Fluoride Action Network

home // News // Assessment of groundwater quality and associated health risk in the arid environment, Western Saudi Arabia. //

Assessment of groundwater quality and associated health risk in the arid environment, Western Saudi Arabia.

Source: Environmental Science and Pollution Research | Authors: Rajmohan N, Masoud MHZ, Niyazi BAM.
Posted on November 5th, 2020
Location: Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Groundwater quality and associated health risk in the arid environment, Rabigh basin, Western Saudi Arabia, was assessed using an integrated approach namely groundwater suitability zone (GWSZ) maps, drinking water quality index (DWQI), irrigation water quality (IWQ) parameters, irrigation water quality index (IWQI), chronic daily index (CDI), and hazard quotient (HQ). Groundwater samples were collected (n = 50) and analysed. Groundwater is alkaline (80%), fresh to brackish, and hard to very hard, and 78% of samples exceeded the international drinking water safe limit. The DWQI indicates that groundwater samples are excellent (24%), good (24%), poor (20%), very poor (10%), and unsuitable (22%) classes for drinking use. Total HQ (HQoral F– + HQoral NO3–) indicated that 68%, 80%, and 72% of samples express non-carcinogenic health threat to adult, children, and infant, respectively, in the study region. IWQ parameters, namely, EC, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), Kelly’s ratio (KR), sodium percentage (Na%), permeability index (PI), and magnesium hazard (MH), suggest that 72%, 66%, 64%, 98%, and 92% of samples have SAR < 6, KR < 1, MH < 50, PI > 25%, and Na% < 60%, respectively, which are suitable for irrigation. USSL classification implies that groundwater is suitable only for salt-tolerant crops and high permeability soil. IWQI values suggest that groundwater in 12%, 82%, and 6% of wells are low, medium, and highly suitable, respectively, for irrigation. Furthermore, only 42% of samples are recommended for livestock uses due to high F– (> 2). GWSZ maps, DWQI, and IWQI imply that groundwater in the upstream region is suitable whereas groundwater in the downstream is not recommended for any uses. Hence, this study recommended proper groundwater augmentation methods to reduce the salinity and improve the water quality in the shallow aquifer in the arid environment. The GWSZ, DWQI, and IWQI maps will aid to identify the suitable zones for groundwater development and sustainable management.

*Original abstract online at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-020-11383-x

References

  1. Abboud IA (2018) Geochemistry and quality of groundwater of the Yarmouk basin aquifer, north Jordan. Environ Geochem Health 40:1405–1435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-017-0064-x

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  2. Abdullah TO, Ali SS, Al-Ansari NA, Knutsson S (2019) Hydrogeochemical evaluation of groundwater and Its suitability for domestic uses in Halabja Saidsadiq Basin, Iraq. Water 11:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar

  3. Adimalla N, Qian H (2019) Groundwater quality evaluation using water quality index (WQI) for drinking purposes and human health risk (HHR) assessment in an agricultural region of Nanganur, south India. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 176:153–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.03.066

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  4. Adimalla N, Li P, Venkatayogi S (2018) Hydrogeochemical evaluation of groundwater quality for drinking and irrigation purposes and integrated interpretation with water quality index studies. Environ Process 5:363–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-018-0297-4

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  5. Alabdula’aly AI, Al-Rehaili AM, Al-Zarah AI, Khan MA (2010) Assessment of nitrate concentration in groundwater in Saudi Arabia. Environ Monit Assess 161:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0722-7

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  6. Al-Ahmadi ME (2012) Interpretation of groundwater quality using factor analysis, Wadi Rabigh area, Western Saudi Arabia. J Environ Hydrol 20:1–12

    Google Scholar

  7. Al-Ahmadi ME (2013) Hydrochemical characterization of groundwater in wadi Sayyah, Western Saudi Arabia. Appl Water Sci 3:721–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-013-0118-x

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  8. Al-Ahmadi ME, El-Fiky AA (2009) Hydrogeochemical evaluation of shallow alluvial aquifer of Wadi Marwani, western Saudi Arabia. J King Saud Univ Sci 21:179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2009.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar

  9. Al-Arifi NS, Al-Agha MR, El-Nahhal YZ (2013) Environmental impact of landfill on groundwater, south east of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J Nat Sci Res 3:118–128

    Google Scholar

  10. Alfaifi HJ, Kahal AY, Abdelrahman K, Zaidi FK, Albassam A, Lashin A (2020) Assessment of groundwater quality in Southern Saudi Arabia: case study of Najran area. Arab J Geosci 13:101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-5109-2

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  11. Al-Oud SS (2008) Impact of municipal and industrial waste on the distribution and accumulation of some heavy metals in sandy soils of Al-Qassim Region at Central of Saudi Arabia. J Environ Sci Technol 1:135–142. https://doi.org/10.3923/jest.2008.135.142

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  12. Alquwaizany AS, Alfadul SM, Khan MA, Alabdulaaly AI (2019) Occurrence of organic compounds in groundwater of Saudi Arabia. Environ Monit Assess 191:601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7723-6

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  13. Al-Shaibani AM (2007) Hydrogeology and hydrochemistry of a shallow alluvial aquifer, western Saudi Arabia. Hydrogeol J 16:155–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-007-0220-y

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  14. Alyamani MS (2007) Effects of cesspool systems on groundwater quality of shallow bedrock aquifers in the recharge area of Wadi Fatimah, Western Arabian Shield, Saudi Arabia. J Environ Hydrol 15:1–11

    Google Scholar

  15. APHA (2017) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC, 22nd

  16. Ayers RS, Westcot DW (1994) Water quality for agriculture, FAO irrigation drainage paper, vol 29(1)

  17. Bamousa AO, El Maghraby M (2016) Groundwater characterization and quality assessment, and sources of pollution in Madinah, Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci 9:536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2554-z

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  18. Basahi JM, Masoud MHZ, Rajmohan N (2018) Effect of flash flood on trace metal pollution in the groundwater-Wadi Baysh Basin, western Saudi Arabia. J Afr Earth Sci 147:338–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2018.06.032

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  19. Bindagji HH (1980) Atlas of Saudi Arabia. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar

  20. Bouteraa O, Mebarki A, Bouaicha F, Nouaceur Z, Laignel B (2019) Groundwater quality assessment using multivariate analysis, geostatistical modeling, and water quality index (WQI): a case of study in the Boumerzoug-El Khroub valley of Northeast Algeria. Acta Geochimica 38:796–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11631-019-00329-x

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  21. Bouwer H (1978) Groundwater hydrology (McGraw-Hill Series in Water Resources and Environmental Engineering Series). McGraw-Hill College

  22. Chowdhury S, Al-Zahrani M (2015) Characterizing water resources and trends of sector wise water consumptions in Saudi Arabia. J King Saud Univ Eng Sci 27:68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2013.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar

  23. DeNicola E, Aburizaiza OS, Siddique A, Khwaja H, Carpenter DO (2015) Climate change and water scarcity: the case of Saudi Arabia. Ann Glob Health 81:342–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2015.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar

  24. Doneen LD (1964) Water quality for agriculture. Department of Irrigation, University of California, Davis

  25. El-Aziz S (2017) Evaluation of groundwater quality for drinking and irrigation purposes in the north-western area of Libya (Aligeelat). Environ Earth Sci 76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6421-3

  26. El-Hames AS, Al-Ahmadi M, Al-Amri N (2011) A GIS approach for the assessment of groundwater quality in Wadi Rabigh aquifer, Saudi Arabia. Environ Earth Sci 63:1319–1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0803-0

    Article  Google Scholar

  27. Elumalai V, Nwabisa DP, Rajmohan N (2019) Evaluation of high fluoride contaminated fractured rock aquifer in South Africa–geochemical and chemometric approaches. Chemosphere 235:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.065

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  28. Fan W, Zhou J, Zhou Y, Zeng Y, Chen Y, Sun Y (2020) Water quality and health risk assessment of shallow groundwater in the southern margin of the Tarim Basin in Xinjiang, P. R. China. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2020.1731680

  29. FAO (2009) Groundwater management in Saudi Arabia. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation

  30. Gharahi N, Zamani-Ahmadmahmoodi R (2020) Evaluation of groundwater quality for drinking purposes: a case study from the Beheshtabad Basin, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province, Iran. Environ Earth Sci 79:82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-8816-9

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  31. Gharbi A, Ali ZI, Zairi M (2019) Groundwater suitability for drinking and agriculture purposes using irrigation water quality index and multivariate analysis: case of Sidi Bouzid aquifer, central Tunisia. Environ Earth Sci 78:692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8733-y

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  32. Ghazavi R, Vali AB, Eslamian S (2012) Impact of flood spreading on groundwater level variation and groundwater quality in an arid environment. Water Resour Manag 26:1651–1663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-9977-4

    Article  Google Scholar

  33. He XD, Li PY, Ji YJ, Wang YH, Su ZM, Vetrimurugan E (2020) Groundwater arsenic and fluoride and associated arsenicosis and fluorosis in China: occurrence, distribution and management. Exposure Health 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-020-00347-8

  34. Hejazi RF (1989) Investigation of leachate from a sanitary landfill in Saudi Arabia. King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals

  35. Kadam A, Wagh V, Umrikar B, Sankhua R (2019) An implication of boron and fluoride contamination and its exposure risk in groundwater resources in semi-arid region, Western India. Environ Dev Sustain 22:7033–7056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00527-w

    Article  Google Scholar

  36. Kebede A, Retta N, Abuye C, Whiting S, Kassaw M, Zeru T, Tessema M, Kjellevold M (2016) Dietary fluoride intake and associated skeletal and dental fluorosis in school age children in rural Ethiopian rift valley. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13:756. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13080756

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  37. Keefe J, Granz D, Maxfield R (2003) Standard operating procedure for groundwater sampling. The Office of Environmental Measurement and Evaluation, EPA, New England e Region 1, 11 Technology Dr North Chelmsford, MA 01863

  38. Kelly WP (1957) Adsorbed sodium, cation exchange capacity and percentage sodium adsorption in alkali soils. Science 84:473–477

    Google Scholar

  39. Khan R, Jhariya DC (2017) Groundwater quality assessment for drinking purpose in Raipur city, Chhattisgarh using water quality index and geographic information system. J Geol Soc India 90:69–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-017-0665-0

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  40. Li Y, Wang F, Feng J et al (2020) Health risk in children to fluoride exposure in a typical endemic fluorosis area on Loess Plateau, north China, in the last decade. Chemosphere 243:8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125451

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  41. Ma L, Abuduwaili J, Li Y, Uulu SA, Mu S (2019) Hydrochemical characteristics and water quality assessment for the upper reaches of Syr Darya River in Aral Sea Basin, Central Asia. Water 11:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091893

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  42. Mahaqi A, Moheghi MM, Mehiqi M, Moheghy MA (2018) Hydrogeochemical characteristics and groundwater quality assessment for drinking and irrigation purposes in the Mazar-i-Sharif city, North Afghanistan. Appl Water Sci 8:133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0768-9

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  43. Manikandan E, Rajmohan N, Anbazhagan S (2020) Monsoon impact on groundwater chemistry and geochemical processes in the shallow hard rock aquifer. Catena 195:104766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104766

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  44. Mansour NM (2020) Hydrochemical studies and evaluation of groundwater quality of the Quaternary aquifer at Faquss, Al Sharqiya Governorate, Egypt. Sustain Water Resour Manag 6:19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-020-00374-y

    Article  Google Scholar

  45. Masoud M (2015) Rainfall-runoff modeling of ungauged Wadis in arid environments (case study Wadi Rabigh—Saudi Arabia). Arab J Geosci 8:2587–2606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1404-0

    Article  Google Scholar

  46. Masoud MHZ, Basahi JM, Rajmohan N (2018) Impact of flash flood recharge on groundwater quality and its suitability in the Wadi Baysh Basin, Western Saudi Arabia: an integrated approach. Environ Earth Sci 77:395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7578-0

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  47. McCarty MF (2004) Should we restrict chloride rather than sodium? Med Hypotheses 63:138–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2003.11.005

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  48. Moore TA, Al-Rehalie MH (1989) Geologic map of the Makkah Quadrangle, Sheet 21D. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Ministry of Petroleum and Mineral Resources

  49. MoWE (2014) National water strategy: to supply and protect the Kingdom’s most precious natural resource. Ministry of Water and Electricity, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

  50. Muzenda F, Masocha M, Misi SN (2019) Groundwater quality assessment using a water quality index and GIS: a case of Ushewokunze Settlement, Harare, Zimbabwe. Phys Chem Earth 112:134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2019.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar

  51. Nagarajan R, Rajmohan N, Mahendran U, Senthamilkumar S (2010) Evaluation of groundwater quality and its suitability for drinking and agricultural use in Thanjavur city, Tamil Nadu, India. Environ Monit Assess 171:289–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1279-9

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  52. Narsimha A, Rajitha S (2018) Spatial distribution and seasonal variation in fluoride enrichment in groundwater and its associated human health risk assessment in Telangana State, South India. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 24:2119–2132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1438176

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  53. National Academy of Sciences (1972) Water quality criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC. Report No. EPA-R373-033, 592 p

  54. Peckham S, Lowery D, Spencer S (2015) Are fluoride levels in drinking water associated with hypothyroidism prevalence in England? A large observational study of GP practice data and fluoride levels in drinking water. J Epidemiol Community Health 69:619–624. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2014-204971

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  55. Piper AM (1944) A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water-analyses. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 25:914–928. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR025i006p00914

    Article  Google Scholar

  56. Rahman MS, Saha N, Islam ARMT, Shen S, Bodrud-Doza M (2017) Evaluation of water quality for sustainable agriculture in Bangladesh. Water Air Soil Pollut 228:385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-017-3543-x

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  57. Rajmohan N (2020) Groundwater contamination issues in the shallow aquifer, Ramganga Sub-basin, India. In: Kumar MSD, Honda R (eds) Emerging issues in the water environment during Anthropocene: a South East Asian Perspective. Springer Nature, pp 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9771-5_18

  58. Rajmohan N, Amarasinghe UA (2016) Groundwater quality issues and management in Ramganga Sub-Basin. Environ Earth Sci 75:1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5833-9

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  59. Rajmohan N, Patel N, Singh G, Amarasinghe UA (2017) Hydrochemical evaluation and identification of geochemical processes in the shallow and deep wells in the Ramganga Sub-Basin, India. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:21459–21475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9704-z

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  60. Rajmohan N, Niazi BAM, Masoud MHZ (2019) Evaluation of a brackish groundwater resource in the Wadi Al-Lusub basin, Western Saudi Arabia. Environ Earth Sci 78:451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8441-7

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  61. Rajmohan N, Masoud MHZ, Niyazi BAM (2021) Impact of evaporation on groundwater salinity in the arid coastal aquifer, Western Saudi Arabia. CATENA 196:104864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104864

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  62. Ramsey CR (1986) Geological map of the Rabigh Quadrangle, sheet 22D, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

  63. Rehman F, Cheema T (2016) Effects of sewage waste disposal on the groundwater quality and agricultural potential of a floodplain near Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci 9:307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2340-y

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  64. Richards LA (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. US Department of Agriculture, Government Printing Office, Washington

    Google Scholar

  65. Saleh A, Al-Ruwaih F, Shehata M (1999) Hydrogeochemical processes operating within the main aquifers of Kuwait. J Arid Environ 42:195–209. https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.1999.0511

    Article  Google Scholar

  66. Sengupta P (2013) Potential health impacts of hard water. Int J Prev Med 4:866–875

    Google Scholar

  67. Simsek C, Gunduz O (2007) IWQ index: a GIS-integrated technique to assess irrigation water quality. Environ Monit Assess 128:277–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9312-8

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

  68. Subyani AM (2005) Hydrochemical identification and salinity problem of ground-water in Wadi Yalamlam basin, Western Saudi Arabia. J Arid Environ 60:53–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar

  69. UNESCO (2012) World’s groundwater resources are suffering from poor governance. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Natural Sciences Sector News. Paris. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/media-services/single-view/news/worlds_groundwater_resources_are_suffering_from_poor_gove/. Accessed May 2020

  70. USEPA (1989) Risk assessment guidance for superfund, volume 1: human health evaluation manual (part A). United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington

    Google Scholar

  71. USEPA (1993) Reference Dose (RfD): Description and use in health risk assessments. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington. http://www.epa.gov/iris/rfd.htm. Accessed May 2020

  72. USEPA (1999) Health effects from exposure to high levels of sulfate in drinking water workshop. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, , DC (EPA 815-R-99-002) Atlanta, Georgia

  73. USEPA (2011) Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition (Final Report). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-09/052F, 2011

  74. USEPA (2014) Human health evaluation manual, supplemental guidance: update of standard default exposure factors, OSWER Directive 9200.1-120. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington

    Google Scholar

  75. WHO (2004) Sulfate in drinking water. Background document for development of WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality. WHO/SDE/WSH/03.04/114

  76. WHO (2009) Calcium and magnesium in drinking-water: public health significance. Cotruvo, J, Bartram, J, (eds). WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland

  77. WHO (2011) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 4th Edition

  78. Wilcox LV (1955) Classification and use of irrigation waters. U.S Department of Agriculture Circular No. 969, Washington DC

  79. Zaharani KH, Al-Shayaa MS, Baig MB (2011) Water conservation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for better environment: implications for extension and education. Bulg J Agric Sci 17:389–395

    Google Scholar

  80. Zaidi FK, Nazzal Y, Jafri MK, Naeem M, Ahmed I (2015) Reverse ion exchange as a major process controlling the groundwater chemistry in an arid environment: a case study from northwestern Saudi Arabia. Environ Monit Assess 187:607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4828-4

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar

Download references

Funding

This project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under grant no. G: 123-123-1439.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Water Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80200, Jeddah, 21598, Saudi Arabia

    Natarajan Rajmohan, Milad H. Z. Masoud & Burhan A. M. Niyazi

*Original abstract online at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-020-11383-x

Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF