NTP: Government-funded Fluoride Studies
It’s important to stress that from 1950, when the U.S. government approved the deliberate addition of fluoride into the drinking water of millions, no government agency has ever performed an assessment of the risks of this practice for the most vulnerable in our society,
- the pregnant woman living in a fluoridated community
- the fetus of a woman living in a fluoridated community
- the bottle-fed infant living in a fluoridated community
Yet the public is still told that community water fluoridation is “safe.”
Under the leadership of Dr. Linda Birnbaum, the director of the NIEHS and NTP from 2009 to 2019, the following government agencies have began to fund fluoride studies.
- NIEHS (National Institutes of Environmental Health Studies) has responsibility for the NTP
- NIH (National Institutes of Health) has responsibility for the NIEHS
- EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) has responsibility for ensuring “safe” fluoride levels in drinking water
The human studies, published since 2017, reveal that in fluoridated communities the fetus and the formula-fed infant are the most vulnerable to fluoride’s neurotoxicity. Certain high levels of fluoride in the pregnant women’s urine were found to significantly impact the IQ, or neurodevelopment, of the offspring. These high urinary fluoride levels are found in pregnant women living in fluoridated areas as well as in naturally-occurring high fluoride areas.
|NIEHS||2021||Grandjean et al., A Benchmark Dose Analysis for Maternal Pregnancy Urine-Fluoride and IQ in Children.||The analysis found that a maternal urine fluoride concentration of 0.2 mg/L was enough to lower IQ by 1 point. This level is exceeded 4 to 5 times in pregnant women living in fluoridated communities.|
|NIEHS||2021||Farmus et al., Critical Windows of Fluoride Neurotoxicity in Canadian Children||
• The strongest association between fluoride and Performance IQ was during the prenatal window; the association was also significant during infancy.
• Within sex, the association between fluoride and PIQ significantly differed across the three exposure windows; among boys, the strongest association was during the prenatal window, whereas among girls, the strongest association was during infancy.
• The susceptibility of infants to fluoride from drinking water is further amplified by their higher level of water intake than adults on a per body-weight basis (Snodgrass, 1992) and lower ability to detoxify exogenous compounds than adults. In particular, formula-fed infants, whose formula is made with fluoridated water, have an approximate 70-fold higher fluoride intake than exclusively breastfed infants (Ekstrand, 1981; Zohoori et al., 2018; US EPA, 2010). Thus, level and timing of fluoride exposure are critical for determining the window of greatest vulnerability for neurodevelopmental outcomes.
|NIEHS, EPA||2021||Castiblanco-Rubio et al., Dietary Influences on Urinary Fluoride over the Course of Pregnancy and at One-Year Postpartum.||No significant observations made in this study.|
|NIEHS||2021||Ayele et al., Neuro-medical manifestations of fluorosis in populations living in the Main Ethiopian Rift Valley.||Headache and joint pain reported by 67.1% and 56.3% of the participants as the most common neurological manifestation.|
|NIH||2021||Kyzer et al., Metabolism and Toxicity of Fluorine Compounds.||The use of fluorine in pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals has expanded dramatically since its first use in the 1950s. Its use is often tied to improved metabolic stability, selectivity, and solubility, which has been demonstrated for a variety of products. However, fluorinated compounds are not immune to metabolism and liberation of fluoride or low molecular weight fluorinated molecules from fluorine-containing drugs, and candidates must be monitored to avoid potentially lethal toxicity.|
|NIEHS||2021||Cunningham et al., Fluoride exposure and duration and quality of sleep in a Canadian population-based sample.|
|NIH, EPA||2021||Signes-Pastor et al., Exposure to a Mixture of Metals and Growth Indicators in 6–11-Year-Old Children from the 2013–2016 NHANES.|
|NIEHS||2020||Till et al., Fluoride exposure from infant formula and child IQ in a Canadian birth cohort.||
|NIH, EPA||2020||Uyghurturk et al., Maternal and fetal exposures to fluoride during mid-gestation among pregnant women in northern California.||The first U.S. study of urinary fluoride levels in pregnant women as well as fluoride levels in serum and the amniotic fluid of pregnant women.|
|NIEHS||2020||Farmus et al., Critical Windows of Fluoride Neurotoxicity in Canadian Children.||Within sex, the association between fluoride and performance IQ significantly differed across the three exposure windows (p = .01); among boys, the strongest association was during the prenatal window, whereas among girls, the strongest association was during infancy.|
|NIEHS||2020||Green et al., Sex-Specific Neurotoxic Effects of Early-Life Exposure to Fluoride: a Review of the Epidemiologic and Animal Literature.||Compared with females, male offspring appear to be more sensitive to prenatal, but not postnatal, exposure to fluoride. We discuss several sex-specific mechanisms and emphasize the need for future research.|
|NIEHS, NIH||2020||Green et al., Associations between Urinary, Dietary, and Water Fluoride Concentrations among Children in Mexico and Canada.||We found that childhood urinary fluoride levels are comparable among children in Mexico City and fluoridated Canadian communities, despite distinct sources of exposure. Community water fluoridation is a major source of fluoride exposure for Canadian children.|
|NIEHS, NIH||2020||Godebo et al., Bone quality in fluoride-exposed populations: A novel application of the ultrasonic method.|
|NIEHS||2019||Green et al., Association Between Maternal Fluoride Exposure During Pregnancy and IQ Scores in Offspring in Canada.||
|NIEHS||2019||Grandjean, Developmental fluoride neurotoxicity: an updated review.||Conclusion: The recent epidemiological results support the notion that elevated fluoride intake during early development can result in IQ deficits that may be considerable. Recognition of neurotoxic risks is necessary when determining the safety of fluoride-contaminated drinking water and fluoride uses for preventive dentistry purposes.|
|NIEHS, NIH||2018||Bashash et al., Prenatal fluoride exposure and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in children at 6–12 years of age in Mexico City.||
Higher concentration of maternal urinary fluoride was associated with more ADHD-like symptoms in school-age children.
Prenatal exposure to fluoride was most strongly associated with behavioral ratings of inattention
|NIEHS, NIH||2018||Till et al., Community Water Fluoridation and Urinary Fluoride Concentrations in a National Sample of Pregnant Women in Canada.||The first national survey in Canada of urinary fluoride levels in pregnant women.|
|NIEHS, NIH, EPA||2017||Bashash et al., 2017, Prenatal Fluoride Exposure and Cognitive Outcomes in Children at 4 and 6–12 Years of Age in Mexico||
|NTP, NIEHS, NIH, HHS||2018||McPherson et al., An Evaluation of Neurotoxicity Following Fluoride Exposure from Gestational Through Adult Ages in Long-Evans Hooded Rats.||
This study was hailed by fluoridation proponents who said that no adverse neurotoxic effects were found in this study.
Spencer & Limeback identified flaws in the study.
Another flaw in this study that hasn’t been mentioned is that the rats were dosed with fluoride in drinking water from gestational day 6. The average gestation time for black hooded Long Evans rats is 20 to 23 days (Janvier Labs). The average gestation time for other rats, not identified as to species, is 21 to 23 days (Merck). (EC)
|NTP||1990||Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Sodium Fluoride in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Drinking Water Studies).||In the current study, although the pairwise comparison of the incidence in the175 ppm group versus that in the controls was not statistically significant, osteosarcomas occurred with a statistically significant dose-response trend, leading to the conclusion that a weak association may exist between the occurrence of these neoplasms and the administration of sodium fluoride.|
The Sprando & Collins Animal Studies
EPA invested a lot of credence in the Sprando and Collins rat studies. Their studies found negligible effects of sodium fluoride on developmental toxicity and male reproduction at levels up to 250 ppm NaF. One of the findings that raises serious questions about these studies is the notably low incidence and severity of dental fluorosis in their treated animals. Even in the highest dosed animals (250 ppm NaF) the only dental fluorosis that was observed, according to the authors, was mild in nature. This is in stark contrast to most other studies which typically find severe changes to tooth enamel at concentrations < 100 ppm. (Den Besten et al. 1984,1985; NTP 1990). In the 1990 NTP cancer study, for instance, at 79 ppm, animals exhibited severe fluorosis of the enamel. Thus, the abnormally mild nature of the fluorosis observed in the Sprando and Collins studies suggests that the level of bio-available fluoride in these studies may be less than the authors assumed.
In contrast to the findings of over 150 animal studies from other research teams, the Sprando & Collins team reported virtually no evidence of reproductive toxicity among animals treated with very high levels of fluoride exposure. The reasons for this discrepancy remains unclear.
Comments on the Sprando & Collins studies
• submitted to the National Research Council in 2004
• submitted to the EPA in 2005
|FDA||2001||Colins, Sprando, et al. Multigenerational evaluation of sodium fluoride in rats.|
|FDA||2001||Collins, Sprando, et al., Developmental toxicity of sodium fluoride measured during multiple generations.|
|FDA||1998||Sprando, Collins, et al. Testing the potential of sodium fluoride to affect spermatogenesis: a morphometric study.|
|FDA||1997||Sprando, Collins, et al. Testing the potential of sodium fluoride to affect spermatogenesis in the rat.|
|FDA||1996||Sprando, et al. Effect of intratesticular injection of sodium fluoride on spermatogenesis.|
|FDA||1995||Collins, Sprando, et al. Developmental toxicity of sodium fluoride in rats.|