ROTORUA. 26 September 2012. Local bodies will continue to be bombarded with pseudoscience by anti-fluoride campaigners, Dr Stephen Palmer, Medical Officer of Health from the National Fluoride Information Service told the Water New Zealand conference in Rotorua today.
“In the absence of clear facts, pseudoscience works well – as toxicology and epidemiology are so specialised. Yet, these are the very tools that show that fluoridated water supplies are effective in preventing tooth decay, especially for the most disadvantaged sections of the population, and the lower doses used these days are safe,” Dr Palmer told the conference.
His presentation, entitled The Tale of Two Cities, showed how New Plymouth and Lower Hutt responded to sustained and very active campaigns to stop fluoridating their local water supplies.
He said the campaign in New Plymouth overwhelmed local councillors who considered the issue during their 2011 Annual Planning process. “Councillors were subjected to intense pressure from the anti-fluoride lobby using a range of tactics. These included sophisticated videos which were heavy on emotion and conspiracy. Selective use of studies and research findings, downplaying or ignoring evidence, emotion, and misrepresentation of the truth all bamboozled councillors.
“The case put forward by the Taranaki DHB was overwhelmed by the sheer number of submissions and emotion that resulted in a decision to abandon the fluoridation of New Plymouth’s water supply.
“On the other hand, when a similar campaign emerged in the Hutt Valley a rational approach, expert evidence and strong support from the local DHB meant the voice of reason was able to prevail. In the Valley those residents wanting fluoride-free water can still access the Buick Street water pump, but the reticulated water supply remains fluoridated”.
Dr Palmer produced statistics that showed the benefits of fluoridation of water supplies, and warned the largely local body representatives at the conference that the anti-fluoride campaign will continue, populated with its beguiling – but erroneous claims.
“Science is a rigorous process which endeavours to ensure that results are correct and safe. Anti-fluoride campaigners’ messages are not founded on science or fact. They are an excellent example of pseudoscience which might sound clever, but in reality is based on fear, innuendo, convenient half-truths and emotion,” Dr Palmer told the conference.
Print 
PDF