Excerpt:

“Municipal tap water and commercially bottled water (except carbonated or mineral waters) are suitable for preparing powdered or concentrated infant formulas. There is no indication for the use of distilled water.

“Concentrated liquid or powdered infant formula can be reconstituted with fluoridated tap water. However, if the families are located in an area with naturally occurring high levels of fluoride (higher than the guideline of 1.5 mg/L), recommend they use a different source of drinking water with a lower fluoride concentration.”


Online as of September 2, 2021 at https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/canada-food-guide/resources/infant-feeding/nutrition-healthy-term-infants-recommendations-birth-six-months.html


Nutrition for healthy term infants: Recommendations from birth to six months


A joint statement of Health Canada, Canadian Paediatric Society, Dietitians of Canada, and Breastfeeding Committee for Canada

This statement by the Infant Feeding Joint Working Group provides health professionals with evidence-informed principles and recommendations. Provinces, territories, and health organizations can use it as a basis for developing practical feeding guidelines for parents and caregivers in Canada.

This statement promotes the communication of accurate and consistent messages on infant nutrition in the first six months. Guidance on nutrition from six months to two years of age will be covered in a separate statement, available in 2013/14.

For information and ideas about how to answer the questions of parents and caregivers, see:

Principles and recommendations for infant nutrition from birth to six months

Breastfeeding – exclusively for the first six months, and sustained for up to two years or longer with appropriate complementary feeding – is important for the nutrition, immunologic protection, growth, and development of infants and toddlers

  • Recommend exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months.
  • Implement the policies and practices of the Baby-Friendly Initiative (BFI) for hospitals and community health services.
  • Recommend a daily vitamin D supplement of 10 µg (400 IU) for breastfed infants.
  • Recommend meat, meat alternatives, and iron-fortified cereal as an infant’s first complementary foods.
  • Use the World Health Organization (WHO) Growth Charts for Canada for optimal monitoring of infant growth.
  • Explain that feeding changes do little to manage infantile colic.
  • Educate about the wide variation in normal bowel function, noting that true constipation is rare.
  • Reassure that reflux or ‘regurgitation’ is common and rarely needs treatment.
  • Manage mild to moderate dehydration from acute gastroenteritis with continued breastfeeding and oral rehydration therapy.
  • Recommend an acceptable alternative to breastfeeding for mothers who are HIV-infected.
  • Advise that most medications are compatible with breastfeeding. Take a case-by-case approach when a mother is using medications or drugs.

Some infants may not be exclusively breastfed for personal, medical, or social reasons. Their families need support to optimize the infant’s nutritional well-being. The International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes (WHO, 1981) advises health professionals to inform parents about the importance of breastfeeding, the personal, social, and economic costs of formula feeding, and the difficulty of reversing the decision not to breastfeed. Individually counsel those families who have made a fully informed choice not to breastfeed on the use of breastmilk substitutes.

Acknowledgements

The Infant Feeding Joint Working Group was a collaboration between Health Canada and national organizations. Members of the working group came from the following organizations:

  • Canadian Paediatric Society’s Nutrition and Gastroenterology Committee (CPS)
  • Dietitians of Canada (DC)
  • Breastfeeding Committee for Canada (BCC)
  • Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)
  • Health Canada (HC)

The working group received guidance from the Infant Feeding Expert Advisory Group as well as broad stakeholder consultation.

Members of the Infant Feeding Expert Advisory Group: Alison Barrett, Gisèle Conway, Laura Haiek, Sheila Innis, Gerry Kasten, Jack Newman, Daniel Roth, Nancy Watters

Participants on the Infant Feeding Joint Working Group: Becky Blair (DC), Julie Castleman (PHAC),  Genevieve Courant (BCC), Jeff Critch (CPS), Patricia D’Onghia (HC), Jessica DiGiovanni (PHAC), Erin Enros (HC), Tanis Fenton (DC), Deborah Hayward (HC), Hélène Lowell (HC), Jennifer McCrea (HC), Brenda McIntyre (HC), Kevin Wood (HC), Christina Zehaluk (HC).

Breastfeeding is the normal and unequalled method of feeding infants.

  • Recommend exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months.

 

Rationale

Exclusive breastfeeding during the first six months is accepted as the nutrition standard for infants according to the Dietary Reference Intakes, and is promoted by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a global public health recommendation (IOM, 2006; WHO, 2003). Exclusive breastfeeding from birth is recommended except in very few medical situations, and is important for the healthy growth and development of infants and toddlers (WHO, 2003).

Exclusive breastfeeding for six months continues to be the target for the implementation of the WHO/UNICEF Baby-Friendly Initiative (BFI) and Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding (WHO, 2003). However, in individual practice, guidance on the appropriate time to introduce complementary foods should also be led by the infant’s signs of readiness and may be a few weeks before or just after the sixth month. Beyond six months, further delay increases risk of iron deficiency. Introducing solid foods too early decreases the duration of exclusive breastfeeding

With exclusive breastfeeding, an infant is fed only breastmilk. The infant is given no other food or liquid, not even water (WHO, 2008). Infants who are exclusively breastfed may still receive vitamin and mineral supplements or medicines, in the form of drops or syrups. They may be given oral rehydration solution, if needed (WHO 2008).

Breastmilk supplies the correct quantity, quality, and absorption of nutrients (Butte, Lopez-Alarcon, & Garza, 2002). Infants digest it easily and efficiently (WHO, 2009). To support optimal growth, the balance of nutrients in breastmilk changes during feedings and over time as the infant matures (Kent et al., 2006; Riordan & Wambach, 2010). Beyond nutrients, breastmilk’s unique and complex composition includes bioactive factors, such as anti-infective immunoglobulins and white blood cells (Riordan & Wambach, 2010). It also contains factors that stimulate the maturation of the small intestine and aid with the digestion and the absorption of nutrients (Hamosh, 1996; Sheard, 1988).

The importance of breastfeeding is well recognized for infants’ short and long-term health (Horta, Bahl, Martines, & Victoria, 2007; Ip et al., 2007; León-Cava, Lutter, Ross, & Martin, 2002). For example, breastfeeding is associated with enhanced cognitive development, and appears to protect against gastrointestinal infections, acute otitis media, respiratory tract infection, and sudden infant death syndrome (Kramer et al., 2008; Quigley et al., 2011; Ip et al., 2007; Hauck, Thompson, Tanabe, Moon, & Vennemann, 2011). Observational research also suggests a protective effect of breastfeeding against obesity later in life (Arenz, Rückerl, Koletzko & von Kries, 2004, Ip et al., 2007).

Exclusive breastfeeding to six months of age is associated with continued protection for the infant against gastrointestinal infections and illness (Kramer et al., 2003; Kramer & Kakuma, 2002) as well as respiratory tract infections (Chantry, Howard, & Auinger, 2006). The breastfeeding mother also benefits from exclusively breastfeeding her infant to six months. Her weight loss is more rapid after birth and there may be a delayed return of menses (Kramer & Kakuma, 2002).

By about six months of age, infants are developmentally ready for other foods (Naylor & Morrow, 2001). The signs of physiological and developmental readiness include (Grenier & Leduc, 2008):

  • Better head control
  • Ability to sit up and lean forward
  • Ability to let the caregiver know when they are full (e.g., turns head away)
  • Ability to pick up food and try to put it in their mouth

At this stage, infants should be offered nutrient dense and safe complementary foods, along with continued breastfeeding (PAHO, 2003). The first foods introduced should be iron-rich.

References

Arenz, S., Rückerl, R., Koletzko, B. von Kries, R. (2004). Breast-feeding and childhood obesity – a systematic review. International Journal of Obesity, 28:1247-1256.

Butte, N., Lopez-Alarcon, M., & Garza, C. (2002). Nutrient adequacy of exclusive breastfeeding for the term infant during the first six months of life. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Chantry, C., Howard, C., Auinger, P. (2006). Full breastfeeding duration and associated decrease in respiratory tract infection in US children. Pediatrics, 117: 425-432.

Grenier, D., Leduc, D. (2008). Well beings: A guide to health in child care (third edition). Ottawa: Canadian Paediatric Society, p. 33.

Hamosh, M. (1996). Digestion in the newborn. Clinics in Perinatology: Neonatal Gastroenterology, 23(2): 191-208

Hauck, F.R., Thompson, J., Tanabe, K.O., Moon, R.Y., Vennemann, M.M. (2011). Breastfeeding and reduced risk of sudden infant death syndrome: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 128(1), 103-110.

Horta, B., Bahl, R., Martines, J., & Victoria, C. (2007). Evidence on the long-term effects of breastfeeding: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Institute of Medicine (2006). Dietary reference intakes – The essential guide to nutrient requirements. Washington DC: National Academies Press.

Ip, S., Chung, M., Raman, G.,  Chew, P.,  Magula, N.,  DeVine, D.,  Trikalinos, T., &  Lau, J. (2007). Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries. AHRQ publication No. 07-E007. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Kent, J.C., Mitoulas, L.R., Cregan, M.D., Ramsay, D.T., Doherty, D.A., & Hartmann, P.E. (2006). Volume and frequency of breastfeedings and fat content of breast milk throughout the day. Pediatrics, 117. e387-e395.

Kramer, M.S.,  Guo, T,  Platt, R.W.,  Sevkovskaya, Z.,  Dzikovich, I.,  Collet, J.P.,  Shapiro, S.,  Chalmers, B.,  Hodnett, E.,  Vanilovich, I.,  Mezen, I.,  Ducruet, T.,  Shishko, G., &  Bogdanovich, N. (2003). Infant growth and health outcomes associated with 3 compared with 6 months exclusive breastfeeding. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 78: 291-295.

Kramer, M.S. & Kakuma, R. (2002). Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Issue 1, Article No. CD003517. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003517.

Kramer, M.S.,  Aboud, F.,  Mironova, E.,  Vanilovich, I.,  Platt, R.W.,  Matush, L.,  Igumnov, S.,  Fombonne, E.,  Bogdanovich, N.,  Ducruet, T.,  Collet, J.P.,  Chalmers, B.,  Hodnett, E.,  Davidovsky, S.,  Skugarevsky, O.,  Trofimovich, O.,  Kozlova, L.,  Shapiro, S. (2008). Breastfeeding and child cognitive development: New evidence from a large randomized trial. Archives of General Psychiatry, 65(5): 578-584.

León-Cava, N., Lutter, C., Ross, J. & Martin, L. (2002). Quantifying the benefits of breastfeeding: A summary of the evidence. Washington: Pan American Health Organization.

Naylor, A.J., Morrow, A.L. (2001). Developmental readiness of normal full term infants to progress from exclusive breastfeeding to the introduction of complementary foods. Washington DC: LINKAGES/Wellstart International.

Pan American Health Organization (2003). Guiding principles for complementary feeding of the breastfed child. Washington DC: Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization.

Quigley, M.A., Hockley, C., Carson, C., Kelly, Y., Renfrew, M.J., & Sacker, A. (2011). Breastfeeding is associated with improved child cognitive development: A population-based cohort study. The Journal of Pediatrics, 160:25-32.

Riordan, J. & Wambach, K. (2010). Breastfeeding and Human Lactation. Sudbury MA.: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Inc. pp. 497-518.

Sheard, N. (1988). The role of breastmilk in the development of the gastrointestinal tract. Nutrition Reviews, 48(1):1-8.

World Health Organization and UNICEF. (2003).  Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding. Geneva: World Health Organization.

World Health Organization. (2009). Infant and young child feeding (model chapter for textbooks for medical students and allied health professionals), pp 9-17. Geneva: World Health Organization.

World Health Organization. (2008). Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Breastfeeding initiation and duration rates increase with active protection, support, and promotion.

  • Implement the policies and practices of the Baby-Friendly Initiative (BFI) for hospitals and community health services.

 

Rationale

Breastfeeding initiation rates in Canada have increased considerably in recent decades, from less than 25% in 1965 (Millar & Maclean, 2005) to 88.4% in 2011 (Statistics Canada, 2012). Yet, of the mothers who initiate breastfeeding, some stop after less than one week and close to 25% stop before their infant is one month old (Health Canada, 2012). The percentage of Canadian mothers exclusively breastfeeding their infants to six months remains low, at 27.8% (Statistics Canada, 2012).

Mothers most at risk of not meeting recommendations for breastfeeding and thereby needing further support are typically not married, less educated and of lower socio-economic status (Health Canada 2012).

The WHO/UNICEF Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) was created to improve breastfeeding outcomes for infants and their mothers (WHO/UNICEF, 2009). The BFHI evidence-informed practices have been shown to increase the duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding (Kramer et al., 2001; Merten, Dratva, & Ackermann-Liebrich, 2005; DiGirolamo, Grummer-Strawn, & Fein, 2008; Chung et al., 2008; Declercq, Labbok, Sakala, & O’Hara, 2009; Moore, Anderson, & Berman, 2009; Cattaneo & Buzzetti, 2001). For example, early supplementation for non-medical reasons, which continues to be a prevalent practice, is addressed by BFHI because it is associated with decreased duration of exclusive breastfeeding (Toronto Public Health, 2010).

The BFHI is based on the policies and practices described in Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding, the Global Strategy for infant and Young Child Feeding (WHO/UNICEF, 2003), the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes, and subsequent World Health Assembly resolutions on nutrition for infants and young children.

In Canada, the Baby-Friendly Initiative (BFI) has been adapted from the BFHI to reflect the continuum of care between hospital and community services. It is described in the Integrated 10 Steps for Hospitals and Community Health Services. The ‘Baby-Friendly’ designation is given to a maternity hospital or a community health facility that puts the Ten Steps into practice and adheres to the Code. Implementation of the BFI is led by provincial and territorial governments in collaboration with the Breastfeeding Committee for Canada.

WHO/UNICEF’s Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding (global criteria)

(Reproduced from WHO/UNICEF, 2009)

Step 1
Have a written policy on breastfeeding that is routinely communicated to all health care staff.

Step 2
Train all health care staff in the skills necessary to implement the policy.

Step 3
Inform all pregnant women about the benefits and management of breastfeeding.

Step 4
Help mothers initiate breastfeeding within a half-hour of birth.
This Step is now interpreted as:
Place babies in skin-to-skin contact with their mothers immediately following birth for at least an hour. Encourage mothers to recognize when their babies are ready to breastfeed and offer help if needed.

Step 5
Show mothers how to breastfeed and how to maintain lactation, even if they should be separated from their infants.

Step 6
Give newborn infants no food or drink other than breastmilk, unless medically indicated.

Step 7
Practice rooming-in — allow mothers and infants to remain together — 24 hours a day.

Step 8
Encourage breastfeeding on demand.

Step 9
Give no artificial teats or pacifiers (also called dummies or soothers) to breastfeeding infants.

Step 10
Foster the establishment of breastfeeding support groups and refer mothers to them on discharge from the hospital or clinic.

Breastfeeding Committee for Canada Baby-Friendly Initiative Integrated 10 Steps for Hospitals and Community Health Services (the Interpretation for Canadian Practice)

(Modified from Breastfeeding Committee for Canada, 2011a)

Step 1
Have a written breastfeeding policy that is routinely communicated to all health care providers and volunteers.

Step 2
Ensure all health care providers have the knowledge and skills necessary to implement the breastfeeding policy.

Step 3
Inform pregnant women and their families about the importance and process of breastfeeding.

Step 4
Place babies in uninterrupted skin-to-skin contact with their mothers immediately following birth for at least an hour or until completion of the first feeding or as long as the mother wishes: encourage mothers to recognize when their babies are ready to feed, offering help as needed.

Step 5
Assist mothers to breastfeed and maintain lactation should they face challenges including separation from their infants.

Step 6
Support mothers to exclusively breastfeed for the first six months, unless supplements are medically indicated.

Step 7
Facilitate 24 hour rooming-in for all mother-infant dyads: mothers and infants remain together.

Step 8
Encourage baby-led or cue-based breastfeeding. Encourage sustained breastfeeding beyond six months with appropriate introduction of complementary foods.

Step 9
Support mothers to feed and care for their breastfeeding babies without the use of artificial teats or pacifiers (dummies or soothers).

Step 10
Provide a seamless transition between the services provided by the hospital, community health services, and peer-support programs. Apply principles of primary health care and population health to support the continuum of care and implement strategies that affect the broad determinants that will improve breastfeeding outcomes.

Summary of the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes

This Code seeks to protect and promote breastfeeding by ensuring the ethical marketing of breastmilk substitutes by industry.

  • No advertising of these products (i.e., formula, bottles, nipples, pacifiers) to the public.
  • No free samples of these products to mothers.
  • No promotion of artificial feeding products in health care facilities, including the distribution of free or low-cost supplies.
  • No company representatives to advise mothers.
  • No gifts or personal samples to health workers.
  • No words or pictures idealizing artificial feeding, including pictures of infants on the labels of products.
  • Information to health workers should be scientific and factual.
  • All information on artificial infant feeding, including the labels, should explain the benefits of breastfeeding, and the cost and hazards associated with artificial feeding.
  • Unsuitable products, such as sweetened condensed milk, should not be promoted for babies.
  • All products would be of a high quality and take account of the climatic and storage conditions of the country where they are used.

Source: Breastfeeding Committee for Canada (2011b)

References

Breastfeeding Committee for Canada. (2011a). Breastfeeding Committee for Canada Baby-Friendly Initiative  Integrated 10 Steps & WHO Code Practice Outcome Indicators for Hospitals and Community Health Services: Summary (the Interpretation for Canadian Practice).

Breastfeeding Committee for Canada. (2011b). BFI Integrated 10 Steps Practice Outcome Indicators for Hospitals and Community Health Services, Appendix 11.2:  Summary of the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes and Relevant Resolutions of the World Health Assembly.

Cattaneo, A., & Buzzetti, R. (2001). Effect on rates of breast feeding of training for the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative. BMJ, 323:1358-62.

Chung, M., Ip, S., Yu, W., Raman, G., Trikalinos, T., DeVine, D., & Lau, J. (2008). Interventions in primary care to promote breastfeeding: A systematic review. AHRQ publication No. 08-05125-EF-1. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Declercq, E., Labbok, M.H., Sakala, C., & O’Hara, M. (2009). Hospital practices and women’s likelihood of fulfilling their intention to exclusively breastfeed. American Journal of Public Health, 99:929-35.

DiGirolamo, A.M., Grummer-Strawn, L.M., & Fein, S.B. (2008). Effect of maternity-care practices on breastfeeding. Pediatrics, 122:S43-S49.

Kramer, M.S., Chalmers, B., Hodnett, E.D.,  Sevkovskaya, Z.,  Dzikovich, I.,  Shapiro, S.,  Collet, J.P.,  Vanilovich, I.,  Mezen, I.,  Ducruet, T.,  Shishko, G.,  Zubovich, V.,  Mknuik, D.,  Gluchanina, E.,  Dombrovskiy, V.,  Ustinovitch, A.,  Kot, T.,  Bogdanovich, N.,  Ovchinikova, L.,  Helsing, E. (2001). Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT): A randomized trial in the Republic of Belarus. JAMA, 285(4):413-420.

Merten, S., Dratva, J., & Ackermann-Liebrich, U. (2005). Do baby-friendly hospitals influence breastfeeding duration on a national level? Pediatrics, 116:e702-e708.

Millar, W.J., Maclean, H. (2005). Breastfeeding practices. Health Reports, 16(2):23-31.

Moore, E.R., Anderson, G.C., & Berman, N. (2009). Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007. Issue 3, Article No.: CD003519.

Statistics Canada. (2012). Health Trends.  Statistics Canada Catalogue No. 82-213-XWE. Ottawa. Released June 19, 2012.

Toronto Public Health. (2010). Breastfeeding in Toronto – Promoting Supportive Environments.

World Health Organization and UNICEF. (2003).  Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding. Geneva: World Health Organization.

WHO/UNICEF. (2009).  Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative: Revised, updated and expanded for integrated care. Section 1: Background and implementation.

Supplemental vitamin D is recommended for breastfed infants.

  • Recommend a daily vitamin D supplement of 10 µg (400 IU) for breastfed infants.

 

Rationale

Cases of vitamin D deficiency still occur in Canada among infants who do not receive supplements (Ward, Gaboury, Ladhani, & Zlotkin, 2007). A daily vitamin D supplement of 10µg (400 IU) is recommended for exclusively and partially breastfed infants, from birth to one year of age. Without supplementation, an infant’s vitamin D stores will be depleted (Butte, Lopez-Alarcon, & Garza, 2002). This is particularly true if the mother’s stores are low (Butte, Lopez-Alarcon, & Garza, 2002; Salle, Delvin, Lapillonne, Bishop, & Glorieux, 2000).

Low stores can lead to adverse effects such as vitamin D-deficiency rickets. Rickets is the inadequate mineralization and deformation of the bones. Evidence consistently links low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations to confirmed cases of rickets in infants (Chung et al., 2009; IOM, 2011). Daily vitamin D supplements have been recommended for breastfed infants in Canada since 1967. They have been shown to be an effective preventative measure against rickets (Lerch & Meissner, 2007).

The level of adequate intake for vitamin D for infants is 10 µg (400 IU) per day, based on intakes consistent with desirable serum 25(OH)D concentrations (IOM, 2011). For infants under six months of age, vitamin D intake should not exceed 25 µg (1000 IU) per day. This is the highest average daily intake level likely to pose no risk of adverse health effects (IOM, 2011). There are no known health benefits associated with intakes above 10 µg (400 IU) per day (IOM, 2011).

The evidence available at this time supports the adequacy of the 10 µg (400 IU) daily supplement for infants living in any part of Canada (IOM, 2011). Recommendations for vitamin D intake are set assuming only minimal sun exposure (IOM, 2011). Although, sunlight, which stimulates the formation of vitamin D in the skin, is the primary source of vitamin D for humans, current practice advises that infants under one year avoid direct sunlight due to the risk of skin cancer (Health Canada, 2011).

Canadian data suggests nearly three quarters of breastfed infants receive vitamin D supplements. However, awareness should be increased among the groups least likely to give vitamin D supplements. These include (Health Canada, 2012):

  • single/divorced/separated/widowed mothers
  • black mothers
  • mothers with a lower household income
  • mothers with a lower education level

For information and ideas about how to talk to families about vitamin D supplements, see In practice: Talking to families about infant nutrition.

References

Butte, N., Lopez-Alarcon, M., & Garza, C. (2002). Nutrient adequacy of exclusive breastfeeding for the term infant during the first six months of life. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Chung, M., Balk, E.M., Brendel, M., Ip, S., Lau, J., Lee, J., Lichtenstein, A., Patel, K., Raman, G., Tatsioni, A., Terasawa, T., & Trikalinos, T.A. (2009). Vitamin D and calcium: Systematic review of health outcomes. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 183. AHRQ Publication No. 09-5015, Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Institute of Medicine. (2011). Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.

Lerch, C. & Meissner, T. (2007). Interventions for the prevention of nutritional rickets in term born children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Issue 4, Article No.: CD006164.

Salle, B.L., Delvin, E.E., Lapillonne, A., Bishop, N.J., & Glorieux, F.H. (2000). Perinatal metabolism of vitamin D. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 71: 1317S-24S.

Ward, L.M., Gaboury, I., Ladhani, M., & Zlotkin, S. (2007). Vitamin D-deficiency rickets among children in Canada. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 177 (2):161-6.

First complementary foods should be iron-rich.

  • Recommend meat, meat alternatives, and iron-fortified cereal as an infant’s first complementary foods.

 

Rationale

Maintaining adequate iron is essential to infant growth and cognitive, neurological, motor, and behavioural development. Iron is a critical nutrient in brain development. Deficiencies during infancy and childhood may have serious and irreversible effects (Lozoff & Georgieff, 2006; Beard, 2008).

Most healthy term infants are born with sufficient stores of iron to meet their iron needs until they are about six months old (IOM, 2001; Butte, Lopez-Alarcon, & Garza, 2002; Dewey & Chaparro, 2007). At about six months of age, iron stores are depleted and breastmilk alone can no longer meet all of the infant’s nutrient requirements (Butte et al. 2002; Meinzen-Derr et al., 2006, Dewey & Chapparo, 2007). At this stage, iron-rich foods, such as meat, meat alternatives (e.g., eggs, tofu, and legumes), and iron-fortified infant cereals, are important to help meet the nutrient needs of the rapidly growing infant (ESPGHAN, 2008; Yang et al., 2009; Christofides, Schauer, & Zlotkin, 2005).

While meat and fish are traditional first foods for some Aboriginal groups, the common practice in North America has been to introduce infant cereal, vegetables, and fruit as first complementary foods (Friel, Hanning, Isaak, Prowse, & Miller, 2010; Dee et al., 2008; Statistics Canada, 2004). However, the daily or frequent consumption of heme iron foods (meat, poultry, and fish) can contribute considerably to meeting infant iron requirements (PAHO, 2003; Krebs & Hambidge, 2007). Infants should be offered iron containing foods two or more times each day. They should be served meat,  fish, poultry, or meat alternatives daily. The amount of food offered should be guided by the infant’s hunger and satiety cues (PAHO, 2003). Breastfeeding continues to provide the main source of nutrition as other foods are introduced.

References

Beard, J. (2008). Why iron deficiency is important in infant development. Journal of Nutrition, 138. 2534-2536.

Butte, N., Lopez-Alarcon, M., & Garza, C. (2002). Nutrient adequacy of exclusive breastfeeding for the term infant during the first six months of life. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Christofides, A., Schauer, C., & Zlotkin, S.H. (2005). Iron deficiency and anemia prevalence and associated etiologic risk factors in First Nations and Inuit communities in Northern Ontario and Nunavut. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 96. 304-307.

Dee, D.L.,  Sharma, A.J.,  Cogswell, M.E.,  Grummer-Strawn, L.M.,  Fein, S.B., &  Scanlon, K.S. (2008). Sources of supplemental iron among breastfed infants during the first year of life. Pediatrics, 122. S98-104.

Dewey, K. & Chaparro, C. (2007). Symposium. Nutrition in early life: New horizons in a new century. Session 4: Mineral metabolism and body composition: Iron status of breast-fed infants. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 66. 412-422.

European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Committee on Nutrition (2008). Complementary feeding: A commentary by the ESPGHAN. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 46:99-110.

Friel, J.K., Hanning, R.M., Isaak, C.A., Prowse, D., & Miller, A.C. (2010). Canadian infants’ nutrient intakes from complementary foods during the first year of life. Baylor College of Medicine Pediatrics.

Institute of Medicine. (2001). Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

Krebs, N.F. & Hambidge, K.M. (2007). Complementary feeding: Clinically relevant factors affecting timing and composition. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 85(suppl):639S-645S.

Lozoff, B. & Georgieff, M.K. (2006). Iron deficiency and brain development. Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, 13(3). 158-165.

Meinzen-Derr, M., Guerrero, L., Altaye, M., Ortega-Gallegos, H., Ruiz-Palacios, G., & Morrow, A. (2006). Risk of infant anemia is associated with exclusive breast-feeding and maternal anemia in a Mexican cohort. Journal of Nutrition, 136. 452-458.

Pan American Health Organization. (2003). Guiding principles for complementary feeding of the breastfed child. Washington DC: Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization.

Statistics Canada. (2004). Canadian Community Health Survey 2.2. Detailed food/recipe file.

Yang, Z., Lonnerdal, B., Adu-Afarwuah, S., Brown, K., Chapparro, C., Cohen, R., Domelloff, M., Hernell, O., Lartey, A., & Dewey, K. (2009). Prevalence and predictors of iron deficiency in fully breastfed infants at 6 months of age: Comparison data from 6 studies. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 89. 1433-1440.

Routine growth monitoring is important for assessing infant health and nutrition.

 

Rationale

In infancy, routine growth monitoring helps to identify nutrition or health problems in their early stages, when corrective action is most effective. Serial measurements of weight, length and head circumference should be part of scheduled “well-baby” visits. Measurements should also be performed at “unwell” visits for those who are not brought for the recommended visits (Collaborative Statement, 2010).

The WHO Child Growth Standards are based on the growth of healthy breastfed infants, living in “conditions likely to favour the achievement of their full genetic potential” (WHO, 2006). The Growth Standards provide the normative growth model for how infants and young children grow regardless of their ethnic background and regardless of feeding method (Collaborative Statement, 2010).

The WHO standards have been promoted for use in Canada by the Dietitians of Canada, the Canadian Paediatric Society, the College of Family Physicians of Canada, and Community Health Nurses of Canada (Collaborative Statement, 2010). Growth charts, interpretation guides for health professionals, and parent information are available from  Dietitians of Canada and the  Canadian Paediatric Society.

Assessing infant growth requires several measurements, taken over time. Interpretation of the growth pattern should include clinical, developmental, and behavioural assessments as well as an assessment of feeding. Consider all of the following factors before suggesting a change to diet or invasive investigation:

  • gestational age at birth (use of corrected age)
  • growth trajectory (growth pattern)
  • birth weight
  • any problems with lactation
  • any acute or chronic illness

References

Collaborative Statement – Dietitians of Canada, Canadian Paediatric Society, College of Family Physicians of Canada, & Community Health Nurses of Canada (2010).  Promoting optimal monitoring of child growth in Canada: Using the new WHO growth charts.

World Health Organization (2006). WHO Child Growth Standards — Methods and development: Length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height, and body mass index -for-age. Geneva: WHO.

Feeding changes are unnecessary for most common health conditions in infancy.

  • Explain that feeding changes do little to manage infantile colic.
  • Educate about the wide variation in normal bowel function, noting that true constipation is rare.
  • Reassure that reflux or regurgitation is common and rarely needs treatment.
  • Manage mild to moderate dehydration from acute gastroenteritis with continued breastfeeding and oral rehydration therapy.

 

Rationale

During the first six months, infants may experience symptoms that may lead to unnecessary interventions; this can compromise the nutrition of the exclusively breastfed infant. Unfortunately, many practices still used to manage these symptoms are not evidence-based and may be harmful. It is generally not beneficial to alter feeding practices, interrupt breastfeeding, supplement with formula, or restrict the diet of the breastfeeding mother.

Health professionals should be knowledgeable about the wide variations and the normal variants in infant behaviours, such as crying time and frequency, consistency of bowel movements, and amount of regurgitation.

Infantile colic

Infantile colic typically starts before three to four weeks of age and resolves by four months. Infants with colic have periods of irritability, fussiness, or crying that start and stop without obvious cause and with no evidence of failure to thrive. A commonly used definition of colic is that the episodes last three or more hours per day and occur at least three days per week for at least one week (Hyman, Milla, Benninga, Davidson, Fleisher, & Taminiau, 2006). Depending on the definition, the reported cumulative incidence varies between 5% and 19% (Lucassen et al., 2001).

The etiology of infantile colic is unknown. Current hypotheses suggest that it may have several independent causes. These include (Savino, 2007):

  • immaturity of gut function
  • altered visceral perception
  • (rarely) cow milk allergy

While infantile colic is a self-limiting condition, it is usually very stressful for caregivers. This often results in a variety of behavioural, nutritional, and pharmacological interventions. Unfortunately, few of these interventions have been subjected to appropriately designed trials.

Health professionals should first reassure caregivers that colic usually resolves by itself around four months. They should provide counselling and encouragement and check that caregivers have sufficient supports in place. Cuddling, rocking, stroking, and massaging are common ways to soothe an infant.

Although cow milk allergy appears to be infrequently associated with colic, some studies have demonstrated a reduction in symptoms in a small minority of infants when breastfeeding mothers consumed a hypoallergenic diet (Hill et al., 2005). However, many of these studies were unblinded, with small sample sizes and inadequate outcome measures. For breastfed infants with severe colic, a one- to two-week, cow milk-free maternal diet trial may help. This trial should be done with assistance from a registered dietitian, to ensure that all sources of cow milk protein are eliminated from the mother’s diet and adequately substituted.

Others have proposed that abnormal gut microflora may lead to the development of colic through its effect on intestinal fatty acids (Savino, 2007). While there have been some studies using probiotics as a supplement for breastfed infants, there is currently insufficient evidence to recommend their use for colic (CPS, 2011).

Constipation

Parents frequently express concern over their infants’ bowel habits. The frequency of bowel movements varies widely during infancy. In the first one to two days after birth, newborns pass meconium, which is a dark green, almost black bowel movement. After that, the stools become lighter. Infants fed breastmilk have, on average, 3 yellow, loose, and seedy bowel movements per day (Fontana et al., 1989). Some infants may have stooling with each feeding. After the first four to six weeks, some healthy infants fed breastmilk may have bowel movements as infrequently as once every three to four days or even longer (Baker et al., 2006; Hyman et al., 2006).

While breastfed infants receiving adequate milk may experience infrequent stools, constipation is extremely rare. Normal bowel function occurs even when an infant appears to be in extreme discomfort, showing straining and reddening of the face. Unfortunately, this wide range of ‘normal’ in infant stooling frequency and consistency is often misinterpreted, leading to an erroneous diagnosis of constipation.

Reassure the caregiver that bowel function is within normal variants if the infant is growing normally and there are no signs of obstruction or enterocolitis (Baker et al., 2006). Home remedies such as prune juice, corn syrup or brown sugar water are not recommended for exclusively breastfed infants younger than six months.

Reflux

Gastroesophageal reflux is the passage of gastric contents into the esophagus, with or without regurgitation. This normal physiologic process can occur several times a day in healthy infants. About half of healthy three- to four-month old infants regurgitate at least once daily (Nelson, Chen, Syniar, & Kaufer Christoffel, 1997; Martin et al., 2002; Vandenplas et al., 2009).

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) occurs only when gastric reflux leads to troublesome symptoms or complications (Vandenplas et al., 2009). Most infants who regurgitate have no symptoms or complications and require no treatment, other than educating and reassuring the parents. Most importantly, breastfeeding should not be discontinued due to regurgitation. If there is concern that an infant is suffering from GERD, they should be referred to a physician experienced in its diagnosis and management.

Acute gastroenteritis

Acute gastroenteritis is diarrhea, which is generally defined as a decrease in the consistency of stools (loose or liquid) and/or an increase in the frequency of evacuation, with or without fever or vomiting (Guarino et al.,2008). In Canada, acute gastroenteritis is usually secondary to viral infections, with rotavirus being the most common cause of severe gastroenteritis. Breastfeeding reduces the risk of gastrointestinal infections in infants (Guarino et al., 2008; Ip et al., 2007).

Dehydration is the main clinical concern of acute gastroenteritis. It generally reflects disease severity. For mild to moderate dehydration, rehydration should start as soon as possible using  oral rehydration therapy (CPS, 2006). Breastfeeding should continue during rehydration therapy, as it has been shown to reduce the severity and the duration of diarrhea from rotavirus (Guarino et al., 2008; Khin et al., 1985; Haffejee, 1990).

Infants with severe dehydration must be managed in a hospital setting with intravenous rehydration.

References

Bahl, R., Bhandari, N., Saksena, M., Strand, T., Kumar, G.T., & Bhan, M.K. (2002). Efficacy of zinc-fortified oral rehydration solution in 6- to 35-month old children with acute diarrhea. Journal of Pediatrics, 141:677-682.

Baker, S.S., Liptak, G. S., Colletti, R. B., Croffie, J.M., Di Lorenzo, C., Ector, W., & Nurko, S. (2006). Clinical practice guideline NASPGHAN. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 43:e1-e13.

Canadian Paediatric Society Nutrition and Gastroenterology Committee. (2011). Infantile colic: Is there a role for dietary interventions? (Practice point). Paediatrics & Child Health, 16(1): 47-49.

Canadian Paediatric Society Nutrition Committee. (2006). Oral rehydration therapy and early refeeding in the management of childhood gastroenteritis. Paediatrics & Child Health, 11(8). 527-531.

Fontana, M., Bianchi, C., Cataldo. F., Conti Nibali, S., Cucchiara, S., Gobio Casali, L., Iacono, G., Sanfilippo, M., & Torre, G. (1989). Bowel frequency in healthy children. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica, 78:682Y4.

Guarino, A., Albano, F., Ashkenazi, S., Gendrel, D., Hoekstra, J. H., Shamir, R., & Szajewska, H. (2008). Evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute gastroenteritis in children in Europe. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 46:S81-S122.

Haffejee, I.E. (1990). Cow’s milk-based formula, human milk, and soya feeds in acute infantile diarrhea: a therapeutic trial. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 10:193-8.

Hill, D.J.,  Roy, N.,  Heine, R.G.,  Hosking, C.S.,  Francis, D.E.,  Brown, J.,  Speirs, B.,  Sadowsky, J., &  Carlin, J.B. (2005). Effect of a low-allergen maternal diet on colic among breastfed infants: A randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics, 116. e709-e715.

Hyman, P.E., Milla, P.J., Benninga, M.A., Davidson, G.P., Fleisher, D.F., & Taminiau, J. (2006). Childhood functional gastrointestinal disorders: Neonate/toddler. Gastroenterology, 130(5):1519-26.

Ip, S., Chung, M., Raman, G.,  Chew, P.,  Magula, N.,  DeVine, D.,  Trikalinos, T., &  Lau, J. (2007). Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries. AHRQ publication No. 07-E007. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Khin, M.U., Nyunt Nyunt,W., Myo K. et al. (1985). Effect on clinical outcome of breastfeeding during acute diarrhoea. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition), 290:587-9.

Lucassen, P.L., Assendelft, W.J., van Eijk, J.T., Gubbels, J.W., Douwes, A.C., van Geldrop W.J. (2001). Systematic review of the occurrence of infantile colic in the community. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 84:398-403.

Martin, A.J., Pratt, N., Kennedy, J.D.,  Ryan, P.,  Ruffin, R.E.,  Miles, H., &  Marley, J. (2002). Natural history and familial relationships of infant spilling to 9 years of age. Pediatrics, 109:1061-7.

Nelson, S.P., Chen, E.H., Syniar, G.M., & Kaufer Christoffel, K. (1997). Prevalence of symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux during infancy: A pediatric practice-based survey. Pediatric Practice Research Group. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 151:569-72.

Savino, F. (2007). Focus on infantile colic. Acta Paediatrica. 96(9):1259-64.

Vandenplas, Y., Rudolph, C.D., Di Lorenzo, C., Hassall, E., Liptak, G., Mazur, L., Sondheimer, J., Staiano, A., Thomson, M., Veereman-Wauters, G., & Wenzl, T.G. (2009). Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux clinical practice guidelines: Joint recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN). Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 49(4):498-547.

Breastfeeding is rarely contraindicated.

  • Recommend an acceptable alternative to breastfeeding for mothers who are HIV infected.
  • Advise that most medications are compatible with breastfeeding. Take a case-by-case approach when a mother is using medications or drugs.

 

Rationale

Galactosemia is one of only a few rare instances when an infant cannot tolerate breastmilk (WHO/UNICEF, 2009a).

There are also very few situations when a mother cannot, or should not, breastfeed. These include when the mother:

  • is HIV-infected
  • has herpes lesions on both breasts
  • has untreated, infectious tuberculosis
  • has a severe illness that prevents her from caring for her infant (WHO/UNICEF, 2009a)

A mother’s use of certain drugs or treatments represents a situation when stopping or interrupting breastfeeding may be indicated. Mothers should be supported to maintain lactation during a temporary interruption.

Maternal infections

HIV can be transmitted from an infected mother to her infant during breastfeeding (WHO, 2008). The risk of HIV transmission continues as long as the infant is breastfed (WHO, 2009). Current recommendations are that breastfeeding should be avoided, even if the HIV-positive mother is receiving antiretroviral therapy. This is consistent with the WHO’s recommendation in countries where suitable breastmilk substitutes are available (WHO, 2009). Counselling about the risks of HIV transmission during pregnancy and lactation are an important part of early prenatal care (Lawrence & Lawrence, 2001).

Tuberculosis is rarely transmitted through breastmilk, but can be transmitted by exposure to sputum from an infected mother or other caretaker (Infectious Diseases and Immunization Committee, 2006). Herpes can be transmitted from lesions on the breast where they may come into contact with the infant’s mouth (WHO/UNICEF, 2009). Hepatitis C is not transmitted through breastmilk, but it can be transmitted from cracked and bleeding nipples (CDC, 2009; Infectious Diseases and Immunization Committee, 2006).

With Hepatitis B, although the virus may be found in breastmilk, transmission through breastfeeding has never been reported. Breastfeeding can be safely recommended for these infants (Shi et al., 2011; CDC, 2009; Infectious Diseases and Immunization Committee, 2006).

Medications and illicit drugs

Most common prescriptions are minimally excreted through breastmilk and are compatible with breastfeeding. This includes antibiotics, most medications for diabetes, and over-the-counter drugs such as acetaminophen (Briggs, Freeman, & Yaffe, 2011; Feig, Briggs, & Koren, 2007; Hale, 2010). They are pharmacokinetically benign to the infant (AAP Committee on Drugs, 2001).

When safer alternatives to medications or therapies such as antimetabolites, chemotherapeutic agents, and radioactive isotope therapies cannot be found, a mother may need to at least temporarily avoid breastfeeding (Briggs et al., 2011; AAP Committee on Drugs, 2001; Hale, 2010; Koren & Lishner, 2011).

Natural health products (NHP) and herbal remedies may contain pharmacologically active substances. They should be used with caution by breastfeeding mothers. Refer to Health Canada’s  NHP Monograph for guidance on specific substances.

Women should be cautioned against using illicit drugs, and given support to abstain during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Illicit drugs can have harmful effects on breastfed infants and impair the mother’s ability to care for her infant. If the mother is unable to stop, or chooses not to stop illicit drug use, she should be advised of the importance of breastfeeding and the risks the drug use poses, based on her circumstances.

The  Motherisk website and the French language website for the  centre IMAGe (available in French only) are other useful sources of information on the transfer of drugs and health products to breastmilk and their potential effects on milk supply or on infant health. Refer to Health Canada’s  Drug Product Database for detailed product monographs.

For advice about how to talk to mothers about smoking and alcohol see In practice: Talking to families about infant nutrition.

References

American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs. (2001). The transfer of drugs and other chemicals into human milk. Pediatrics, Vol. 108(3).

Briggs, G.G., Freeman, R.K., & Yaffe, S.J. (2011). Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation (Ninth Edition). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). Breastfeeding: Disease and conditions —  hepatitis B and C infections.

Feig, D.S., Briggs, G.G., & Koren, G. (2007). Oral antidiabetic agents in pregnancy and lactation: A paradigm shift? Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 41(7):1174-1180.

Hale, TW. 2010. Medications and Mothers’ Milk – Fourteenth Edition. Hale Publishing. Amarillo, Texas.

Infectious Diseases and Immunization Committee. Canadian Paediatric Society. (2006). Maternal infectious diseases, antimicrobial therapy or immunizations: Very few contraindications to breastfeeding. Pediatrics and Child Health, 11(8) 489-491.

Koren, G. & Lishner, M. (2011). Cancer in Pregnancy and Lactation: The Motherisk Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lawrence, R.M. & Lawrence R.A. (2001). Given the benefits of breastfeeding, what contraindications exist? Pediatric Clinics of North America, 48(1):235-51.

Shi, Z., Yang, Y., Wang, H., Ma, L., Schreiber, A., Li, X., Sun, W., Zhao, X,, Yang, X., Zhang, L., Lu, W., Teng, J., & An, Y. (2011). Breastfeeding of newborns by mothers carrying hepatitis B virus – A meta-analysis and systematic review. Archives of Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine, 165(9): 837-846.

WHO. (2008). HIV Transmission through breastfeeding – A review of available evidence, 2007 update. France: World Health Organization.

WHO/UNICEF. (2009). Acceptable medical reasons for use of breast-milk substitutes. Geneva: World Health Organization.

WHO. (2009). HIV and infant feeding – Revised principles and recommendations – Rapid Advice. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Recommendations on the use of breastmilk substitutes

If it is not possible for a mother to exclusively breastfeed an infant, the parents or caregivers of the child should be supported to ensure the infant’s nutritional well-being. They should be given appropriate information on breastmilk substitutes.

When feeding at the breast is not possible, the first choice is to feed expressed breastmilk from the infant’s own mother. For situations when the infant is partially breastfed, it is important to support the mother to maintain or improve lactation.

For infants who cannot or should not be fed their mother’s breastmilk, pasteurised human milk from appropriately screened donors and commercial infant formula are suitable alternatives. These options depend on individual circumstances.

Breastmilk from appropriately screened donors must be properly collected, pasteurized, and stored. The only way to ensure this is to obtain the breastmilk from a milk bank that is operated under the Human Milk Bank Association of North America Guidelines. Access to pasteurised human milk from appropriately screened donors is currently limited in Canada. Hospitalised infants who will get the most benefit have highest priority for this milk (CPS, 2010). Despite the limited access to human milk banks, this statement does not endorse the sharing or use of unprocessed and unscreened human milk (Health Canada, 2010a).

Commercial infant formula may be the most feasible alternative if it is not possible for an infant to be exclusively fed their mother’s breastmilk. The commercial infant formula chosen must be appropriate for the infant, and prepared and stored safely to reduce the risk of illness from bacterial growth.

  • Recommend cow milk-based, commercial infant formula for an infant who is not exclusively fed breastmilk. Soy-based infant formula is indicated only for those infants who have galactosemia or who cannot consume dairy-based products for cultural or religious reasons.
  • Recommend infant formulas for special medical purposes only when you detect or suspect that the formula-fed infant has the indicated condition.
  • Discourage the use of home-made, evaporated milk formula. Cow milk, goat milk, soy beverage, rice beverage or any other beverages should not be given to young infants.
  • Advise on proper preparation and storage to reduce the risk of bacteria-related illness.
  • Warn of the risk of choking if infants are left alone while feeding. Explain the dangers of ‘propping’ a bottle.

Background

 The Food and Drug Regulations set the nutritional composition and labelling of commercial infant formula (referred to throughout as infant formula) sold in Canada. Infant formula is designed to meet the known nutritional requirements of the healthy term infant. The regulations also restrict the food additives that may be used.

Infant formula may contain a number of nutritive substances, such as nucleotides, that are not required under the Food and Drug Regulations. These substances are found in breastmilk, but evidence of their dietary essentiality is lacking. Claims about the health benefits of these substances must be substantiated by acceptable scientific evidence.

All new infant formulas, as well as products that undergo a change in formulation, processing, or packaging, are subject to a premarket notification. Health Canada requires the manufacturer to submit details of the formulation, ingredients, processing, packaging, and labelling for review. Manufacturers must also submit evidence that the formula is nutritionally adequate to support growth and development.

In this section:

Cow milk-based, infant formula

Cow milk-based infant formula is the standard product for healthy term infants who are not exclusively breastfed. The protein in these formulas may be whole milk protein, a combination of casein and whey proteins, or just one of these proteins. Some or all of the protein may be partially hydrolyzed (broken down to smaller peptides).

Iron in formula

Currently, there are cow milk-based infant formulas on the market for term infants that contain iron in the range of 0.4 mg to 1.3 mg per 100 mL. Infant formula containing an amount at the higher end of the range may need to be recommended for infants at risk of iron deficiency (ESPGHAN, 2005).

Lactose-free, cow milk-based formula

For healthy term infants, lactose-free infant formula has no advantage compared to the standard cow milk-based infant formula.

Even in the case of acute gastroenteritis, enough lactose digestion and absorption are usually preserved to continue to use standard cow milk-based infant formula (American Academy of Paediatrics, 2006).

Glucose polymers, usually from corn-syrup solids, replace lactose in this formula. However, lactose-free, cow milk-based infant formula still contains a small amount of residual lactose (a disaccharide containing glucose and galactose). For this reason, they are contraindicated for infants with galactosemia. Nor are they recommended for infants with congenital lactase deficiency, a rare disorder that presents with intractable diarrhea when human milk or lactose-containing formula is consumed. The only formula indicated for infants with galactosemia or congenital lactase deficiency is a soy-based infant formula which contains no lactose.

Lactose-free, cow milk-based infant formula is also unsuitable for infants with confirmed cow milk protein allergy and is ineffective in the dietary management of infant colic.

Formula based on partially hydrolyzed cow milk protein

A number of infant formulas contain protein that has been partially hydrolyzed. Some infant formulas contain a combination of partially hydrolyzed and intact proteins. Currently, there is little evidence to support any benefit of protein hydrolysates to the digestive system of infants compared to standard cow milk-based formula.

The potential benefit of a formula that contains only partially hydrolyzed protein may be a reduced risk of an allergic reaction due to whole cow milk protein (AAP, 2008a). Advise parents to check the label’s ingredients list as some formulas with partially hydrolysed protein also contain whole intact cow milk protein. These infant formulas should not be used for treatment of cow milk protein allergy.

Thickened infant formula

There are some infant formulas available commercially which have been slightly thickened with rice starch. They may be labelled as suitable for infants who spit up frequently. However, spitting up is normal in infancy and only very rarely leads to health problems, such as failure to thrive. Further assessment is warranted if spitting-up persists or increases in severity.

It is not recommended to thicken infant formula during home preparation with the addition of rice cereal (O’Connor, 2009). This will dramatically increase the caloric density of the formula and may lead to inappropriate weight gain. Furthermore, the implications of the early introduction of rice protein into the diet are unknown.

Thickened formula, whether it is commercial or home-prepared, does not measurably decrease symptom frequency among infants with severe reflux, such as gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (Vandenplas et al., 2009).

Essential fatty acids in infant formula

The addition of the fatty acids docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (ARA) to infant formula is not currently mandatory in Canada. However, they are permitted as an optional ingredient. Infant formulas with DHA and ARA have become widely available.

Infant formula is required to contain adequate amounts of the essential fatty acids linoleic acid (omega-6) and alpha-linolenic acid (omega-3). These are the precursors of the long-chain, polyunsaturated fatty acids ARA (omega-6) and DHA (omega-3). Questions remain about an infant’s ability to convert linoleic and alpha-linolenic acids to their long chain derivatives (Hoffman et al., 2000). The DHA and ARA added to infant formula are sourced from algal and fungal oils which have been assessed for safety by Health Canada (Health Canada, 2003). However, evidence is inconclusive on the benefit of including DHA and ARA in formula for healthy term infants (Simmer, Patole, & Rao, 2011).

Nucleotides

Some infant formulas on the market contain added nucleotides. The levels of nucleotides in formula are based on levels found in breastmilk. Human data is lacking on their benefits to infant health (ESPGHAN, 2005).

Live microorganisms

Live microorganisms may be added to infant formula if the microorganism has been assessed as safe for infant use. The addition of live microorganisms to infant formula is intended to mimic the effects of breastmilk on the infant’s gastrointestinal system. However more evidence is needed to substantiate clinical benefits from infant formula supplemented with live microorganisms (Lee & Seppo, 2009).

Soy-based infant formula

Cow milk-based infant formula is recommended for an infant who is not exclusively fed breastmilk. Soy-based infant formula is indicated only for infants who have galactosemia or who cannot consume dairy-based products for cultural or religious reasons. The Canadian Paediatric Society recommends the use of an infant formula based on extensively hydrolyzed protein for the formula-fed infant with a cow milk protein allergy (CPS, 2009). When a diagnosis of non-IgE-mediated cow milk protein allergy can be ruled out, the use of soy-based infant formula may be considered (CPS, 2009).

The soy-based infant formula currently available has been shown to support normal growth and nutritional status in the first year. No overt toxicities have been observed in healthy infants fed these formulas as their sole source of nutrition (Nutrition Committee, CPS, 2009; Badger et al., 2009). The American Academy of Pediatrics states that there is no conclusive evidence from studies with animals or humans that dietary soy isoflavones adversely affect human development, reproduction or endocrine function (AAP, 2008b). The National Toxicology Program Board of Scientific Counsellors concluded that there is minimal concern regarding adverse developmental effects in humans due to the presence of estrogenic isoflavones (phytoestrogens) in soy infant formula, but found that there was insufficient information from studies in humans to reach a conclusion on potential adversity (National Toxicology Program, 2009).

Formulas for special medical purposes

Some infant formulas are intended for use only under medical supervision. They include formulas for the dietary management of conditions such as aminoacidurias and severe malabsorption syndromes. They also include formulas for preterm infants. These products are not generally available at the retail level. They are not for healthy term infants and are beyond the scope of this statement.

Formulas for preterm infants on discharge from hospital may be available at the retail level. Advise parents that they are not appropriate for healthy term infants.

Infant formula with extensively hydrolyzed protein

Infant formula based on extensively hydrolyzed protein is generally available at the retail level. It is intended for infants who have physician-confirmed food allergies or malabsorption syndromes and cannot tolerate formula based on intact cow milk protein or soy protein. The protein in this formula has been extensively broken down to the small peptide and amino acid level. Currently, the protein source is casein.

There is some evidence that formula with extensively hydrolyzed protein, in comparison to formula with intact cow milk protein, may delay or prevent atopic dermatitis in early childhood in infants who are at high risk of developing atopic disease (AAP, 2008a). More research is needed to determine whether the benefit of using a formula with hydrolyzed protein extends beyond early childhood (AAP, 2008a).

Formula based on extensively hydrolyzed protein has provoked allergic reactions in highly allergic infants. For these infants, an amino acid-based infant formula may be recommended (Hill, Cameron, Francis, Gonzalez-Andaza, & Hosking, 1995; Saylor & Bahna, 1991).

Other milks

Cow milk and other animal milks, including goat milk, are not appropriate alternatives to breastmilk for young infants (WHO, 2009). Cow and goat milks differ greatly from human breastmilk because they:

  • are low in iron
  • are low in essential fatty acids and other essential nutrients
  • contain a less-digestible form of protein
  • have a high renal solute load.

In infants under six months of age, the use of cow milk is associated with occult blood loss in stool, which can contribute to iron deficiency anaemia (Christofides, Schauer, & Zlotkin, 2005).

Unpasteurized cow or goat milk (raw milk) should never be offered due to the risk of food-borne illness from pathogens such as, Salmonella, Escherichia coli, Campylobacter, and Listeria monocytogenes (Health Canada, 2010b; Infectious Diseases and Immunization Committee, 2008).

Home-made formulas made from canned, evaporated, whole milk (cow or goat) are not recommended as a breastmilk substitute. They are nutritionally incomplete (Briend, 2006; WHO, 2009). These formulas should only be considered for emergency, short-term use. They must be prepared safely, following directions from WHO’s Infant Feeding in Emergencies (WHO, 2007).

Soy, rice or other plant-based beverages, even when they are fortified, are not appropriate as a breastmilk substitute because they are nutritionally incomplete for infants. Consumption of these beverages by young infants may result in failure to thrive (Tierney et al, 2010).

Safe preparation and storage

Young infants are vulnerable to food-borne illness. Proper preparation and storage of infant formula is very important to reduce the risk. Sterilization of all infant feeding equipment is recommended. Instruct parents and caregivers to:

  • Clean kitchen surfaces and wash hands thoroughly with soap and warm water.
  • Thoroughly wash bottles, nipples, caps, tongs, measuring cups or other containers.
  • Sterilize the washed equipment by boiling in an open pot of clean water for two minutes and allow to air dry and cool (Health Canada, 2010c).
  • Avoid cross-contamination from other foods prepared in the kitchen.

Liquid formula

Liquid infant formula is heat-treated to be sterile. It is available in ready-to-feed formats or as a liquid concentrate. Ready-to-feed infant formula is the safest choice for higher-risk infants who are formula fed, including low birth weight and immuno-compromised infants. Although the liquid formula is sterile, parents and caregivers should follow the manufacturer’s directions for preparation and storage, and avoid cross-contamination.

Opened cans of liquid infant formula should be covered and refrigerated immediately.

Liquid concentrate infant formula must be prepared by adding water according to manufacturer’s directions.

Powdered formula

Powdered infant formula is not sterile. It has been linked to outbreaks of Cronobacter sakazakiiand Salmonella enterica, mainly in high-risk infants (WHO, 2006). If liquid infant formula is not available or accessible, powdered infant formula can be used if it is properly prepared.

Advise parents and caregivers as follows:

  • If the powdered infant formula will be fed immediately after preparation, it is safe to mix the powder with previously boiled water that has been cooled to room temperature (25oC) (Health Canada, 2010c).
  • If they are preparing more than one bottle in advance, advise them to follow the guidelines for Preparation, Storage and Handling of Powdered Infant Formula (Health Canada, 2010c). These guidelines recommend mixing the powdered infant formula with very hot water (boiled and cooled to no less than 70°C) to kill any harmful bacteria. Infant formula prepared in this manner can be stored in the refrigerator for up to 24 hours.  Infant formula should be used within 2 hours from the start of a feeding and any leftovers should be discarded.

Water

Municipal tap water and commercially bottled water (except carbonated or mineral waters) are suitable for preparing powdered or concentrated infant formulas. There is no indication for the use of distilled water.

Concentrated liquid or powdered infant formula can be reconstituted with fluoridated tap water. However, if the families are located in an area with naturally occurring high levels of fluoride (higher than the guideline of 1.5 mg/L), recommend they use a different source of drinking water with a lower fluoride concentration.

Well water that is regularly tested and meets standards of safety is also suitable. However, the nitrate concentration of well water should be monitored to ensure it is below 45 mg/L (or 10 mg/L measured as nitrate-nitrogen), to prevent health risks to infants.

Tap water, well water, and commercially bottled water are not sterile. Home water treatment equipment does not replace the need to sterilize water for infants. To ensure water for infants is safe and pathogen-free, advise parents and caregivers to:

  1. Use cold tap water. Hot tap water may contain metal contaminants, such as lead from the pipes.
  2. Bring water to a rolling boil.
  3. Continue to boil for 2 minutes.
  4. Let cool.

For detailed instructions for parents and caregivers on the safe preparation of infant formula see the Healthy Canadians website.

Supervision of a feeding infant

Breastfeeding allows close, skin-to-skin contact and constant attention to infants during feeding. When an infant is not breastfed, skin to skin contact should still be encouraged while feeding.

Formula-fed infants, like breastfed infants, need to feed ‘on-cue‘, according to their appetite and satiety. Infants should not be encouraged to empty the bottle at a feeding (Institute of Medicine, 2011).

Feeding from a bottle or cup must always be supervised. Strongly discourage the use of a propped bottle to feed an unattended infant. There is a danger of choking or aspiration, because the flow of milk into the mouth may be too rapid. This practice also increases the risk of overfeeding, since the infant cannot stop the feeding (Institute of Medicine, 2011). Even older infants who are able to hold a bottle benefit from being held when feeding. In addition, the use of a bottle as a pacifier should be discouraged, particularly at bedtime. There is a risk of ‘nursing bottle syndrome’ and early childhood tooth decay (Health Canada 2009).

References

American Academy of Paediatrics Committee on Nutrition. (2006). Lactose intolerance in infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatrics, 118(3): 1279-1286.

American Academy of Pediatrics. (2008a). Effects of early nutritional interventions on the development of atopic disease in infants and children: The role of maternal dietary restriction, breastfeeding, timing of introduction of complementary foods, and hydrolyzed formulas. Pediatrics, 121; 183-191.

American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition. (2008b). Use of soy protein formulas in infant feeding. Pediatrics, 121(5):1062-1068.

Badger, T.M., Gilchrist, J.M., Pivik, T.R., Andres, A., Shankar, K., Chen, J., & Ronis, M.J. (2009). The health implications of soy infant formula. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 89(suppl): 1668S-72S.

Briend, A. (2006).  Home-modified animal milk for replacement feeding: Is it feasible and safe? Discussion paper for technical consultation on HIV and infant feeding.

Canadian Paediatric Society Nutrition and Gastroenterology Committee. (2010). Human milk banking. Paediatrics & Child Health, 15(9): 595-598.

Canadian Paediatric Society Nutrition Committee. (2009). Concerns for the use of soy-based formulas in infant nutrition. Paediatrics & Child Health, 14(3):109-13.

Christofides, A., Schauer, C., & Zlotkin, S.H. (2005). Iron deficiency and anemia prevalence and associated etiologic risk factors in First Nations and Inuit communities in Northern Ontario and Nunavut. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 96. 304-307.

European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Committee on Nutrition. (2005). Global standard for the composition of infant formula: Recommendations of an ESPGHAN coordinated international expert group. Journal  of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 41:584-599.

Health Canada. (2010a). Health Canada raises concerns about the use of unprocessed human milk.

Health Canada. (2010b). Tip sheet for raw milk.

Hill, D.J., Cameron, D.J.S., Francis, D.E.M., Gonzalez-Andaza, A.M., & Hosking, C.S. (1995). Challenge confirmation of late-onset reactions to extensively hydrolyzed formulas with multiple food protein intolerance. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 96:386-394.

 Hoffman, D.R.,  Birch, E.E.,  Birch, D.G.,  Uauy, R.,  Castañeda, Y.S.,  Lapus, M.G., &  Wheaton, D.H. (2000). Impact of early dietary intake and blood lipid composition of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids on later visual development. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Nov;31(5):540-53.

Infectious Diseases and Immunization Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society. (2008). Foodborne infections. Paediatrics & Child Health, 14(6): 779-82.

Institute of Medicine. (2011). Early Childhood Obesity Prevention Policies. Chapter 4, pp. 90-92. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Lee, Y.K. & Seppo, S. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of Probiotics and Prebiotics (2nd Ed.). Chapter 1, pp. 94-95. John Wiley & Sons Inc.

National Toxicology Program. (2009). Draft CERHR (Centre for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction) expert panel on soy formula. US Department of Health and Human Services.

Nutrition Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society. (2009). Concerns for the use of soy-based infant formulas in infant nutrition. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 14(3): 109-13.

O’Connor, N.( 2009). Infant Formula. American Family Physician, 79(7): 565-570.

Saylor, J.D. & Bahna, S.L. (1991). Anaphylaxis to casein hydrolysate formula. Journal of Pediatrics,118: 71-74.

Simmer, K., Patole, S.K., & Rao, S.C. (2011). Longchain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation in infants born at term. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Issue 12, Art. No.: CD000376.

Tierney, E.P., Sage, R.J., & Shwayder, T. (2010). Kwashiorkor from a severe dietary restriction in an 8-month infant in suburban Detroit, Michigan: Case report and review of the literature. International Journal of Dermatology, 49:500-506

Vandenplas, Y., Rudolph, C.D., Di Lorenzo, C., Hassall, E., Liptak, G., Mazur, L., Sondheimer, J., Staiano, A., Thomson, M., Veereman-Wauters, G., & Wenzl, T.G. (2009). Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux clinical practice guidelines: Joint recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN). Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 49(4):498-547.

World Health Organization. (2007). Infant feeding in emergencies.

World Health Organizaton. (2006). Safe preparation, storage and handling of powdered infant formula guidelines. Geneva: WHO.

World Health Organization. (2009). Infant and young child feeding (model chapter for textbooks for medical students and allied health professionals). Geneva: WHO.

In practice: Talking to families about infant nutrition

Why is infant-led feeding (also known as ‘on-cue’ feeding) important?

Breastfeeding is a system of demand and supply. To establish good breastmilk production and flow, infants need to feed ‘on-cue’. Timed feedings, and restricting or delaying feedings, should be avoided (Kent et al., 2006). The goal in infant-led feeding is for the mother to recognize and respond to the infant’s appetite, hunger, and fullness cues. Hunger cues include restlessness, rooting, or sucking on a hand.

Infants who are fed when they are hungry, and suckling effectively, will obtain what they need for satisfactory growth. Infant-led breastfeeding, as opposed to bottle-feeding, encourages self-regulation. It may protect against a tendency to over-feed in late infancy (Li, Fein, & Grummer-Strawn, 2010).

How can I reassure parents that a breastfed infant is nourished and growing well?

Parents need reassurance and confidence that their infant is breastfeeding well and growing normally. Mothers give “not enough breastmilk” as the most common reason for stopping breastfeeding (Health Canada, 2012). But in fact, insufficient breastmilk production is rare. In most cases the lack of milk is perceived rather than real (Gatti, 2008; Lewallen et al., 2006; Thulier & Mercer, 2009).

In the first two weeks, newborns experience normal weight decline and recovery (Macdonald, Ross, Grant, & Young, 2003). During this initial period, a trained professional, such as a maternal-child or public health nurse, midwife, or International Board Certified Lactation Consultant, can observe breastfeeding technique and assess latch or other suspected problems.

After the first couple of weeks, when an infant has regained his or her birth weight, steady weight gain is a good indicator of the adequacy of the infant’s intake. Infants are expected to gain weight at the rate of about 0.6 to 1.4 kg per month for the first three months (WHO, 2011). The rate is slower from three to six months: about 0.3 to 0.8 kg per month.

Some infants will gain more and some less. Proper growth assessment requires knowledge of the infant’s growth pattern and their placement on the growth chart.

If a mother needs to temporarily stop breastfeeding because of medical condition or treatment, how can she maintain her milk supply?

During a temporary interruption, mothers can express milk manually or with a breast pump, six to eight times per day. There should be no interval longer than four to six hours between pumpings. Expressing breastmilk prevents engorgement and maintains the mother’s milk supply (Riordan & Wambach, 2010). Once the mother is ready to breastfeed, she can resume.

What dietary advice can I offer a breastfeeding mother?

The quality of the mother’s diet is important for her health and energy. Day to day diet quality, however, does not affect milk production and has little effect on milk composition for most nutrients. Milk composition relies primarily on the mother’s nutrient stores (Riordan & Wambach, 2010). While breastfeeding her infant, a mother should consume more nutrients to conserve her stores, and enough fluids to satisfy her thirst. Most often, her nutritional needs can be met with a balanced diet following the  advice for breastfeeding women in Eating Well with Canada’s Food Guide and Eating Well with Canada’s Food Guide First Nations, Inuit and Métis.

Severe dieting for weight loss should be discouraged. Rapid weight loss can reduce the mother’s milk supply (Riordan & Wambach, 2010).

Restricting common allergenic foods from a breastfeeding mother’s diet has not been shown to prevent food allergies in infants at high risk for atopy and is not recommended for this purpose (AAP, 2008; ESPGHAN, 2008; SP-EAACI, 2008).

How can I use points of contact with expectant and new mothers to educate and support them to breastfeed?

With prospective parents, explore their attitudes, values, and beliefs about breastfeeding. The health professional’s attitude toward this topic is also critical. Inconsistent, unfavourable – or even neutral — attitudes towards breastfeeding on the part of health professionals are negatively associated with breastfeeding duration (Thulier & Mercer, 2009). Discuss concerns and correct misinformation to support fully informed decisions about infant feeding.

At the first prenatal visit, ask expectant mothers about their intention to breastfeed using open-ended questions such as “What do you know about breastfeeding?” Provide written information  Ten Great Reasons to Breastfeed Your Baby on the importance of breastfeeding to the mother and infant. For those who say they do not intend to breastfeed, explore their attitudes and beliefs towards breastfeeding and talk about the importance of breastfeeding even for a short period.

At the time of birth, ensure early skin to skin contact for at least one hour. Provide rooming-in and support infant-led, unrestricted, and exclusive breastfeeding, with no supplemental feedings unless medically indicated.

Before discharge, ensure that parents understand how they will feed their infant and that they receive written information Ten Valuable Tips for Successful Breastfeeding.. The information should explain the signs that their infant is feeding and growing well, as well as information on community breastfeeding resources. Advise mothers that feeding from bottles or using pacifiers may interfere with establishing breastfeeding. Help them to access resources in the community such as peer counsellors and International Board Certified Lactation Consultants.

At the mother’s first post-partum visit, arrange for a skilled practitioner to observe the infant breastfeeding. Offer counselling about what to expect in terms of normal infant growth and increases in breastfeeding demand and when to seek further breastfeeding support or medical help.

What supports are important for breastfeeding women and their families?

Skilled support from a combination of professionals and trained peers or laypeople helps breastfeeding mothers and infants as they transition between the hospital and community services and beyond (Thulier & Mercer, 2009; Wijndaele, Lakshman, Landsbaugh, Ong, & Ogilvie, 2009; Britton, McCormick, Renfrew, Wade, & King, 2007).

Peer support groups and community networks, such as La Leche League Canada, give mothers and families the opportunity to share breastfeeding practices and experiences. Such networks enhance their knowledge and confidence about breastfeeding (Morrow et al., 1999).

International Board Certified Lactation Consultants and public health nurses provide support to breastfeeding mothers in the community with home visits, counselling, and resource referrals (Thurman & Allen, 2008).

Community health programs, such as those funded through the  Canada Prenatal Nutrition Program, provide breastfeeding education and support, and have also been shown to improve initiation and maintenance of breastfeeding among their participants (PHAC, 2009).

The community at large can further support breastfeeding as the normal way of feeding infants ‘anytime and anywhere’. Community support helps to protect breastfeeding mothers and infants from discrimination and harassment. Members of the community can be made aware that restrictions on breastfeeding may be grounds for complaints on the basis of gender or sex discrimination under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms or provincial, territorial or federal human rights legislation.

What advice should I offer on the texture of first foods?

At six months of age, infants can be offered foods with more of a semi-solid texture. The texture of the food should be gradually increased over the next few months. Meats such as beef, lamb, game, poultry, and fish, as well as alternatives such as eggs, tofu, and legumes, can be easily and inexpensively prepared at home by cooking until tender and mashing with a fork or mincing finely with a knife or food grinder. Both meat and cereal were shown to have similar acceptability and tolerance when offered to infants as first complementary foods (Krebs et al., 2006).

Should parents be concerned about offering infants foods that are considered common allergens?

Delaying the introduction of priority food allergens is not currently recommended as a way to prevent food allergies, including for infants at risk for atopy (AAP, 2008, ESPGHAN, 2008, Alm et al., 2009; Koplin et al., 2010; Palmer & Prescott, 2012). Common food allergens that are a source of iron, such as fish and whole eggs, can be introduced at about six months of age.

Note: Health care providers should deal with cases where there is a family history of food allergy on an individual basis.

Note: All nuts, as well as seeds or fish with whole bones are choking hazards. Never feed whole nuts, seeds, thick spreads or spoons of nut butter, or fish with whole (unmashed) bones to infants. Instruct parents on age appropriate ways to introduce these foods to minimize risk.

Do infants under six months need iron supplements?

Current opinion suggests that iron supplements are not generally needed for breastfed infants during the first six months. However, there is concern that some healthy, full-term and exclusively breastfed infants are at an increased risk of iron deficiency (Baker, Greer & Committee on Nutrition, 2010).

Infants with lower iron stores are at higher risk of iron deficiency. These infants include those with a birth weight of less than 3000 grams, and those born to iron-deficient mothers, mothers with diabetes, or mothers who consumed excess alcohol during pregnancy (Berglund, Westrup, & Domellof, 2010; Georgieff et al., 1990; Carter, Jacobson, Molteno, & Jacobson, 2007; Yang et al., 2009). Infants who are not fed according to current recommendations are also at higher risk of iron deficiency, such as those fed homemade evaporated milk formula or cow milk (Christofides, Schauer, & Zlotkin, 2005).

Since there is a potential for the development of iron deficiency in some healthy term infants born with lower iron stores, case-selecting infants for testing is a way to assess those who may benefit from supplementation with oral iron drops before six months of age. Further research is needed to more clearly delineate the prevalence of iron deficiency in infancy and determine the best strategies to manage this issue.

What should parents look for when buying a vitamin D supplement?

A single vitamin D3 supplement (without other vitamins) in a liquid (drop) format is recommended for infants. Other vitamin D products such as vitamin D2 or a multivitamin (which contains vitamin D) are not suggested.

Vitamin D supplements are sold over-the-counter in pharmacies and some grocery stores. Some families may qualify for subsidized supplements. For example, First Nations or Inuit people may be eligible to receive vitamin supplements through the Non-Insured Health Benefits Program.

Can breastfeeding mothers take a vitamin D supplement instead of giving it to the infant?

Current guidelines advise women of childbearing age to take a daily multivitamin, which provides between 5 and 20 µg (200 – 800 IU) of vitamin D. This level of supplementation is unlikely to sufficiently increase the concentration of vitamin D in a mother’s breastmilk to meet the infant’s needs (Wagner & Greer, 2008). A small number of studies have investigated the efficacy of supplementing breastfeeding mothers with high doses of vitamin D to prevent rickets in their infants (Wagner & Greer, 2008). However, more research is needed on this approach before making a change to practice recommendations.

If infants are both breastfeeding and getting some formula, should they be given a vitamin D supplement?

Non-breastfed infants do not require a vitamin D supplement because the infant formula contains vitamin D.

Infants who are partially breastfed should receive a vitamin D supplement of 10µg (400 IU). They should get this amount regardless of their average formula intake. Their total intake from supplement and formula is not likely to exceed the upper level of 25 µg (1000 IU) per day.

Should an infant with jaundice continue to be breastfed?

Yes, an infant with jaundice should generally continue to be breastfed.

Jaundice is a yellow colouration of the infant’s sclera and skin caused by increased bilirubin levels in the body.  It is common during the first few days after birth. Very high levels of jaundice can lead to permanent neurological damage. However, interventions can be very effective if instituted early. Several factors can cause jaundice including hemolysis, infections, and liver and metabolic diseases. In the first days after birth, some infants may also develop jaundice if there is trouble with the initiation of breastfeeding or the supply of breastmilk is low. All jaundiced infants should be assessed by an experienced health professional to determine if the level of jaundice requires therapy and to determine the cause. It is important that the mothers and infants receive support to ensure breastfeeding is not compromised during this critical period.

Up to 15% of breastfed infants will display jaundice related to breastmilk in the second and third week, which can then persist for several weeks (Winfield & MacFaul, 1978; Kelly & Stanton, 1995). Any infant with jaundice at two to three weeks of age should be promptly referred for evaluation by an experienced health professional to ensure there is no other cause for the persistent jaundice; such as hemolysis, metabolic problems and biliary atresia (Moyer et al., 2004). It is important that it not be assumed without evaluation that the jaundice is secondary to breastmilk, as other potential causes include life-threatening conditions, and early diagnosis can significantly improve outcomes. It is also very important that breastfeeding continue during the evaluation. If it is determined that jaundice is due to the breastmilk, there is no need for further intervention and breastfeeding should continue without interruption.

Are herbal teas suggested for infants?

At this time, there is insufficient evidence on efficacy and safety of herbal teas to warrant their use during infancy.  Some parents and caregivers may use herbal teas to help with infant conditions such as colic (Zhang, Fein, & Fein, 2011). However, the use of these products is not without risk, as they may have pharmacologic actions. They frequently contain sugar and alcohol, and may interfere with breastfeeding. The composition of herbal teas varies considerably among products.

What advice should I give to a breastfeeding mother about alcohol or smoking?

Advise mothers to limit their alcohol intake, particularly with newborns because of their rapidly developing central nervous system and underdeveloped ability to metabolize alcohol (Butt, Beirness, Cesa, Gliksman, Paradis, & Stockwell, 2011). Alcohol can alter the milk let-down reflex and decrease the amount of milk consumed by the infant (Giglia & Binns, 2006; Chien, Huang, Hsu, Chao, & Liu, 2009; Mennella, 2001). With daily exposure, it may also affect the infant’s short-term sleep patterns (Giglia & Binns, 2006, Mennella & Garcia-Gomez, 2001). Frequent or heavy drinking can impair the mother’s judgment and functioning. Although there is no known “safe” amount of alcohol in breastmilk, occasional moderate alcohol intake is compatible with breastfeeding.

Advise a mother to stop or reduce smoking. Smoking can affect milk production (Fríguls et al., 2010) and may negatively impact infant growth (Little, Lambert, Worthington-Roberts, & Ervin, 1994; Boshuizen et al., 1998) and infant sleep patterns in the short-term (Mennella, Yourshaw, & Morgan, 2007).

If a mother continues to smoke, advise her that breastfeeding remains important for her infant’s health and may mitigate some of the negative effects of exposure to tobacco smoke on the infant (Chatzimichael et al., 2007; Woodward, Douglas, Graham, & Miles, 1990; Ladomenou, Kafatos, & Galanakis, 2009).

Smokers in the household should go outside to smoke, but always ensure the infant is supervised in their absence.

References

American Academy of Pediatrics. (2008). Effects of early nutritional interventions on the development of atopic disease in infants and children: The role of maternal dietary restriction, breastfeeding, timing of introduction of complementary foods, and hydrolyzed formulas. Pediatrics, 121; 183-191.

Alm, B., Aberg, N., Erdes, L., Mollborg, P., Pettersson, R. Norvenius, S.G., Goksor, E. Wennergren, G. (2009). Early introduction of fish decreases the risk of eczema in infants. Arch Dis Child, 94:11-15.

Baker, R.D., Greer, F.R. and the Committee on Nutrition. (2010). Clinical report diagnosis and prevention of iron deficiency and iron-deficiency anemia in infants and young children (0-3 years of age). Pediatrics, 126(5):1-11.

Berglund, S., Westrup, B., & Domellof, M. (2010). Iron supplements reduce the risk of iron deficiency anemia in marginally low birthweight infants. Pediatrics, 126. e874-e883.

Boshuizen, H.C., Verkerk, P.H., Reerink, J.D., Herngreen, W.P., Zaadstra, B.M., & Verloove-Vanhorick, S.P. (1998).  Maternal smoking during lactation: Relation to growth during the first year of life in a Dutch birth cohort.  American Journal of Epidemiology, 15;147(2):117-26.

Britton, C., McCormick, F.M., Renfrew, M.J., Wade, A., & King, S.E. (2007). Support for breastfeeding mothers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Issue 1. Art. NO.: CD001141. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001141.pub3.

Butt, P., Beirness, D., Cesa, F., Gliksman, L., Paradis, C., & Stockwell, T. (2011). Alcohol and health in Canada: A summary of evidence and guidelines for low risk drinking. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.

Carter, R.C., Jacobson, S., Molteno, C., & Jacobson, J. (2007). Fetal alcohol exposure, iron-deficiency anemia, and infant growth. Pediatrics, 120. 559-567.

Chatzimichael, A., Tsalkidis, A., Cassimos, D., Gardikis, S., Tripsianis, G., Deftereos, S., Ktenidou-Kartali, S., & Tsanakas, I. (2007). The role of breastfeeding and passive smoking on the development of severe bronchiolitis in infants. Minerva Pediatrica, Jun; 59(3):199-206.

Chien, Y.C., Huang, Y.J., Hsu, C.S., Chao, J.C., & Liu, J.F. (2009). Maternal lactation characteristics after consumption of an alcoholic soup during the postpartum ‘doing-the-month’ ritual. Public Health Nutrition,  Mar; 12(3):382-8.

Christofides, A., Schauer, C., & Zlotkin, S.H. (2005). Iron deficiency and anemia prevalence and associated etiologic risk factors in First Nations and Inuit communities in northern Ontario and Nunavut. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 96. 304-307.

ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. (2008). Complementary feeding: A commentary by the ESPGHAN. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 46:99-110.

Fríguls, B., Joya, X., García-Algar, O., Pallás, C.R., Vall, O., & Pichini, S. (2010).  A comprehensive review of assay methods to determine drugs in breast milk and the safety of breastfeeding when taking drugs. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 397(3):1157-79.

Gatti, L. (2008). Maternal perceptions of insufficient milk supply in breastfeeding. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 40:4, 355-363.

Georgieff, M.K., Landon, M.B., Mills, M.M., Hedlund, B.E., Faassen, A.E., Schmidt, R.L., Ophoven, J.J. & Widness, J.A. (1990). Abnormal iron distribution in infants of diabetic mothers: Spectrum and maternal antecedents. Journal of Pediatrics, 117(3): 455-61.

Giglia, R. & Binns, C. (2006). Alcohol and lactation: A systematic review. Nutrition & Dietetics, 63:103-116.

Kelly, D.A. & Stanton, A. (1995). Jaundice in babies: Implications for community screening for biliary atresia. BMJ, 310:1172-3.

Kent, J.C., Mitoulas, L.R., Cregan, M.D., Ramsay, D.T., Doherty, D.A., & Hartmann, P.E. (2006). Volume and frequency of breastfeedings and fat content of breast milk throughout the day. Pediatrics, 117. e387-e395.

Koplin, J.J., Osborne, N.J., Wake, M., Martin, P.E., Gurrin, L.C., Robinson, M.N., Tey, D., Slaa, M. Thiele, L., Miles, L., Anderson, D., Tan, T., Dang, T.D., Hill, D.J., Lowe, A.J., Matheson, M.C., Ponsonby, A-L., Tang, M.L., Dharmage, S.C., Allen, K.J. (2010). Can early introduction of egg prevent egg allergy in infants? A population based study. J allergy Clin immunol, 126: 807-13.

Krebs, N.F., Westcott, J.E., Butler, N., Robinson, C., Bell, M., & Hambidge, K.M. (2006). Meat as a first complementary food for breastfed infants: Feasibility and impact on zinc intake and status.  journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 42:207-214.

Ladomenou, F., Kafatos, A., Galanakis, E. (2009). Environmental tobacco smoke exposure as a risk factor for infections in infancy. Acta Paediatrica, 98. 1137-1141.

Lewallen, L.P., Dick, M.J., Flowers, J., Powell, W., Zickefoose, K.T., Wall, Y.G., & Price, Z.M. (2006). Breastfeeding support and early cessation. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, Mar-Apr; 35(2):166-72.

Li, R., Fein, S., & Grummer-Strawn, L. (2010). Do infants fed from bottles lack self-regulation of milk intake compared with directly breastfed infants? Pediatrics, 125: e1386 – e1393.

Little, R. E., Lambert, M. D., Worthington-Roberts, B., & Ervin, C. H. (1994). Maternal smoking during lactation: Relation to infant size at one year of age. American Journal of Epidemiology, 140:544-554.

Macdonald, P.D., Ross, S.R., Grant, L., & Young, D. (2003). Neonatal weight loss in breast and formula fed infants. Archives of disease in childhood: Fetal and neonatal edition, 88(6). F472-F476.

Mennella, J.A. & Garcia-Gomez, P.L. (2001). Sleep disturbances after acute exposure to alcohol in mothers’ milk. Alcohol, 25(3):153-8.

Mennella, J.A., Yourshaw, LM, & Morgan, L.K. (2007). Breastfeeding and smoking: Short-term effects on infant feeding and sleep. Pediatrics 120 (3):497-502.

Mennella, J.A. (2001). Regulation of milk intake after exposure to alcohol in mothers’ milk. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 25(4):590-3.

Morrow, A.L., Lourdes Guerrero, M., Shults, J., Calva, J.J., Lutter, C., Bravo, J., Ruiz-Palacios, G., Morrow, R.C., & Butterfoss, F.D. (1999). Efficacy of home-based peer counseling to promote exclusive breastfeeding: A randomized controlled trial. The Lancet, 353. 1226-1231.
Moyer, V.,  Freese, D.K.,  Whitington, P.F.,  Olson, A.D.,  Brewer, F.,  Colletti, R.B., &  Heyman, M.B. (2004). Guideline for the evaluation of cholestatic jaundice in infants: Recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. Journal of  Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 39(2). 115-28.

Palmer, D.J. & Prescott, S.L. (2012). Does early feeding promote development of oral tolerance? Curr Allergy Asthma Rep, 12.321-331.

Public Health Agency of Canada. (2009). Summative evaluation of the Canada prenatal nutrition program, 2004-2009.

Riordan, J. & Wambach, K. (2010). Breastfeeding and human lactation. Sudbury MA.: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Inc. pp. 497-518.

SP-EAACI (Section on Paediatrics, European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology). (2008). Dietary prevention of allergic diseases in infants and small children. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 19. 1-4.

Thulier, D. and Mercer, J. (2009).Variables associated with breastfeeding duration. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 38, 259-268

Thurman, S.E. & Allen, P.J. (2008). Integrating lactation consultants into primary health care services: Are lactation consultants affecting breastfeeding success? Pediatric Nursing, 24(5). 419-425.

Wagner, C.L. & Greer, F.R. (2008). Prevention of rickets and vitamin D deficiency in infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatrics. 122. 1142-1152.

Wijndaele, K., Lakshman, R., Landsbaugh, J.R., Ong, K.K., & Ogilvie, D. (2009). Determinants of early weaning and use of unmodified cow’s milk in infants: A systematic review. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 109(12):2017-28.

Winfield, C.R., MacFaul, R. (1978). Clinical study of jaundice in breast and bottle fed babies. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 53:506-7.

Woodward, A., Douglas, R.M., Graham, N.M.H., & Miles, H. (1990). Acute respiratory illness in Adelaide children: Breast feeding modifies the effect of passive smoking. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 44:224-230.

World Health Organization. (2011).  Child growth standards – Weight velocity.

Yang, Z., Lonnerdal, B., Adu-Afarwuah, S., Brown, K., Chapparro, C., Cohen, R., Domelloff, M., Hernell, O., Lartey, A., & Dewey, K. (2009). Prevalence and predictors of iron deficiency in fully breastfed infants at 6 months of age: Comparison data from 6 studies. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 89. 1433-1440.

Zhang, Y., Fein, E.B., & Fein, S.B. (2011). Feeding of dietary botanical supplements and teas to infants in the United States. Pediatrics, 127(6). 1060-1066.

Date modified:

*Original online at https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/canada-food-guide/resources/infant-feeding/nutrition-healthy-term-infants-recommendations-birth-six-months.html