Background: Fluoride is associated with IQ deficits during early brain development, but the period in which children are most vulnerable has not been established. We assessed sex-specific effects of fluoride on IQ across prenatal, infancy, and early childhood windows.
Methods: Repeated exposures from 596 mother-child pairs in the Maternal-Infant Research on Environmental Chemicals cohort were analyzed using GEE to explore associations between fluoride exposures and IQ after adjustment for covariates and multiple comparisons. Fluoride was measured in urine spot samples collected during pregnancy trimesters and when children were between 1.9 and 4.4 years. Infant fluoride exposure was estimated from water fluoride concentration and duration of formula-feeding over the first year of life. The Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-III was administered at 3 to 4 years.
Results: Among boys and girls, the association between fluoride and performance IQ (PIQ) significantly differed across exposure windows (p = .01). Among boys, prenatal exposure to fluoride was most strongly associated with adverse deficits on PIQ, B = -8.45 (95% CI: -12.90, -3.99), followed by infancy, B = -2.81 (95% CI: -6.59, 0.98), but not childhood, B = 0.20 (95% CI: -2.58, 2.99), respectively. Among girls, infancy exposure to fluoride was most strongly associated with adverse deficits on PIQ, B= -5.19 (95% CI: -8.84, -1.53), followed by prenatal and childhood exposures, B = -3.50 (95% CI: -9.51, 2.51), B = -2.05 (95% CI: -2.58, 2.99), respectively. Estimates for full-scale IQ were weaker but showed strongest effects for boys in the prenatal exposure period. Effects across all windows were nonsignificant among girls. We found no significant sex-specific associations between fluoride and verbal IQ.
Conclusion: Adverse associations between fluoride exposures and cognitive outcomes may depend on timing and biological sex, with the prenatal window potentially critical for boys, while infancy is potentially critical for girls.
This abstract was presented in SYMPOSIUM 20 at the virtual 32nd Conference of ISEE.
L. Farmus, York University, -Toronto, ON, CANADA
R. Green, York University, -Toronto, ON, CANADA
C. Till, York University, -Toronto, ON, CANADA
R. Hornung, University of Cincinnati, Cincinatti, OH
E. Martinez Mier, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN
B. Lanphear, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, CANADA
D. Flora, York University, -Toronto, ON, CANADA
Related Studies :
The importance of timing in fluoride-induced developmental neurotoxicity.
Exposure to the fluoride ion can, in sufficient dose, induce neurotoxicity at any age, in both adults and children, but for fluoride-induced neurotoxicity to occur, in response to exposure to low doses of fluoride in the developing brain, the timing of the exposure is of importance. The evidence to date
Systematic Review of Fluoride Exposure and Neurodevelopmental and Cognitive Health Effects.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: People of all ages are exposed to fluoride from a variety of sources including dental products, drinking water, food, beverages and pharmaceuticals. In some developed countries, fluoride is added to municipal water systems to prevent tooth decay. The National Toxicology Program (NTP) conducted a systematic review of
Fluoride Exposure and Concurrent Cognitive Outcomes in 7-15 Year Old Children from Mexico City, Mexico.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported an inverse association between fluoride exposure and IQ in children, but most were ecological in design. Few involved personal measures of exposure or adjusted for confounders.
METHODS: This study utilized archived urine samples and data from offspring who participated in the Early Life Exposures in Mexico
Early Life Exposure in Mexico to Environmental Toxicants (ELEMENT) Project.
PURPOSE: The Early Life Exposure in Mexico to ENvironmental Toxicants (ELEMENT) Project is a mother-child pregnancy and birth cohort originally initiated in the mid-1990s to explore: (1) whether enhanced mobilisation of lead from maternal bone stores during pregnancy poses a risk to fetal and subsequent offspring neurodevelopment; and (2) whether
Prenatal Fluoride Exposure and Cognitive Outcomes in Children at 4 and 6–12 Years of Age in Mexico
Background: Some evidence suggests that fluoride may be neurotoxic to children. Few of the epidemiologic studies have been longitudinal, had individual measures of fluoride exposure, addressed the impact of prenatal exposures or involved more than 100 participants.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to estimate the association of prenatal exposure to fluoride with
Related FAN Content :
Nutrient Deficiencies Enhance Fluoride Toxicity
It has been known since the 1930s that poor nutrition enhances the toxicity of fluoride. As discussed below, nutrient deficiencies have been specifically linked to increased susceptibility to fluoride-induced tooth damage (dental fluorosis), bone damage (osteomalacia), neurotoxicity (reduced intelligence), and mutagenicity. The nutrients of primary importance appear to be calcium,
Unheeded Warnings: Government Health Authorities Ignore Fluoride Risk for Kidney Patients
Despite the well known fact that individuals with kidney disease are at much higher risk of fluoride toxicity than the general population, there has yet to be any attempt in the United States, or any other country that practices mass-scale water fluoridation to determine the prevalence of fluoride-related effects (e.g.,
Fluoride's Direct Effects on Brain: Animal Studies
The possibility that fluoride ingestion may impair intelligence and other indices of neurological function is supported by a vast body of animal research, including over 40 studies that have investigated fluoride's effects on brain quality in animals. As discussed by the National Research Council, the studies have consistently demonstrated that fluoride, at widely varying concentrations, is toxic to the brain.
NRC (2006): Fluoride's Neurotoxicity and Neurobehavioral Effects
The NRC's analysis on fluoride and the brain.
Skeletal Fluorosis & Individual Variability
One of the common fallacies in the research on skeletal fluorosis is the notion that there is a uniform level of fluoride that is safe for everyone in the population. These "safety thresholds" have been expressed in terms of (a) bone fluoride content, (b) daily dose, (c) water fluoride level, (d) urinary fluoride level, and (e) blood fluoride level. The central fallacy with each of these alleged safety thresholds, however, is that they ignore the wide range of individual susceptibility in how people respond to toxic substances, including fluoride.