In a critique of our study1 on the IQ of 9–12-year-old children in high- and low drinking water fluoride (F) areas in West Azerbaijan province, Iran, Dr Ken Perrott questioned whether possible confounding factors in the two villages, such as the rural status and parental educational levels, were adequately considered.2
Perrott’s comments on the rural status and the parental educational levels of the villages: Perrott noted that the only data presented were for F concentration and IQ and that no data were given to support two reassuring statements given by the authors: “The two rural areas studied had very similar populations, educational, economic, social, cultural, and general demographic characteristics but differed in the concentration of F in drinking water. Questionnaires were completed by the parents to measure potential confounding factors involving educational, economic, social cultural, and general demographic characteristics.” Perrott considered, despite these statements, that there was “absolutely no consideration of any other factors known to influence IQ” such as population size and parental educational levels.
Perrott stated that in the low-F area of Piranshahr (county), according to Wikipedia, Piranshahr city, Iran, “is one of the fastest-growing cities in Iran. The government’s mid-year estimate for 2013 puts Piranshahr’s population at 270,138 compared with the 2012 figure of 220,000. The city is forecast to have a population of approximately 320,000 by 2014 and 350,000 by 2015. Piranshahr has an educated population and its literacy rate is very high: of Piranshahr’s population over 28.60% (vs. a national average of 24%) hold a bachelor’s degree or higher; 945 (vs. 82% nationally) have a high school diploma or equivalent. In fact, Piranshahr has the highest percentage of college graduates of any city in the entire country.”
For the high-F region of Poldasht, Perrott observed that Poldasht city, Iran, was the capital of Poldasht county, West Azerbaijan province, Iran, and that at the 2006 census its population was 8,584, in 2,205 families. He commented that the city was smaller than Piranshahr and was situated “pretty much in the middle of nowhere” on the Iran/Armenian border. He recorded that he could not find any information on educational levels in Poldasht, pointed out that it was a small remote place, and thought that it was safe to infer that it was culturally and educationally less developed than Piranshahr.
Perrott quoted Dr Jonathan Broadbent as commenting that these towns (Piranshahr city and Poldasht city) were not comparable. Perrott stated that consequently neither would the satellite villages be comparable and that it
appeared that the authors may have indulged in a bit of confirmation bias through sample selection.
Our response to Dr Perrott’s critique: We note that despite the guidelines for authors for Fluoride stating that manuscripts need to be written as concisely as possible, it would have been helpful if we had provided more data in our initial paper and we apologize for this omission. However we do not accept Dr Perrott’s assessment that there was “absolutely no consideration of any other factors known to influence IQ” such as population size and parental educational levels. We now provide further information on the assessment of possible confounding factors in the two villages.
Related Studies :
Using the Raven’s standard progressive matrices to determine the effects of the level of fluoride in drinking water on the intellectual ability of school-age children
Children, aged 9–10½, from 22 villages in Jing County, Hubei Province, China, with different levels of fluoride in the drinking water were tested for their IQs according to the revised version of Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices. Among 141 children in villages with 2.1–4.0 ppm F in the drinking water, 34
A comparative study of the IQ of children age 7-9 in a high and a low fluoride water city in Iran.
Note from Fluoride Action Network:
This is the same study that was published by the journal Journal of Dentistry and Oral Hygiene in 2011.
A study was conducted to evaluate the effect of high and low fluoride (F) in
the drinking water on the Intelligence Quotient (IQ) of young schoolchildren in two
Effect of fluoridated water on intelligence in 10-12-year-old school children.
Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship of drinking water fluoride levels with children's intelligence quotient (IQ).
Materials and methods: Water was collected from initially identified endemic fluoride regions according to the geological research of Government of India. Fluoride concentration of the
A correlation between serum vitamin, acetylcholinesterase activity and IQ in children with excessive endemic fluoride exposure in Rajasthan, India
Fluoride is widely distributed in nature and a direct source of adverse health effects in human populations. Fluoride poisoning attributed by long-term exposure to high levels of fluoride [is] called fluorosis. The present study was carried out among 9-14 years old school children of Dausa district, Rajasthan India. The subjects
Effect of fluoride in drinking water on children’s intelligence.
The Intelligence Quotient (IQ) was measured in 512 children, aged 8–13 years, living in two villages in Sihong County, Jiangsu Province, China, differing in the level of fluoride in their drinking water. In the high-fluoride village of Wamiao (water fluoride: 2.47±0.79 mg/L; range: 0.57–4.50 mg/L), the mean IQ of 222
Related FAN Content :
Fluoride & IQ: The 64 Studies
As of December 2019, a total of 72 studies have investigated the relationship between fluoride and human intelligence. Of these investigations, 64 studies have found that elevated fluoride exposure is associated with reduced IQ in humans, while over 60 animal studies have found that fluoride exposure impairs the learning and/or
Fluoride Affects Learning & Memory in Animals
An association between elevated fluoride exposure and reduced intelligence has now been observed in 64 IQ studies. Although a link between fluoride and intelligence might initially seem surprising or random, it is actually consistent with a large body of animal research. This animal research includes the following 45 studies (out
Fluoride's Direct Effects on Brain: Animal Studies
The possibility that fluoride ingestion may impair intelligence and other indices of neurological function is supported by a vast body of animal research, including over 40 studies that have investigated fluoride's effects on brain quality in animals. As discussed by the National Research Council, the studies have consistently demonstrated that fluoride, at widely varying concentrations, is toxic to the brain.
Fluoride: Developmental Neurotoxicity.
There has been a tremendous amount of research done on the association of exposure to fluoride with developmental neurotoxicity. There are over 60 studies reporting reduced IQ in children and several on the impaired learning/memory in animals. And there are studies which link fluoride to Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
Fluoride's Effect on Fetal Brain
The human placenta does not prevent the passage of fluoride from a pregnant mother's bloodstream to the fetus. As a result, a fetus can be harmed by fluoride ingested pregnancy. Based on research from China, the fetal brain is one of the organs susceptible to fluoride poisoning.
As highlighted by the excerpts