Abstract
Objectives
Topical fluoride helps prevent dental caries. However, many caregivers are hesitant about topical fluoride for their children and may refuse it during clinic visits. In this qualitative study, we assessed the relevance of the extended parallel process model (EPPM) and health belief model (HBM) in caregivers’ decision-making about topical fluoride.
Methods
We interviewed 56 fluoride-hesitant or fluoride-refusing caregivers using a semi-structured interview script that included questions based on select constructs from the EPPM (perceived severity, susceptibility, response efficacy) and HBM (perceived benefits and consequences). Two team members conducted a thematic analysis of the interview data.
Results
Most caregivers acknowledged the severity of cavities but did not believe their child was susceptible. Caregivers also understood the general benefits of fluoride in preventing tooth decay, but reported low response efficacy of fluoride for their children especially compared to the other ways of reducing caries risk like reducing sugar intake and toothbrushing. Many caregivers had concerns about topical fluoride, especially regarding safety, with the potential consequences of fluoride outweighing its benefits.
Conclusion
Our findings were generally consistent with the EPPM and HBM, which appear to be relevant in understanding fluoride hesitancy behaviors. Additional research is needed on ways to improve provider communications about topical fluoride with caregivers.
Funding information:
U.S. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), Grant/Award Number: R01DE026741
*Original abstract online at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35288941/
Excerpt:
References:
1. Weyant RJ, Tracy SL, Anselmo TT, Beltrán-Aguilar ED, Donly KJ, Frese WA, et al. Topical fluoride for caries prevention: executive summary of the updated clinical recommendations and supporting systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013;144(11):1279-91.
2. Marinho VCC, Worthington HV, Walsh T, Clarkson JE. Fluoride varnishes for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(7):CD002279.
3. Chi DL. Parent refusal of topical fluoride for their children. Dent Clin N Am. 2017;61(3):607-17.
4. Chi DL. Caregivers who refuse preventive care for their children: the relationship between immunization and topical fluoride refusal. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(7):1327-33.
5. Chi DL, Basson AA. Surveying dentists’ perceptions of caregiver refusal of topical fluoride. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2018;3(3):314-20.
6. Witte K. Putting the fear back into fear appeals: the extended parallel process model. Commun Monogr. 1992;59(4):329-49.
7. Becker MH. The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2:324-508.
8. Askelson NM, Chi DL, Momany E, Kuthy R, Ortiz C, Hanson JD, et al. Encouraging early preventive dental visits for preschool-aged children enrolled in Medicaid: using the extended parallel process model to conduct formative research: early preventive dental visits. J Public Health Dent. 2014 Winter;74(1):64-70.
9. Deshpande S, Basil MD, Basil DZ. Factors influencing healthy eating habits among college students: an application of the health belief model. Health Mark Q. 2009;26(2):145-64.
10. O’Connor PJ, Martin B, Weeks CS, Ong L. Factors that influence young people’s mental health help-seeking behaviour: a study based on the health belief model. J Adv Nurs. 2014;70(11):2577-87.
11. Opel DJ, Taylor JA, Zhou C, Catz S, Myaing M, Mangione-Smith R. The relationship between parent attitudes about childhood vaccines survey scores and future child immunization status: a validation study. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(11):1065-71.
12. Crabtree B, Miller W. A template approach to text analysis: developing and using codebooks. In: Crabtree B, Miller W, editors. Doing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1999. p. 163-77.
13. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
14. Brega AG, Johnson RL, Schmiege SJ, Wilson AR, Jiang L, Albino J. Pathways through which health literacy is linked to parental Oral health behavior in an American Indian tribe. Ann Behav Med. 2021;55(11):1144-1155. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaab006
15. Divaris K. Predicting dental caries outcomes in children: a “risky” concept. J Dent Res. 2016;95(3):248-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515620779
16. Yokoyama Y, Kakudate N, Sumida F, Matsumoto Y, Gilbert GH, Gordan VV. Evidence-practice gap for in-office fluoride application in a dental practice-based research network. J Public Health Dent. 2016;76(2):91-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jphd.12114
17. Walsh T, Worthington HV, Glenny AM, Marinho VC, Jeroncic A. Fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations for preventing dental caries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;3(3):CD007868. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007868.pub3
18. Reich JA. Neoliberal mothering and vaccine refusal: imagined gated communities and the privilege of choice. Gend Soc. 2014;28(5):679-704. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243214532711
19. Wade KJ, Coates DE, Gauld RD, Livingstone V, Cullinan MP. Oral hygiene behaviours and readiness to change using the TransTheoretical model (TTM). N Z Dent J. 2013;109(2):64-8.
20. Coiro J, Knobel M, Lankshear C, Leu DJ, editors. Handbook of Research on New Literacies. London, UK: Routledge; 2014.
21. Campbell BK. Fidelity in public health clinical trials: considering provider-participant relationship factors in community treatment settings. J Public Health Dent. 2011;71(1):S64-5.
Print 
PDF