NTP 2020-2021: Most Referenced Documents
For those who follow this issue, the following documents will be referenced frequently.
| NTP statement and reports NASEM (National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine) |
|
| Feb 9, 2021 | NASEM. Second peer-review of the revised Draft NTP Monograph on the Systematic Review of Fluoride Exposure and Neurodevelopmental and Cognitive Health Effects: A Letter Report. http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/2021.nas-review-of-ntp-second-draft.feb-9.pdf |
| Feb 9, 2021 | NTP. Private statement on ending its systematic review on fluoride’s neurotoxicity and converting their four-year effort into a “state of the science” document. The difference: a systematic review comes to a conclusion on whether the substance is a hazard, whereas a “state of the science” report does not. http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/niehs-ntp.statement.feb-9.2021.ocr_.pdf |
| Sept 16, 2020 | NTP: Revised Draft Monograph on the Systematic Review of Fluoride Exposure and Neurodevelopmental and Cognitive Health Effects. http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/ntp.revised-monograph.9-16-2020.pdf |
| March 5, 2020 | NASEM. First peer review of the Draft NTP Monograph on the Systematic Review of Fluoride Exposure and Neurodevelopmental and Cognitive Health Effects. http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/nas-review-of-ntp-review.march-5-2020.pdf |
| Sept 6, 2019 | NTP. First Draft NTP Monograph on the Systematic Review of Fluoride Exposure and Neurodevelopmental and Cognitive Health Effects. http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/2019.ntp_.draft-fluoride-systematic-review.online-Oct-22.pdf |
Note: If you find any items that are missing, please email them to us. Many thanks.
Print 
PDF