Fluoride Action Network

Fluoride content of still bottled waters available in the North-East of England, UK.

Source: British Dental Journal 195:515–518. | March 3rd, 2003 | Authors: Zohouri F, Maguire A, Moynihan P.
Location: United Kingdom

Key Points

  • Mean fluoride content of all bottled waters sampled was below the accepted standard for optimally fluoridated water.
  • A lack of agreement between the measured fluoride concentration and that displayed on the labels was observed in three-quarters of the samples.
  • When advising children and parent/carers on fluoride therapy, the source of their drinking water (ie tap or boiled) should be taken into consideration.
  • The dental health of a child who drinks bottled waters containing a low level of fluoride, as the main source of drinking water, might be affected as a result of receiving a sub-optimal level of fluoride.


Objective: The aims of this study were to measure the fluoride content of still bottled waters on sale in the UK and to estimate and compare the fluoride intake from tap and bottled water for British children.

Methods: Three bottles of 25 commercial brands of bottled water were purchased from supermarkets, grocery stores and health shops in the North-East of England. All samples were still spring, mineral or distilled waters, sold in plastic bottles. The fluoride content of all samples was determined, in duplicate, using a Fluoride Ion Selective Electrode.

Results: The mean (+/- SD) fluoride content of the bottled waters was 0.08 (+/- 0.08) mg L(-1) with a range from 0.01-0.37 mg L(-1) which is below the accepted standard for optimally fluoridated water. The mean fluoride intake for 4-18-year-olds when the source of water intake is solely fluoridated tap water was estimated to be 0.26 mg F per day; compared with 0.16 mg F per day, when a combination of tap and bottled water is consumed.

Conclusions: Bottled water, from those sampled, is unlikely to make an important contribution to total fluoride intake in British diets. Consumption of bottled water containing a negligible amount of fluoride in preference to fluoridated tap water might result in less than optimal fluoride ingestion in young people.


An adequate intake of fluoride during the pre-eruptive stage of enamel formation has a protective effect against dental caries in later life. However, the predominant beneficial effect of fluoride occurs locally in the mouth, at the tooth surface.1 To reduce the prevalence of dental caries, therefore, fluoride should be taken at intervals throughout the day to maintain adequate levels of fluoride at the tooth surface.

Water, used directly as a drink or indirectly as an addition to beverages and foods, is an important source of ingested fluoride. The results of 120 fluoridation studies from different countries have shown ranges of reductions in dental caries of between 40–60% for permanent teeth and 50–60% for primary teeth in children aged 5 to 15 years who consumed fluoridated water for long periods.2 Although water fluoridation is generally accepted as a means to reduce dental caries in children, adults also benefit from fluoride in their drinking water. Reduction in dental caries has been reported for all age groups up to 65 years when fluoridated water is consumed.3

Traditionally, tap water has made an important contribution to total water intake with between 40–50% of daily water intake coming from this source when the air temperature is less than 21°C.4,5,6,7,8,9,10 However, more recently, there has been a trend to use more natural beverages,11 a developing passion with fitness, greater travel and access to refreshments, as well as moves towards a greater consumption of food outside the home. These changes, as well as the concern about the taste and quality of public water supplies and the potential for contamination of water, has resulted in many people turning to bottled water.12 According to a commercial report in 1995, 800 million litres of bottled water were consumed in the UK and this figure had increased to 1,390 million litres in 2000.13 A further 70% increase in the consumption of bottled water is predicted in the next 5 years.12

The concentration of some elements, such as calcium, sodium, iron, silver and aluminium, in bottled waters is regulated in some countries,14 however there is no regulation regarding the fluoride content of bottled water in the UK or other European countries. Manufacturers are encouraged to list the nutritional contents of their products, but labels stating the fluoride levels of bottled water are not legally required. The fluoride content of bottled waters can be highly variable and this may have oral health implications for those individuals, and especially children, who drink bottled water as their primary source of drinking water.15 A first step toward evaluating how bottled water consumption might affect fluoride exposure is to determine the fluoride content of bottled waters. Some US studies16,17,18,19 have reported the levels of fluoride in bottled waters, most recently in 2000. In addition, there are some data on the fluoride content of bottled waters in the UK20,21 and Europe22,23 but the data from the UK are no longer current. In the 1982 UK study by McFadyen et al.,20 14 still bottled water samples were examined and fluoride levels ranged from 0.10–0.31 mg L?1. Toumba et al.21 in 1994 reported values ranging from 0.10–0.80 mg L?1 for 12 samples. In view of the expanding range of bottled waters available for purchase in the UK and since the most recent analysis of the fluoride levels of bottled water sold in the UK was conducted almost 10 years ago, the objective of the present study was to provide up-to-date information on the fluoride content of the range of bottled waters currently on sale in the UK. The second aim of this study was to estimate the effect of consumption of bottled water on the fluoride exposure of children in the UK. These data should be of use to dentists both in clinical practice and dental public health, providing them with current information necessary when advising on fluoride supplementation both on an individual and community basis.

Material and methods

Twenty-five commercial brands of bottled waters were chosen from those available in the major supermarkets, grocery stores and health shops in North-East England. Three bottles of each brand, each with a different batch number and date of bottling were purchased. The samples were still spring, mineral or distilled waters, and all were sold in plastic bottles.

After shaking the bottle of water, a 1.0 ml sample was taken and mixed with 0.1 ml of Total Ionic Strength Adjusting Buffer III (product 94-09-11, Orion).24 The fluoride concentrations of all 75 samples were determined, in duplicate, using a Fluoride Ion Selective Electrode (model 96-09, ATI Orion) in conjunction with an ISE Meter (Model 720A, ATI Orion). Fluoride standards ranging from 0.01 to 1.00 mg L?1 fluoride were used to calibrate the measurement. The pH of the water samples was also measured using a pH-meter (Model 240, Corning).

One batch number (out of three) for each of the 25 waters was randomly selected and the samples re-analysed to assess the reliability of the method.

The water intake data from the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS),10 2000 was used to estimate daily fluoride intakes based on the results of this study.

Data management

Final calculation of the fluoride content of water samples from the ISE meter readings (in mV) was carried out in Microsoft Excel 97 using logarithmic regression. SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 8) was used to derive descriptive data.


Of the 25 bottled waters tested, 84% had their source or production site in England, Scotland or France (Table 1). Table 1 also lists the most common brands of bottled water according to type of source (ie natural, spring or distilled), fluoride concentration (mg F L?1) the labelled content fluoride (if labelled) and pH. The reliability of the method of fluoride analysis was determined to be 99%. The mean (± SD) fluoride content of the 25 still bottled waters was 0.08 (± 0.08) mg F L?1 with a range from 0.01–0.37 mg F L?1. The highest mean concentration was found in bottled water from Scotland, Deeside (ASDA) which had a mean fluoride content of 0.37 mg F L?1 (± 0.14). No substantial difference in fluoride concentration was found between samples from differing countries of origin. The mean fluoride concentrations of samples from Wales, Ireland, England, Scotland, Canada and France were 0.04, 0.04, 0.06, 0.10, 0.10, and 0.11 mg F L?1 respectively.

Table 1 Fluoride content of 25 still bottled waters (Mean ±SD values for 6 samples)

Regarding the quality of the labelling of bottled waters, 17 of the water samples (68%) did not state the fluoride concentration on the label (Table 1), while of the eight labelled samples, six did not display precise values for fluoride content. For one sample (St. George’s Well) the displayed fluoride concentration on the label was far above the level measured in this study — it was labelled 4.05 mg F L?1 compared with a measured fluoride content of 0.05 mg F L?1 (Table 1).

There were no considerable differences between three batch numbers for each brand (Table 2)), except for the bottled water samples from Superdrug which contained 0.10, 0.01 and 0.02 mg F L?1. The mean pH of the water samples tested was 8.00 with a range from 7.22–8.47 (Table 1.

Table 2 Fluoride content (mg F/L) of three different batch numbers of each bottled water, measured in duplicate

Based on the data from the NDNS10 for young people aged 4 to 18 years in the UK, the mean total daily fluoride intake, when the source of water intake is solely tap water and when it is a combination of tap and bottled water were estimated to be 0.264 and 0.164 mg L?1, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3 Daily fluoride intake (mg) from drinking water (ml) by age and gender (M = male, F = female)


The results of this study were generally consistent with the two previous studies that have analysed the fluoride content of bottled water in the UK.20,21 However, the fluoride content of those bottled waters analysed in both the study of Toumba et al.21 and the present study showed some differences. Caledonian, Evian, Highland Spring, Strathmore and Volvic waters showed mean fluoride contents of 0.13, 0.15, 0.10, 0.16 and 0.23 mg F L?1, respectively in the study by Toumba et al.21, and 0.06, 0.06, 0.05, 0.11, and 0.20 mg F L?1, respectively in the present study. In a recent analysis in Belgium,23 the mean fluoride contents of Evian, Pierval, Vittel and Volvic waters were measured as 0.08, 0.08, 0.17 and 0.15 mg F L?1, respectively. These results were close to those recorded in the present study. As the method of fluoride analysis was similar in all studies, the differences between the measured fluoride contents of bottled waters in different studies can be explained by variation of the fluoride content of water over time, depending on the sources of bottled water, as well as seasonal fluctuation.

The range of pH values obtained in the study was in the range of the normal pH found in surface water systems (6.5–8.5) or groundwater systems (6–8.5).25

This study showed that only 32% of products sampled displayed the fluoride content of the water on the labels. Health professionals should be aware that values on labels may not be reliable, as the present study showed a difference between the measured fluoride content and that marked on the labels in 75% of the bottled water samples. It is also important that the consumers have accurate information on the fluoride content of the water that they drink. With this in mind it may be advisable for bottled waters to be assayed at least twice per year for their fluoride content by an independent organisation. There is no strict regulation on the labelling of fluoride contents of bottled waters in Europe, and while products are exported from one European country to another and beyond there is potential for confusion. The need for detailed European Union-based regulation in this regard should be considered.

When the results of the present study are used to estimate daily fluoride intake from drinking water by age and gender (Table 3), it is clear that bottled water consumers receive less than the recommended level of fluoride for optimal oral health. With an average daily intake of between 197 ml and 487 ml of drinking water for 4–18-year-old children in the UK respectively,10 drinking solely bottled water with a fluoride concentration of 0.08 mg F L?1 would result in a 26% to 48% reduction in fluoride intake compared with the consumption of tap water optimally fluoridated at 1 mg L?1 (Table 3). This is a considerable reduction since 12% of the UK population receive naturally or artificially fluoridated water.26

In view of these estimated differences, it is important that the source of drinking water is identified by the dentist when giving preventive advice and especially when prescribing fluoride therapy in children. In addition, when evaluating the effect of bottled water consumption on total fluoride intake of an individual, three factors should be considered:

  1. 1The quantity of bottled water consumed per day
  2. 2Fluoride intake from other sources such as toothpaste ingestion or high fluoride foods, and
  3. 3Usage of bottled water in meal preparation, baby formula and infant food dilution.


  1. Fomon SJ, Ekstrand J, Ekhard E, Ziegler EE . Fluoride intake and prevalence of dental fluorosis: trends in fluoride intake with special attention to infants. J Pub Health Dent 2000; 60: 131– 139.

    Article  Google Scholar

  2. Murray JJ, Rugg-Gunn AJ, Jenkins GN . Fluorides in caries prevention. 3rd edn. Bristol: Wright, 1991.

    Google Scholar

  3. Murray JJ . Adult dental health in fluoride and nonfluoride areas. Br Dent J 1971; 131: 391– 395.

    Article  Google Scholar

  4. Galagan DJ, Vermillion JR, Nevitt GA, Stadt ZM, Dart RE . Climate and fluid intake. Public Health Rep 1957; 72: 484– 490.

    Article  Google Scholar

  5. McPhail CWB, Zacherl W . Fluid intake and climatic temperature; relation to fluoridation. J Can Dent Assoc 1965; 31: 7– 16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar

  6. Hopkin SM, Ellis JC . Drinking water consumption in Great Britain; a survey of drinking habits with special reference to tap-water-based beverages. Technical report TR 137. Marlow: Water Research Centre, June 1980.

    Google Scholar

  7. Rugg-Gunn AJ, Hackett AF, Appleton DR, Eastoe JE, Dowthwaite L, Wright WG . The water intake of 405 Northumbrian adolescents aged 12-14 years. Br Dent J 1987; 162: 335– 340.

    Article  Google Scholar

  8. Ershaw AG, Cantor KP . Total water and tap water intake in the United States: Population-based estimates of quantities and sources. National Cancer Institute, 1989, publication no. 263-MD-810264.

    Google Scholar

  9. Weinberger SJ . Bottled drinking waters: are the fluoride concentrations shown on the labels accurate? Int J Paediatr Dent 1991; 1: 143– 146.

    Article  Google Scholar

  10. Gregory JR, Lowe S . National diet and nutrition survey: young people aged 4 to 18 years. Volume 1: Report of the diet and nutrition survey. London: The Stationary Office, 2000.

    Google Scholar

  11. McGuire S . Fluoride content of bottled water. New Eng J Med 1989; 321: 836– 837.

    PubMed  Google Scholar

  12. Bedford AM . Beverages and Health. Available at: http://www.nutrition.org.uk/conferences/keyfacts/beverages.htm [Accessed 7 October 2003].

    Google Scholar

  13. Tate and Lyle Speciality Sweeteners. Sucralose soft drinks report. Reading UK, 2001.

  14. Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Beverages: Bottled Water. 21 CFR Parts 103, 129, 165, and 184.

  15. Flaitz CM, Hill EM, Hicks MJA . A survey of bottled water usage by pediatric dental patients: implications for dental health. Quintessence Int 1989; 20: 847– 852.

    PubMed  Google Scholar

  16. Stannard J, Rovero J, Tsamtsouris A, Gavris V . Fluoride content of some bottled waters and recommendations for fluoride supplementation. J Ped. 1990; 14: 103– 107.

    Google Scholar

  17. Chan JT, Stark C, Jeske AH . Fluoride content of bottled waters: implications for dietary fluoride supplementation. Tex Dent J 1990; 107: 17– 21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar

  18. Chan JT, Liu CF, Tate WH . Fluoride concentration in milk, tea and bottled water in Houston. J Greater Houston Dent Soc 1994; 66: 8– 9.

    Google Scholar

  19. Bartles D, Haney K, Khajotia SS . Fluoride concentrations in bottled water. J Oklahoma Dent Assoc 2000; 91: 18– 22.

    Google Scholar

  20. MacFadyen EE, McNee SG, Weetman DA . Fluoride content of some bottled spring waters. Br Dent J 1982; 153: 423– 424.

    Article  Google Scholar

  21. Toumba KJ, Levy S, Curzon MEJ . The fluoride content of bottled drinking waters. Br Dent J 1994; 176: 266– 8.

    Article  Google Scholar

  22. Schulte A, Schiefer M, Stoll R, Pieper K . Fluridkonzentration in deutschen Mineralwassern (in German). Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1996; 51: 763– 767.

    Google Scholar

  23. Bottenberg P . Personal communication, 2002.

  24. Zohouri FV, Rugg-Gunn AJ . Fluoride concentration in foods from Iran. Inter J Food Sci Nutr 1999; 50: 262– 274.

    Google Scholar

  25. Centre for Environmental Quality Geo Environmental Science and Engineering Department. pH of water. Wilkes University, 2002.

  26. Medical Research Council. MRC Working Group report on: Water fluoridation and Health. London: MRC, 2002.

Download references

Author information


Corresponding author

Correspondence to F V Zohouri.

Additional information

Refereed paper

About this article

Cite this article

Zohouri, F., Maguire, A. & Moynihan, P. Fluoride content of still bottled waters available in the North–East of England, UK. Br Dent J 195, 515–518 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4810668

Download citation

Further reading

*Original abstract online at https://www.nature.com/articles/4810668