that etiologically unexplained idiopathic
is only possible through bone biopsy. DISH
is accompanied by a disturbance of the vitamin A metabolism (16).
In the literature there are no similar examinations of fluoride
exposed subjects with hyperostosis. As in the 43 aluminum smelter
workers suffering from fluorosis examined by Boillat et al. (6)
we found no pathology in our aluminum smelter workers other than
movement restrictions and cases of asthmoid bronchitis.
Regarding the question raised by Boillat et al. (6) on the role
of physical stress in the development of fluorosis and its osteoarticular
manifestation, we have no final answer. In our patients vertebral
changes even exceeded the 70% of Boillat et al. (6), when DISH-like
hyperostoses of the spine were added. Hyperostotic changes at the
knee joint, which occurred in the reports of the above-mentioned
authors in 43% of cases were found in less than 5% of ours.
In numerous cases, we noted considerable arthrosis of the elbow
joints, recognized as an occupational disease in our country; aluminum
smelter workers are obliged for years to use a steel rod to break
the smelt crust. Boillat et al. (6) reported 0.5-2.3 mg F/m3 in
the air in the electrolysis area. In comparison in the factory where
our patients work the values were partly over 5 mg F/m3 around 1970.
In recent years, air F- was 2.5 mg F/m3. Nevertheless, the formerly
typical sclerosis does not occur as frequently. On the other hand,
skeletal changes similar to degenerative diseases are observed.
Czerwinski and Lankosz (8) who question whether mechanical factors
play a role in developing fluoride-caused bone changes consider
the possibility of synergistic action of fluorine and mechanical
factors. The frequency of vertebral changes could be facilitated
largely by prolonged exposure apart from mechanical factors. Since
the crust breaking equipment was formerly poorly suspended, the
whole body was exposed to considerable shaking, resulting in spondylosis.
Conclusion
In the last 15 years due to improvement in working conditions (new
crust breaking equipment, with a cabin, improvements of suction
devices) and intensive health care, the frequency of fluorosis has
markedly diminished in the factory supervised by us and only incipient
stages of fluorosis are encountered. However, the number of workers
showing degenerative spinal changes beyond the normal level is still
high. As fluoride is largely used in the nickel, copper, coal, gold
and silver industries, in the production of fertilizers, narcotic
gas as well as in the production of steel, iron, glass, ceramics,
enamel and numerous other production processes, the possibility
of developing occupational fluorosis must always be considered.
The total number of American workers potentially exposed to fluorides,
according to the National Institute for Occuapational Safety and
Health (25), is 350,000. Although the severity of industrial fluorosis
is decreasing in some aluminum factories, at present, due to improved
control and working conditions, the danger caused by fluoride is
increasing as its use in industry becomes more extensive.
References
1. Mo11er, I.J. and Gudjonsson, S.V.: Massive Fluorosis of Bones
and Ligaments. Acta Radiol., 13:269-294, 1932.
2. Roholm, K.: Fluorine Intoxication. A Clinical-Hygienic Study.
H.K. Lewis and Co., London, 1937.
3. Fritz, H.: Rontgenpathologische und pathologische Beobachtungen
zum Fluoroseproblem. Med. Habil. Schrift., Dresden, 1958.
4. Boillat, M.A., Rouget, A., Curati, W., Dettwiler, W., Maillard,
J.M., May, P. and Demeurisse, C.: Quelques aspects de la fluorose
industrielle en Suisse. 11: Radiologie et fluor osseux. Arch. mal.
prof., 36:412-420, 1975.
5. Boillat, M.A., Garcia, J., Detwiler, W., Burckbardt, P. and Courvoisier,
B.: Clinical Aspects of Industrial Fluorosis. In: Fluoride and Bone.
B. Courvoisier et al., eds., Berne, Hans- Huber-Verl ag, 1978, pp.
155-162.
6. Boillat, M.A., Baud, C.A., Lagier, R., Garcia, J., Rey, P., Bang,
S., Boivin, G., Demeurisse, C., Goessi, M., Tochon-Danguy, H.H.,
Very, J.M., Burckhardt, P., Voinier, B., Donath, A. and Courvoisier,
B.: Fluorose industrielle. Etude multidisciplinaire de 43 ouvriers
de Findustrie de I'aluminium. Schweiz. Med. Wschr., 109:suppl.8:1-28,
1979.
7. Boillat, M.A., Garcia, J. and Velebit, L.: Radiological Criteria
of Industrial Fluorosis. Skeletal Radiol., 5:161-165, 1980.
8. Czerwinski, E. and Lankosz, W.: Industrial and Endemic Skeletal
Fluorosis. In: Fluoride and Bone. Courvoisier et al, eds., Berne,
Hans-Huber-Verlag, 1978, pp. 144-154.
9. Grandjean, P.: Classical Syndromes in Occupational Medicine.
Occupational Fluorosis through 50 Years. Clinical and Epidemiological
Experience. Am. J. Industr. Med., 3:227-236, 1982.
10. Grandjean, P.: Long-term Significance of Industrial Fluoride
Exposure. A Study of Danish Cryolite Workers. In: Fluoride Toxicity.
Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the ISFR, New Delhi, November
13-17, 1983. Susheela, A.K., ed., New Delhi. All India Institute
of Medical Sciences, 1985, pp. 5-16.
11. Hodge, H.C. and Smith, F.A.: Occupational Fluoride Exposure.
J. Occup. Med., 19:12-29, 1977.
12. Lagier, R.: Pathology of Skeletal Industrial Fluorosis. In:
Fluoride and Bone. Courvoisier et al., eds., Bern, Hans Huber Verlag,
1978, pp. 163-167.
13. Carnow, B.W. and Conibear, S.A.: Musculoskeletal and Respiratory
Diseases in Aluminum Smelter Workers. Arch. Hig. Rad. Toksiko.,
30:967-981, 1979.
14. Franke, I., Rath, F., Runge, H., Fengler, F., Auermann, E. and
Lenart, G.: Industrial Fluorosis. Fluoride, 8:61-85, 1975.
15. Specht, A.: fiber die Bedeutung des Eintrittsalters und der
F luorexposi t ionsdauer far das Aftreten der Knockenfluorose bei
Alum iniumschmel zern des CKB-Bitterfeld. Diplomarbeit, Halle. Martin-Luther-Universit9t,
1975.
16. Abiteboul, M., Lussier, A., Billon, B., Drapeau, G. and Petitcler,
C.: Hyperstose vertebrale et troubles du metabolisme du retinol.
Rev. Rhum., 52:141-143, 1985.
17. Arbiteboul, M., Mazieres, B. and Menard, H.: A propos de deux
nouveaux cas familiaux d'hyperostose vertebral ankylosante. Rev.
Rhum., 52:645-647, 1985.
18. Abiteboul, M., Arlet, J., Sarrabay, M.A., Mazieres, B., and
Thouvenot, J.P.: Etude du metabolisme de la vitamine A au cours
de la maladie hyperostosique de Forestier et Rotes-Querol. Rev.
Rhum., 53:143-145, 1986.
19. Houk, R.W., Hendrix, R.W., Lee, C., Lal, S. and Schmid, F.R.:
Cervical Fracture and Paraplegia Complicating Diffuse Idiopathic
Skeletal Hyperostosis. Arthritis Rheum., 27:472-475, 1984.
20. Lagier, R. and Baud, C.A.: Diffuse Enthesopathic Hyperostosis
- Anatomical and Radiological Study on a Macerated Skeleton. Roe.
Fo., 129:588-597, 1978.
21. Ott, V.R.: Spondylosis hyperostotica. Stuttgart, Enke, 1982.
22.Resnick, D., Shaul, S.R. and Robins, J.M.: Diffuse Idiopathic
Skeletal Hyperostosis (DISH). Forestiers Disease with Extraspinal
Manifestation. Radiology, 115:513-524, 1975.
23. Tsukamoto, Y., Onitsuka, H. and Lee, K.: Radiological Aspects
of Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis of the Spine. Am. J.
Roentgenol., 129:913918, 1977.
24. Yagan, R. and Khan, M.A.: Confusion of Roentgenographic Differential
Diagnosis between Ankylosing Hyperostosis (Forestier's Disease)
and Ankylosing Spondylitis. Clin. Rheumatol., 2:285-292, 1983.
25. NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health)
Recommended Standard for Occupational Exposure to Inorganic Fluoride.
Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare,
1979.
|