On November 6, FAN submitted comments to the Department of Justice’s Environmental and Natural Resources Division and the Environmental Protection Agency on the recent proposed “settlement” over Mosaic Fertilizer LLC’s reckless contamination of the environment at its fertilizer production facilities in Florida and Louisiana. The proposed settlement comes under the federal Resources Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). This Act gives EPA the authority to control hazardous waste from the “cradle-to-grave” and includes the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste.
According to the proposed Consent Decrees:
Mosaic, a giant part of the phosphate fertilizer industry, produces fluorosilicic acid, a hazardous waste that is transformed into a product when it is sold. It is this transformation that allows it to be dumped as a fluoridation chemical in public drinking water across the U.S.
According to the proposed Consent Decrees, Mosaic will not sustain any criminal liabilities for its gross violations of RCRA:
This settlement may appear large (EPA reports state “close to $2 billion”) but there are a lot of smoke and mirrors here. Most of the money is allocated to Mosaic’s remediation of the hazardous waste at its many sites and investments in cleaner production. More importantly, the proposed Consent Decrees circumvents due process because The Ecology Party of Florida and FAN members submitted formal complaints to the US Army Corps of Engineers and EPA describing the myriad deficiencies of the Areawide Environmental Impact Statement (AEIS) prepared under those agencies for the proposed expansion of phosphate mining (primarily by Mosaic) in southern Florida. One of the most glaring omissions in that AEIS was the failure of those federal agencies to consider all of the adverse impacts throughout the U.S. related to production and use of all aspects of fertilizers made from mining phosphate. Instead of initiated a Supplemental AEIS to correct those deficiencies, as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), with public hearings and published drafts of the Supplemental AEIS correcting those deficiencies to determine if the expansion of phosphate mining and all of its cumulative adverse impacts violated federal laws, the proposed Consent Decrees were negotiated behind closed doors, without meeting the NEPA requirements of the AEIS. The Ecology Party of Florida also submitted comments advising the US Department of Justice that the proposed Consent Decrees are unlawful because those decrees circumvent the AEIS process.
From FAN’s point of view the proposed Consent Decrees also represent a double standard. As we say in our submission:
In addition to several measures designed to give greater protection to workers in this industry, FAN is asking that:
Here is a link to our full submission
Please support FAN by sending an email this week to express your support for FAN’s submission to the Department of Justice at pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov – you might want to add that you don’t want to drink Mosaic’s hazardous waste in every glass of water, coffee, tea, and soda that you drink.
Sincerely,
The Team at Fluoride Action Network
Relevant Documents:
Sept 30. United States of America and Florida Department of Environmental Protection (Plaintiffs) v. Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Defendant). Consent Decree. Filed September 30, 2015. 82 pages.
Sept 30. United States of America and Florida Department of Environmental Protection (Plaintiffs) v. Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Defendant). Civil Complaint. Filed September 30, 2015. 99 pages.
Oct 1. United States of America and Florida Department of Environmental Protection (Plaintiffs) v. Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Defendant). Appendices. Filed October 1, 2015. 574 pages.
Sept 30. United States of America and Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (Plaintiffs) v. Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Defendant). Consent Decree. Filed September 30, 2015. 85 pages.
Sept 30. United States of America and Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (Plaintiffs) v. Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Defendant). Civil Complaint. Filed September 30, 2015. 53 pages.
Oct 1. United States of America and Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (Plaintiffs) v. Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Defendant). Attachments. Filed October 1, 2015. 416 pages.
Oct 7. Notice of Lodging of Two Proposed Consent Decrees Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Federal Register.
Oct 1. Press release on the Consent Decrees against Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC, operations in Florida and Louisiana.