The following is from Chapter 7 on fluoride’s neurotoxicity in the 2006 National Research Council’s (NRC) report on fluoride’s toxicology. This surprisingly thorough report presents the understanding of fluoride’s neurotoxicity at the time. The report identified 4 fluoride IQ studies. Of interest is that all 4 studies were published in the journal Fluoride and that […]
Showing results for: 2006 NRC
NRC (2006): Fluoride’s Effect on Glucose Metabolism
This section on Diabetes includes: • Fluoride & Impaired Glucose Tolerance • Fluoride & Insulin • Fluoride Sensitivity Among Diabetics • Fluoridated Water Causes Severe Dental Fluorosis in Children with Diabetes Insipidus • NRC (2006): Fluoride’s Effect on Glucose Metabolism The following discussion is from pages 258-260 of the NRC’s report’s “Fluoride in Drinking Water: A […]
NRC (2006): Fluoride’s Neurotoxicity and Neurobehavioral Effects
The NRC’s analysis on fluoride and the brain.
NRC (2006): Fluoride’s Impact on the Thyroid Gland
Several lines of information indicate an effect of fluoride exposure on thyroid function. It is difficult to predict exactly what effects on thyroid function are likely at what concentration of fluoride exposure and under what circumstances.
Southampton: Response to Bazian critique of NRC 2006 Fluoride Toxicology Review
February 26, 2009. Letter to: South Central Strategic Health Authority (SHA) Rivergate House, Newbury Business Park London Road Newbury, Berkshire RG14 2PZ UK Via email To: Dr Geoffrey Harris, Chairman, and Board Members, Response to Bazian critique of NRC 2006 Fluoride Toxicology Review Bazian Ltd. was contracted by SHA to critique the US National Research […]
Provided Extensive Information on Fluoride Toxicity to National Research Council (NRC)
Between 2003 and 2005, FAN submitted extensive analysis and documentation to a panel of the National Research Council (NRC) that was charged with reviewing the adequacy of the EPA’s safe drinking water standard for fluoride. The panel invited FAN’s Executive Director, Dr. Paul Connett, to give a presentation alongside a dentist, Dr. William Maas, from the CDC. Maas argued that EPA’s standard was safe and appropriate, while FAN’s Director argued it was dangerously outdated. The CDC has far more resources than FAN, but FAN won the argument. In 2006, the NRC issued a groundbreaking report concluding that EPA’s drinking water standard for fluoride is unsafe and should be lowered.
Thiessen: 2006 Submission to EPA on Sulfuryl Fluoride
General Comment: Re: Dockets EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0174 and EPA-HQ-OPP-2003-0373 Dear Sirs: Regarding the requested stay of tolerances for sulfuryl fluoride, I would like to make a few brief comments. I regret that I have not had the time to give you a more complete review of the proposed tolerances. First, it was inappropriate to base the tolerances […]
FAN in the News: 2001 – 2006
FAN in the News: 2007-2010 2011-2012 2006: Health dept. issues fluoridation warning – Bratteboro Reformer (Vermont, USA), December 19, 2006 “But Michael Connett, an anti-fluoride activist who works for the Fluoride Action Network, said the health department warning is an important wake-up call and should not be taken lightly. For years, Connett said, both the […]
FAN’s Submissions to NRC
The Fluoride Action Network provided the NRC panel extensive information throughout the course of the panel’s three-year review. FAN’s Executive Director, Dr. Paul Connett, was invited to give a presentation at the NRC’s first public hearing in August 2003 and FAN submitted numerous materials to the committee. It was FAN, for example, that provided the […]
Statements from NRC Panelists
The following are quotes from 4 of the 12 scientists who wrote the NRC report, including the Panel Chair, Dr. John Doull: “What the committee found is that we’ve gone with the status quo regarding fluoride for many years—for too long, really—and now we need to take a fresh look. In the scientific community, people […]