Abstract

The impact of fluorine on plants remains poorly understood. We examined duckweed growth in extracts of soil contaminated with fluorine leached from chicken manure. Additionally, fluorine levels were analyzed in fresh manure, outdoor-stored manure, and soil samples at varying distances from the manure pile. Fresh manure contained 37–48 mg F × kg-1, while soil extracts contained 2.1 to 4.9 mg F × kg-1. We evaluated the physiological effects of fluorine on duckweed cultured on soil extracts or in 50% Murashige–Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with fluorine concentrations matching those in soil samples (2.1 to 4.9 mg F × L-1), as well as at 0, 4, and 210 mg × L-1. Duckweed exposed to fluorine displayed similar toxicity symptoms whether in soil extracts or supplemented medium. Fluoride at concentrations of 2.1 to 4.9 mg F × L-1 reduced the intact chlorophyll content, binding the porphyrin ring at position 32 without affecting Mg2+. This reaction resulted in chlorophyll a absorption peak shifted towards shorter wavelengths and formation of a new band of the Fchlorophyll a complex at ? = 421 nm. Moreover, plants exposed to low concentrations of fluorine exhibited increased activities of aminolevulinic acid dehydratase and chlorophyllase, whereas the activities of both enzymes sharply declined when the fluoride concentration exceeded 4.9 mg × L-1. Consequently, fluorine damages chlorophyll a, disrupts the activity of chlorophyll-metabolizing enzymes, and diminishes the plant growth rate, even when the effects of these disruptions are too subtle to be discerned by the naked human eye.
Graphical Abstract

Original article online at https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/29/10/2336

Excerpts:

… The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of extracts of soil contaminated with manure from intensive poultry farming (and consequently contaminated with fluoride) on plant physiological state. Duckweed (Lemna minor L.) was used as a bioindicator plant and the following parameters were analyzed: fluoride and chlorophyll a content, rate of plant growth, activities of chlorophyllase, and aminolevulinic acid dehydratase. In addition, we studied the molecular mechanism of fluoride’s effect on chlorophyll in plants. To the best of our knowledge, the detailed mechanism of fluoride-induced chlorophyll decay in plants has not been fully understood to date.

4. Conclusions

  • Manure resulting as a by-product of poultry production contains phytotoxic levels of fluorine.
  • Extracts of such contaminated soil clearly affect the growth rate rather than morphology of Lemna minor as an indicator plant.
  • Chlorophyll a turns out to be the target of phytotoxic action of fluorine on Lemna plants.
  • This paper postulates the molecular mechanism of chlorophyll damage induced by fluorine, which is fluorine entering the porphyrin ring at position 32, and leaving magnesium ion at its central position.
  • Aquatic plants can serve as indicators of environmental pollution with fluoride, but visual assessment of their condition is not sufficient for this purpose. It is necessary to use at least simple instrumental analyses to reveal chlorophyll damage or changes in the activity of enzymes associated with its biosynthesis and catabolism. It is necessary to use at least simple instrumental analyses to reveal chlorophyll damage or changes in the activity of enzymes associated with its biosynthesis and catabolism.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29102336/s1, Table S1: The content of fluoride ions and physicochemical properties of soil—A, macroelements—B and other metals—C, D; Figure S1: Absorption spectra of chlorophyll isolated from duckweed A—growing on soil extracts and—B in conditions simulating soil extracts (50% MS + F? medium).