Research Studies
Study Tracker
Fluoride Exposure and the Effect of Tobacco Smoking on Urinary Fluoride Levels in Primary Aluminum Workers.
| Applied Sciences | Schwarz M, Salva J, Vanek M, Rasulov O, Darmova I. | 11(1):156.
aluminum industry Tissue F Levels Total Body Burden Urine-F Human Study Occupational
View PDF
References International Aluminium Institute. Available online: http://www.world-aluminium.org/statistics/ (accessed on 1 September 2020). Berdowski, J.; van der Most, P.; Mulder, W.; Bloos, J.P.; Payna, J.M.; Rentz, O.; Oertel, D.; Woodfield, M.; Pulles, T.; Appelman, W. Aluminium production. In 2016 EMEP/EEA Emission Inventory Guidebook; European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2016. [Google Scholar] Kvande, H. The aluminium smelting process. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2014,

Abstract

Workers in primary aluminum smelter are exposed to fluoride from cryolite (Na3AlF6) used in the electrolysis process. Post-shift urinary fluoride is considered as an appropriate index for examination of fluoride exposure. The objective of the study was to investigate the exposure to fluoride in primary aluminum smelter in Žiar nad Hronom (Slovakia) during three consecutive two-year periods between 2012 and 2018. The relationship between fluoride exposure in the occupational environment, tobacco smoking, and pre- and post-shift urinary fluoride concentration was investigated in 76 male workers in the ages from 21 to 60 years. Workers were monitored by personal fluoride sampling equipment. Their urinary samples were collected prior to the start and at the end of an eight-hour shift. Fluoride content in urine samples was analyzed by potentiometric ion-selective electrode and expressed as weight ratio of fluoride content to creatinine. The Mean ± SD particulate fluoride concentration in occupational air was 0.966 ± 1.658 mg/m3 and gas-phase fluoride concentration was 0.327 ± 0.809 mg/m3. Mean urinary fluoride concentration of all workers was significantly higher (p < 0.001) after the eight-hour shift. Smokers tended to have a higher post-shift mean urinary fluoride concentration than non-smokers, but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.11). The difference between these two groups of workers was also not statistically significant (p = 0.62) before the shift. Therefore, according to results, smoking caused no statistically significant difference in urinary fluoride levels between the group of smokers and group of non-smokers in primary aluminum workers.

Figure 1

*Full text study online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/1/156/htm

References

  1. International Aluminium Institute. Available online: http://www.world-aluminium.org/statistics/ (accessed on 1 September 2020).
  2. Berdowski, J.; van der Most, P.; Mulder, W.; Bloos, J.P.; Payna, J.M.; Rentz, O.; Oertel, D.; Woodfield, M.; Pulles, T.; Appelman, W. Aluminium production. In 2016 EMEP/EEA Emission Inventory Guidebook; European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kvande, H. The aluminium smelting process. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2014, 56 (Suppl. S5), S2–S4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. European Chemicals Agency. Available online: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/c53c81ed-9e4e-4cb7-9930-f22ca736708c (accessed on 9 April 2020).
  5. Ranjan, R.; Ranjan, A. Fluoride Toxicity in Animals, 1st ed.; Springer International Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 11–20. [Google Scholar]
  6. Susheela, A.K.; Mondai, N.K.; Singh, A. Exposure to fluoride in smelter workers in a primary aluminium industry in India. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2013, 4, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Villa, A.; Anabalon, M.; Zohouri, V.; Maguire, A.; Franco, A.M.; Rugg-Gunn, A. Relationships between fluoride intake, urinary fluoride excretion and fluoride retention in children and adults: An analysis of available data. Caries Res. 2010, 44, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Toxicological Profile for Fluorides, Hydrogen Fluoride, and Fluorine; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2003.
  9. Seixas, N.S.; Cohen, M.; Zevenbergen, B.; Cotey, M.; Carter, S.; Kaufam, J. Urinary fluoride as an exposure index in aluminium smelting. J. Sci. Occup. Environ. Health Saf. 2010, 61, 89–94. [Google Scholar]
  10. Aylward, L.L.; Hays, S.M.; Vezina, A.; Deveau, M.; St-Amand, A.; Nong, A. Biomonitoring Equivalents for interpretation of urinary fluoride. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2015, 72, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Idowu, O.S.; Azevedo, L.B.; Valentine, R.A.; Swan, J.; Vasantavada, P.V.; Maguire, A. The use of urinary fluoride excretion to facilitate monitoring fluoride intake: A systematic scoping review. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0222260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Schwarz, M. Monitoring of fluorine in foodstuffs within the district of Žiar nad Hronom in 1986–1997. Food Res. Inst. Bratisl. 1998, 37, 53–64. [Google Scholar]
  13. Koç, E.; Karademir, B.; Soomro, N.; Uzun, F. The Effects, both separate and interactive, of smoking and tea consumption on urinary fluoride levels. Fluoride 2018, 51, 84–96. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kocyigit, A.; Erel, O.; Gur, S. Effects of tobacco smoking on plasma selenium, zinc, copper and iron concentrations and related antioxidative enzyme activities. Clin. Biochem. 2001, 34, 629–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Özden, T.A.; Gökçay, G.; Ertem, H.V.; Süo?lu, Ö.D.; K?l?ç, A.; Sökücü, S. Elevated hair levels of cadmium and lead in school children exposed to smoking and in highways near schools. Clin. Biochem. 2007, 40, 52–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Slov-Lex Legislative and Information Portal. Ordinance No. 355/2006 on Protection of Employees against Risks due to Exposure to Chemical Factors at Work. Available online: https://www.slov-lex.sk/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2006/355/20201001 (accessed on 26 December 2020).
  17. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Fluorides, aerosol and gas by ISE. In 1994 Method: 7902, Issue 2, 4th ed.; NIOSH: Washington, DC, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  18. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Fluoride in Urine. In 1994 Method: 8308, Issue 2; NIOSH: Washington, DC, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  19. Barr, D.B.; Wilder, L.C.; Caudill, S.P.; Gonzalez, A.J.; Needham, L.L.; Pirkle, J.L. Urinary creatinine concentrations in the U.S. population: Implications for urinary biologic monitoring measurements. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Occupational Exposure to Inorganic Fluorides; NIOSH: Washington, DC, USA, 1976; Publication No. 76103. [Google Scholar]
  21. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Occupational Exposure to Hydrogen Fluoride; NIOSH: Washington, DC, USA, 1976; Publication No. 76143. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ehrnebo, M.; Ekstrand, J. Occupational fluoride exposure and plasma fluoride levels in man. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 1986, 58, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Aarhaug, T.A.; Ratvik, A.P. Aluminium Primary Production Off-Gas Composition and Emissions: An Overview. JOM 2019, 71, 2966–2977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Available online: https://www.osha.gov/annotated-pels/table-z-1 (accessed on 9 December 2020).
  25. European Commission Website. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/opinions_layman/fluoridation/en/l-3/4.htm (accessed on 10 December 2020).
  26. Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute. Available online: http://www.shmu.sk/File/oko/rocenky/SHMU_Air_Pollution_in_the_SR_2019_v1.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2020).
  27. Pierre, F.; Baruthio, F.; Diebold, F.; Biette, P. Effect of different exposure compounds on urinary kinetics of aluminium and fluoride in industrially exposed workers. Occup. Environ. Med. 1995, 52, 396–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kono, K.; Yoshida, Y.; Yamagata, H.; Watanabe, M.; Shibuya, Y.; Doi, K. Urinary fluoride monitoring of industrial hydrofluoric acid exposure. Environ. Res. 1987, 42, 415–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Waugh, D.T.; Godfrey, M.; Limeback, H.; Potter, W. Black Tea Source, Production, and Consumption: Assessment of Health Risks of Fluoride Intake in New Zealand. J. Environ. Public Health 2017, 2017, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Whitford, G.M. The Metabolism and Toxicity of Fluoride. Monogr. Oral Sci. 1996, 16, 1–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. World Health Organization. Basic Methods for Assessing Renal Fluoride Excretion in Community Prevention Programmes for Oral Health; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014; Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/112662 (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  32. Rees, D.; Rama, D.B.; Yousefi, V. Fluoride in workplace air and in urine of workers concentrating fluorspar. Am. J. Ind. Med. 1990, 17, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zohouri, F.V.; Swinbank, C.M.; Maguire, A.; Moynihan, P.J. Is the fluoride/creatinine ratio of a spot urine sample indicative of 24-h urinary fluoride? Community Dent. Oral. Epidemiol. 2006, 34, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003-154/pdfs/8308.pdf (accessed on 8 December 2020).
  35. Lauwerys, R.R.; Hoet, P. Industrial Chemical Exposure Guidelines for Biological Monitoring, 3rd ed.; CRC Press, Inc.: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2001; pp. 97–102. [Google Scholar]
  36. National Research Council. Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Scientific Review of EPA’s Standards, 1st ed.; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Laisalmi, M.; Soikkeli, A.; Kokki, H.; Markkanen, H.; Yli-Hankala, A.; Rosenberg, P.; Lindgren, L. Fluoride metabolism in smokers and non-smokers following enflurane anaesthesia. Br. J. Anaesth. 2003, 91, 800–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Radon, K.; Nowak, D.; Szadkowski, D. Lack of Combined Effects of Exposure and Smoking on Respiratory Health in Aluminium Potroom Workers. Occup. Environ. Med. 1999, 56, 468–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Tu, J.; Liu, K.; Ran, L.; Pan, X. Fluoride burden of aluminium plant workers. Iran. J. Public Health 2015, 44, 583–585. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]