Abstract

BACKGROUND

Effective quarantine fumigation of raw logs remains a critical phytosanitary measure under international regulations such as ISPM 39. Methyl bromide (MB) and sulfuryl fluoride (SF) are widely used fumigants, yet their comparative behavior in high-moisture, tightly structured coniferous logs is poorly characterized. This study evaluated the sorption, penetration, and desorption dynamics of MB and SF in Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica logs to inform fumigant selection and optimize treatment protocols.

RESULTS

Methyl bromide exhibited higher sorptive affinity than SF, as reflected by sustained declines in C/C0 values over a 48 h exposure period. Concentration gradients showed MB was retained primarily in bark and phloem, with limited penetration beyond 2 cm. SF diffused more uniformly across depths up to 6 cm but remained at lower concentrations. Desorption patterns differed significantly. MB was rapidly released, particularly from surface tissues, whereas SF desorbed slowly with negligible release from xylem. Exponential model fitting revealed higher initial desorption rates and steeper decay for MB.

CONCLUSION

The two fumigants displayed distinct sorption–desorption–penetration profiles in P. sylvestris var. mongolica. MB demonstrated superior surface affinity and rapid desorption, making it suitable for targeting pests near the bark–cambium interface. SF achieved deeper diffusion but lower tissue concentrations, suggesting limited efficacy for short-duration treatments. These results highlight the importance of matching fumigant characteristics to pest location and substrate structure and provide a mechanistic basis for refining wood fumigation protocols in line with international phytosanitary standards. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

REFERENCES
  • 1.  International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC), ISPM 15: Regulation of Wood Packaging Material in International Trade. FAO, Rome (2019).
  • 2. International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC), ISPM 39: International Movement of Wood. FAO, Rome (2017).
  • 3. Protocol, M, Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, Vol. 26. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp. 128136 (1987).
  • 4. Ren Y, Lee BH and Padovan B, Penetration of methyl bromide, sulfuryl fluoride, ethanedinitrile and phosphine into timber blocks and the sorption rate of the fumigants. J Stored Prod Res 47: 6368 (2011).
  • 5. Tsai W, Environmental and health risks of sulfuryl fluoride, a fumigant replacement for methyl bromide. J Environ Sci Health C 28: 125145 (2010).
  • 6. Mühle J, Huang J, Weiss RF, Prinn RG, Miller BR, Salameh PK et al., Sulfuryl fluoride in the global atmosphere. J Geophys Res-Atmos 114: 21562202 (2009).
  • 7. Shirmohammadi M, Study of mass transfer and hygroscopic properties of Australian mass-timber panels and species in hot and humid conditions-moisture sorption and desorption. Wood Mater Sci Eng 19: 220234 (2024).
  • 8.  EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH), Bragard C, Dehnen-Schmutz K, Serio F and Jacques M, Commodity risk assessment of oak logs with bark from the US for the oak wilt pathogen Bretziella fagacearum under an integrated systems approach. EFSA J 18:e06352 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6352.
  • 9. Shine KP and Kang Y, Radiative efficiencies and global warming potentials of agricultural fumigants. Environ Res commun 5:051007 (2023).
  • 10. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, SN/T 3401–2012, Rules for Fumigant Residue Detection After Plant Quarantine Fumigation. Standards Press of China, Beijing (2012).
  • 11. State Administration for Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, Announcement No. 2 of 2001, Quarantine requirements for imported logs. State Administration for Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing (2001).
  • 12. Barak A, Wang Y, Zhan G, Wu Y, Xu L and Huang Q, Sulfuryl fluoride as a quarantine treatment for Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in regulated wood packing material. J Econ Entomol 99: 16281635 (2006).
  • 13. Hall MKD and Adlam A, Comparison between the penetration characteristics of methyl bromide and ethanedinitrile through the bark of pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) logs. Pest Manag Sci 79: 14421451 (2023).
  • 14. Scheffrahn RH, Su NY and Hsu RC, Diffusion of methyl bromide and sulfuryl fluoride through selected structural wood matrices during fumigation. Mater Org 27: 147155 (1992).
  • 15. Ruzo L, Physical, chemical and environmental properties of selected chemical alternatives for the pre-plant use of methyl bromide as soil fumigant. Pest Manag Sci 62: 99113 (2006).
  • 16. Park M, Ren Y and Lee B, Preliminary study to evaluate ethanedinitrile (C2N2) for quarantine treatment of four wood destroying pests. Pest Manag Sci 77: 52135219 (2021).
  • 17. Armstrong JW, Brash DW and Waddell BC, Comprehensive Literature Review of Fumigants and Disinfestation Strategies, Methods and Techniques Pertinent to Potential Use as Quarantine Treatments for New Zealand Export Logs. Plant & Food Research SPTS No. 10678, Plant & Food Research, Palmerston North, New Zealand (2014).
  • 18. Hall MKD, Najar-Rodriguez AJ, Pranamornkith T, Adlam A, Hall A and Brash DW, Influence of dose, bark cover and end-grain sealing onethanedinitrile (C2N2) sorption by pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) logs. N Z Plant Prot 68: 1318 (2015).
  • 19. Barak AV, Wang Y, Xu L, Rong Z, Hang X and Zhan G, Methyl bromide as a quarantine treatment for Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in regulated wood packing material. J Econ Entomol 98: 19111916 (2005).
  • 20. Hall MKD, Najar-Rodriguez A, Adlam A, Hall A and Brash D, Sorption and desorption characteristics of methyl bromide during and after fumigation of pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) logs. Pest Manag Sci 73: 874879 (2017).
  • 21. Najar-Rodriguez AJ, Hall MKD, Adlam AR, Afsar S, Esfandi K, Wilks C et al., Efficacy of quarantine treatments using reduced methyl bromide concentrations to disinfest Pinus radiata logs from New Zealand. J Stored Prod Res 89:101718 (2020).
  • 22. Hall MKD, Machuca-Mesa LM, Uzunovic A, Yadav SK, Lee D and Nayak MK, Phosphine as a possible alternative to methyl bromide for the phytosanitary treatment of wood products. J Stored Prod Res 113:102672 (2025).
  • 23. Thiam M, Milota M and Leichti R, Effect of high-temperature drying on bending and shear strengths of western hemlock lumber. Forest Prod J 52: 6468 (2002).
  • 24.  United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA-APHIS), Treatment Manual. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC Available: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/plants/manuals/ports/downloads/treatment.pdf.
  • 25. Ren Y and Mahon D, Evaluation of microwave irradiation for analysis of carbonyl sulfide, carbon disulfide, cyanogen, ethyl formate, methyl bromide, sulfuryl fluoride, propylene oxide, and phosphine in hay. J Agric Food Chem 55: 3237 (2007).
  • 26. Wu L, Hu M, Li Z, Song Y, Yu C, Zhang H et al., Dynamic microwave-assisted extraction combined with continuous-flow microextraction for determination of pesticides in vegetables. Food Chem 192: 596602 (2016).
  • 27. International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC), Technical Panel on Forest Quarantine (TPFQ), Calculating CT values: Problems and Possible Solutions (TPFQ Paper for discussion, 2010-TPFQ-37). Rome: FAO (2010).
  • 28. Kozakiewicz P, Tymendorf ? and Trzci?ski G, Importance of the moisture content of large-sized scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) roundwood in its road transport. Forests 12:879 (2021).
  • 29. Safe Work Australia, Workplace exposure standards for airborne contaminants. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra (2019). Available: https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/system/files/documents/1912/workplace-exposure-standards-airborne-contaminants.pdf.
  • 30. Cross D, Penetration of methyl bromide into Pinus radiata wood and its significance for export quarantine. NZ J For Sci 21: 235245 (1992).
  • 31. Zhang Z, Use of sulfuryl fluoride as an alternative fumigant to methyl bromide in export log fumigation. NZ Plant Prot 59: 223227 (2006).
  • 32. Sorz J and Hietz P, Gas diffusion through wood: implications for oxygen supply. Trees 20: 3441 (2006).
  • 33. Bonifácio L, Sousa E, Naves P, Inacio M, Henriques J, Mota M et al., Efficacy of sulfuryl fluoride against the pinewood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Nematoda: Aphelenchidae), in Pinus pinaster boards. Pest Manag Sci 70: 613 (2014).
  • 34. Jagadeesan R, Nayak MK, Pavic H, Chandra K and Collins PJ, Susceptibility to sulfuryl fluoride and lack of cross-resistance to phosphine in developmental stages of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Pest Manag Sci 71: 13791386 (2015).
  • 35. Abrams AE, Kawagoe JC, Najar-Rodriguez A and Walse SS, Sulfuryl fluoride fumigation to control brown marmorated stink bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Postharvest Biol Technol 163:111111 (2020).
  • 36. United Nations Environment Programme, Special review on achieving control of pest eggs by sulfuryl fluoride, in Report of the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel, Volume 3: Essential uses and quarantine and pre-shipment uses of methyl bromide, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya, 110–136 (2011). Available: https://ozone.unep.org/sites/default/files/2019-05/TEAP_Progress_Report_May_2011.pdf.
  • 37. Stamm A, Density of wood substance, adsorption by wood, and permeability of wood. J Phys Chem A 33: 398414 (2002).
  • 38. Dang H, Han H, Zhang X, Chen S, Li M and Liu C, Key strategies underlying the adaptation of Mongolian scots pine (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica) in sandy land under climate change: a review. Forests 13:846 (2022).
  • 39. Song W, Zhao B, Liu D, Cherubini P, Li X, Jin K et al., Hydraulic conductivity regulates tree growth and drought resistance in semi-arid mixed forests of northern China. Ecol Indic 166:112471 (2024).
  • 40. Farooq T, Yasmeen S, Shakoor A, Nawaz M, Rashid M, Ahmad S et al., Xylem anatomical responses of Larix Gmelinii and Pinus Sylvestris influenced by the climate of Daxing’an mountains in Northeastern China. Front Plant Sci 14:1095888 (2023).