Research Studies
Study Tracker
Spatial extent and age-related bioaccumulation of fluoride in the bones of house sparrows around aluminium smelting operations.Abstract
Highlights
- Adult sparrows had higher bone fluoride (1062 mg/kg) than juveniles (606 mg/kg).
- Most (86 %) of adult sparrows exceeded background fluoride levels (600 mg/kg).
- Bone fluoride decreased with distance from aluminium smelting operations.
- Background bone fluoride levels only reached at ? 9.8 km from smelting facilities.
- Fluoride accumulation was related to changes in bone calcium-phosphorus ratios.
Industrial fluoride emissions negatively impact animal health and remain elevated over large areas surrounding point sources. Here, we examined the geographic and demographic determinants of fluoride exposure in 42 house sparrows (Passer domesticus) from 14 sites around two aluminium smelting operations in Australia. We found that bone fluoride concentrations increased with age and were significantly higher in adult (1062 mg/kg) than in juvenile (606 mg/kg) house sparrows. A corresponding increase was observed relative to body size metrics, indicating an association between fluoride accumulation and individual growth. In adults, this was accompanied by changes in bone mineral composition, with a significant decline in bone calcium-phosphorus ratios in fluoride exposed birds. Bone fluoride concentrations in adult house sparrows exceeded background levels (600 mg/kg) previously reported for Passerine birds inhabiting uncontaminated areas of New Zealand and North America. Bone fluoride decreased significantly with distance from aluminium smelting operations and, in adult house sparrows, only fell below background levels (600 mg/kg) at a distance of at least 9.8 km from smelting facilities. Vegetated buffer zones surrounding both smelters were insufficient to prevent elevated exposure to fluoride contamination. Our findings demonstrate the potentially far-reaching ecological impacts of industrial fluoride emissions and their age-related bioaccumulation in a sedentary urban bird.
Graphical abstract

EXCERPTS:
1. Introduction
Aluminium smelting is a leading source of atmospheric fluoride emissions (Fuge, 2019; Li et al., 2024). Gaseous and particulate emissions of fluoride released during the smelting process accumulate in soil and are taken up by vegetation (Brougham et al., 2013; Singh et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2023). In animals, chronic exposure can lead to osteofluorosis and the development of gross skeletal lesions (Charlotta Oddsdóttir, 2023; Death et al., 2018; Pascoe et al., 2014). Due to its accumulation in vegetation, herbivores are most susceptible to fluoride exposure and its toxic effects (Davis et al., 2016). However, bioaccumulation of fluoride poses a risk to a broad range of terrestrial and aquatic species (Zuo et al., 2018). Further understanding of the extent and severity of exposure to fluoride emissions in wildlife is essential to manage the ecological impacts of the aluminium industry under increasing global demand (Fuge, 2019).
Due to its low molecular weight, particulate emissions of fluoride can remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, enhancing its potential for long-range transport (Abdul-Wahab and Alsubhi, 2019; Yang et al., 2009; Zhong et al., 2017). Elevated concentrations in the environment and biota have been reported upwards of 10 km from emission sources (Abdul-Wahab and Alsubhi, 2019; Afanasyeva et al., 2021; Kierdorf and Kierdorf, 1999). Much of the research on exposure in wildlife has focused on ungulates and other herbivorous mammals which have large home ranges and are therefore more variably exposed to fluoride contamination (Charlotta Oddsdóttir, 2023; Death et al., 2019; Vikøren et al., 1996). Studies investigating exposure across contamination gradients are also rare, with many instead reporting fluoride concentrations from samples collected opportunistically from hunters or culling programs (Hufschmid et al., 2011; Kierdorf et al., 2012; Vikøren and Stuve, 1995). It is therefore not always possible to determine how fluoride concentrations measured in these animals relate to their proximity to the emission source and duration of exposure.
The systematic sampling of sedentary animals with greater site fidelity may provide a more precise indication of the distribution of fluoride exposure around aluminium smelters. Fluoride accumulates progressively in mineralised tissues over the life span of an animal, making bone a reliable indicator of long-term exposure (Flueck and Smith-Flueck, 2013). Therefore, measurements of mineralised tissues are less influenced by short-term fluctuations in environmental emissions or climate, at least compared to surveys of vegetation or soil (Brougham et al., 2013). Even for species where the risk of toxicity is low, understanding the extent of fluoride contamination around these sources is important because changes in bone mineral composition and structure can occur even at low levels of exposure (Iamandii et al., 2024; Pascoe et al., 2014).
Elevated concentrations of fluoride have been reported in birds inhabiting contaminated sites, suggesting bioaccumulation is a risk for some species (Henny and Burke, 1990; Vikøren and Stuve, 1995). However, few field-based studies of free-living birds around aluminium smelters are available, and to the best of our knowledge, no such research has been published in the last decade. Consequently, there remains some uncertainty regarding ecologically relevant levels of exposure to fluoride around industrial sources. Changes in bone morphology and declines in reproductive success have been observed in fluoride dosed birds (Bird and Massari, 1983; Chan et al., 1973; Merkley, 1981; Nahorniak et al., 1983; Shim et al., 2011). There is little evidence to suggest that these effects are widespread in birds exposed to environmentally realistic levels of fluoride contamination, such as that associated with aluminium smelting (Henny and Burke, 1990).
In this study, we investigated bone fluoride concentrations in two urban populations of house sparrows (Passer domesticus) surrounding aluminium smelting operations near the city of Portland, Victoria, and near the town of George Town, Tasmania, in Australia. Previously, chronic fluoride exposure has been linked to a high incidence of bone and dental lesions in eastern grey kangaroos (Macropus giganteus) inhabiting the vegetated buffer zone around the Portland Aluminium Smelter (Hufschmid et al., 2011, 2015). The extent and severity of exposure in non-mammalian species around these operations is unknown.
House sparrows are non-migratory, sedentary birds and have a limited home range (< 300 m radius; Vangestel et al., 2010). Previous research has demonstrated the utility of this species in the biomonitoring of environmental contamination risks to communities and ecosystems (Chik et al., 2025, Chik et al., 2025, Gillings et al., 2024a, Gillings et al., 2024b). The diet of adult house sparrows consists mostly of seeds and grains (Anderson, 2007). Fluoride taken up by vegetation is concentrated in leaf tips rather than seeds, and thus exposure through the ingestion of plant material may be less relevant for granivorous species than it is for some herbivores (Panda, 2015). However, house sparrows will also feed on invertebrates (Anderson, 2007), where fluoride is known to bioaccumulate at high concentrations (Aguirre-Sierra et al., 2013). Additionally, as a ground forager, house sparrows have a high soil ingestion rate and frequently ingest grit (Anderson, 2007; Gillings et al., 2024b). Fluoride uptake in this species is therefore anticipated to occur through a variety of environmental and dietary sources and should provide a general indication of exposure risk in species with a range of dietary preferences and foraging strategies.
By characterising the distribution and extent of exposure to aluminium smelting emissions in house sparrows, we aim to better understand the scale of ecological impacts from similar industries in other contexts. The populations studied here were located in residential areas outside the vegetated buffer zones surrounding either smelter, which are intended to limit the impact of emissions on surrounding populations, livestock, and ecosystems. We nonetheless expect fluoride levels in house sparrows to be higher at sites closer to the emission source. We also compare age and sex-related differences, as bone fluoride accumulates with age and sometimes differs between sexes (Vikøren and Stuve, 1996). Finally, to assess fitness consequences in the studied populations, we examine how bone mineral composition and the body condition of individuals varies across different levels of fluoride exposure.
2. Methods
2.1. Location and study sites
Fieldwork for the study was conducted in March 2023, towards the end of the house sparrow breeding season. Sites were located in residential areas beyond the vegetated buffer zones and along a northwesterly gradient from Portland Aluminium Smelter (?38.3828, 141.6345) near Portland, Victoria (Fig. 1a), and the Bell Bay Aluminium Smelter (?41.1287, 146.8682), near George Town, Tasmania (Fig. 1b). Between 2022 and 2023, annual fluoride emissions were 140,000 kg from the Portland Aluminium Smelter and 160,000 kg from the Bell Bay Aluminium Smelter (National Pollutant Inventory, 2024). Additional industry in these locations includes a shipping port in Portland, and a manganese smelter near George Town. Recent emissions data are not available for the shipping port in Portland, but historical data indicate that atmospheric fluoride emissions from this facility are low (National Pollutant Inventory, 2024). Estimated annual atmospheric fluoride emissions from the George Town manganese smelter were 5400 kg between 2022 and 2023 (National Pollutant Inventory, 2024). Portland and George Town are coastal, with variable wind speed and direction. Southerly and south-easterly winds, which would transport smelter emissions over the study sites in either location, occur at a daily frequency of 20–30 % around Portland and 10–40 % around George Town (Australian Bureau of Meteorology, 2024).

Fig. 1. Map of house sparrow catch sites in (a) Portland, Victoria, and (b) George Town, Tasmania, Australia. Hatched areas indicate location of aluminium smelters and other significant industries. Buffer zones indicate the extent of vegetated areas around either smelter. In Portland, previous studies of macropods (kangaroos, wallabies) were conducted in this area (Davis et al., 2016; Death et al., 2015; Hufschmid et al., 2011, 2015). Distance intervals are calculated from the centre of aluminium smelter precincts.
4. Discussion
In this study, we examined the distribution and extent of fluoride exposure in populations of house sparrows inhabiting urban areas near two aluminium smelters. We found evidence for elevated bone fluoride concentrations which were spatially related to aluminium smelting emissions and persisted over a large geographic area.
Across both locations in this study, there was only one site where bone fluoride concentrations in adult house sparrows (380–490 mg/kg, n = 2) were consistently below levels representing background concentrations (600 mg/kg) in mature passerine birds from uncontaminated areas (Table 1; Kay et al., 1975; Robertson and Lock, 1994; Stewart et al., 1974). This site was 11.5 km from the Portland Aluminium Smelter and is outside the range of significant emissions from this facility (Fig. 1a). In New Zealand, adult house sparrows inhabiting unindustrialised locations without significant emission sources had mean bone fluoride concentrations of 626 ± 412 mg/kg (Robertson and Lock, 1994). At an uncontaminated site in North America, similar concentrations (536 ± 311 mg/kg) have been reported for European magpies (Pica pica; Kay et al., 1975). Along with our findings, these studies indicate high variability in background bone fluoride concentrations within and between bird species which are likely related to differences in age and diet. The concentrations reported for these species, however, are consistently lower than those of birds inhabiting fluoride contaminated environments.
At catch sites within 5 km (the overall median distance of sites) of the smelting facilities in Portland and George Town, most house sparrows (90 %) had bone fluoride levels exceeding 600 mg/kg, and almost half of adults (43 %) within this distance exceeded 1200 mg/kg. This suggests that emissions from local aluminium smelting facilities are contributing to elevated bone fluoride levels in nearby house sparrows. The highest recorded concentration from adults in Portland (1200–1400 mg/kg, n = 2) and George Town (1400–1800 mg/kg, n = 2) were from the sites closest to aluminium smelting operations (Fig. 2). Similarly, in a survey of Canada geese (Branta canadensis) in Norway, the highest bone fluoride concentrations (1844–2156 mg/kg) were found in individuals sampled closest to an aluminium smelting facility (Vikøren and Stuve, 1995). Based on a limited number of samples (n = 9), similarly elevated fluoride levels (1094–3500 mg/kg) were reported in a population of house sparrows inhabiting areas around an aluminium smelter in New Zealand (Robertson and Lock, 1994). While these studies do not explore local-scale variability in exposure, they indicate that proximity to aluminium smelting operations is a primary determinant of elevated levels of fluoride in birds.
Few studies have investigated how the spatial distribution of industrial fluoride emissions influences exposure in wildlife at a site-specific scale. Here, bone fluoride concentrations in house sparrows decreased significantly with distance to the nearest aluminium smelter (Table 3, Fig. 2). The rate of decline indicates that background bone fluoride concentrations (600 mg/kg) in adult house sparrows would be reached at a distance of approximately 9.8 km and 18.1 km from the aluminium smelters in Portland and George Town, respectively. This relationship is based on sites located between 1.9 and 11.5 km from smelting facilities and does not account for higher fluoride deposition anticipated closer to the operations (Davis et al., 2016). Surveys indicate that fluoride concentrations in vegetation drop steeply within a 1 km radius of either smelter and more gradually outside this range (Bell Bay Aluminium, 2024; Davis et al., 2016). In other contexts, elevated fluoride concentrations in vegetation have been reported upwards of 10 km from the emission source (Afanasyeva et al., 2021), with impacts on herbivorous animals reported over similar distances (Kierdorf and Kierdorf, 1999). Our findings suggest that in house sparrows, levels of fluoride exposure associated with aluminium smelting emissions may remain elevated over a similar geographic extent.
Adjusting for site distance, mean bone fluoride levels in house sparrows from George Town were significantly higher than in Portland (Table 3). Data from the National Pollution Inventory (NPI) indicate that fluoride emissions from the Bell Bay Aluminium Smelter, near George Town, were approximately 14 % higher than emissions from the Portland Aluminium Smelter over the same time period (National Pollutant Inventory, 2024). Given that the distribution of sites was not significantly different between these two locations, higher fluoride emissions from the Bell Bay Aluminium Smelter may explain the higher bone fluoride levels detected in house sparrows from George Town. Other sources of contamination may also contribute to the observed differences between the populations. In George Town, for example, consistently elevated bone fluoride levels were measured in house sparrows from a peri-urban site approximately 7.5 km north of the smelter (Fig. 1b). The levels seen here could relate to the reported application of fluoride enriched phosphate fertilisers to pasture around this site (Fuge, 2019). This is corroborated by a spike in fluoride concentrations measured in vegetation at nearby monitoring sites over the house sparrow sampling period (Bell Bay Aluminium, 2024).
Age was also a significant predictor of variability in bone fluoride (Table 3). Mean bone fluoride concentrations in adult house sparrows (1062 mg/kg) were higher than in juveniles (603 mg/kg). We also identified a positive relationship between morphometric measurements and bone fluoride, suggesting that the rate of fluoride uptake into mineralised tissue is related to an individual’s body size, which often correlates with age. Growth rates are fastest during the early post-natal stages, and house sparrows, like most songbirds, leave their nest with limbs and bones that are still developing (Aldredge, 2016). This growth is supported by a protein rich invertebrate diet (Klva?ová et al., 2012). Since fluoride bioaccumulates in invertebrates (Aguirre-Sierra et al., 2013), the concentrations detected at this early life stage follow expectations. Bone fluoride in juveniles (aged 0–4 months) reached almost half of the concentration detected in adults (aged > 1 year) within at most four months of development. These findings are consistent with other studies examining age-related fluoride exposure in a range of animals, including birds. In black-crowned night herons (Nycticorax nycticorax) sampled downstream of a phosphate production plant, bone fluoride concentrations increased twice as much between hatchling and 1 year old birds than between 1 year old and 2 year old birds (Henny and Burke, 1990). This suggests that while overall levels in juveniles are lower than in mature individuals of the same species, juveniles are more susceptible to fluoride exposure due to its rapid accumulation in mineralised tissue during the early stages of development.
Sex-related differences in fluoride bioaccumulation in birds are less clear. Average bone fluoride concentrations were marginally higher in adult male than in female house sparrows, though this difference was not significant (Table 3). In experimentally dosed screech owls (Megascops asio), Pattee et al. (1988) found higher bone fluoride concentrations in females than in males. A similar difference was identified between male and female European herring gulls (Larus argentatus) from a colony adjacent to an aluminium smelter, but not from another colony at an uncontaminated site (Vikøren and Stuve, 1996). Similarly, no significant difference was found in the bone fluoride concentration of male and female goosanders (Mergus merganser) inhabiting uncontaminated areas in Poland (Kalisinska et al., 2014). Further research is needed to resolve sex-related differences in fluoride accumulation in wild birds.
Chronic fluoride exposure can lead to changes in bone mineral composition. In adult house sparrows, higher bone fluoride levels were associated with decreased bone phosphorus concentrations while calcium remained stable (Fig. 3a). In bone tissue, fluoride ions substitute for hydroxyl groups in hydroxyapatite, forming the more stable crystalline mineral fluorapatite (Ciosek et al., 2021). This process may alter normal phosphorus incorporation during bone mineralisation, contributing to reduced phosphorus content in the mineral matrix (Wang et al., 2025). In contrast, bone calcium is regulated by parathyroid hormone and other feedback mechanisms (e.g., vitamin D activity, renal reabsorption, and intestinal absorption) that may maintain calcium in homeostasis despite fluoride-induced changes in bone mineral composition (Simon et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2015). Phosphorus is essential for energy metabolism, cellular signalling, and maintaining bone strength, and so its apparent mobilisation from adult bone tissue has potential consequences on the fitness of these birds (Ciosek et al., 2021; Wagner, 2024). For example, reduced phosphorus availability could compromise flight performance through weakened bone structure and impair reproductive success by limiting phosphorus transfer to developing eggs and offspring (Bird and Massari, 1983; Pattee et al., 1988).
Despite evidence for changes in bone mineral composition, we did not observe any effect of fluoride exposure on body condition. Research on fluoride exposure in birds has demonstrated a high tolerance to doses above levels typically encountered around industrial sources. Xie and Sun (2003) found no evidence of skeletal fluorosis in Adelie penguins (Pygiscelis adeliae) and South Polar skua (Stercorariusmaccormicki) despite highly elevated bone fluoride concentrations (832–7187 mg/kg). Similarly, doses of 1120–2240 mg/kg of dietary fluoride did not disrupt organ development in American kestrels (Falco sparverius), though did lead to a reduction in bone strength (Bird and Massari, 1983). At lower and more environmentally realistic concentrations, screech owls (Megascops asio) dosed with 200 mg/kg of dietary fluoride were observed to have lower hatching success than control birds (Pattee et al., 1988). Fluoride concentrations exceeding 200 mg/kg are reported in vegetation around the Portland and George Town aluminium smelters, though these levels are largely confined to the vegetated buffer zones surrounding either operation (Bell Bay Aluminium, 2024; Davis et al., 2016). Additionally, much of the fluoride taken up by plants is stored in the foliage, not in the fruit or seed which is targeted by granivorous and frugivorous birds (Panda, 2015). It is therefore unlikely that the house sparrows studied here are at risk of exposure to fluoride at levels linked to negative reproductive outcomes in avian dosing studies. However, given the importance of phosphorus to egg development, its decline points to a mechanistic pathway whereby reproductive outcomes could be affected in fluoride exposed birds (Sinclair-Black et al., 2023).
Our findings indicate that the vegetated buffer zones established around aluminium smelters near Portland and George Town are insufficient to prevent elevated bone fluoride accumulation in surrounding wildlife. Within the buffer zone surrounding the Portland Aluminium Smelter, exposure to fluoride enriched vegetation has been attributed to skeletal and dental fluorosis in a range of marsupial species (Death et al., 2015; Hufschmid et al., 2015). Other studies have reported similar impacts in herbivorous mammals sampled at much greater distances from fluoride emission sources. For example, a high incidence of dental fluorosis was identified in red deer (Cervus elaphus) living over 10 km from power plants in the Czech Republic (Kierdorf and Kierdorf, 1999). Here, the large geographic extent of elevated fluoride exposure in house sparrows indicates heightened risk to the health of susceptible wildlife foraging within a similar distance of aluminium smelting facilities. The extent of exposure was not captured by existing vegetation surveys from either Portland or George Town (Bell Bay Aluminium, 2024; Davis et al., 2016), which underscores the value of sedentary species in monitoring fluoride emissions. The long-term bioaccumulation of fluoride in the bones of such species can reveal patterns of contamination not as apparent from more temporally variable vegetation data.
In this study, we investigated fluoride exposure in two populations of house sparrows inhabiting areas impacted by aluminium smelting emissions. Bone fluoride concentrations in adult house sparrows remained elevated compared to background levels up to a distance of at least 9.8 km from the emission source and well beyond the designated buffer zones surrounding each smelter. Our findings reveal the potentially large geographic extent of exposure to industrial fluoride emissions in wildlife surrounding aluminium smelting operations. They further show the susceptibility of sedentary animals to the age-related bioaccumulation of fluoride and its possible influence on bone mineral composition. Further research is needed to understand subtoxic effects in birds and other wildlife exposed to environmentally realistic levels of fluoride, such as that relevant to the contexts examined here. This will become increasingly important as a growing extent and diversity of ecosystems are impacted by fluoride emissions in response to rising global demand for aluminium and its production.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Funding
Declaration of competing interest
Acknowledgements
References
- Abdul-Wahab and Alsubhi, 2019
Modeling and analysis of hydrogen fluoride pollution from an aluminum smelter located in OmanSustain. Cities Soc., 51 (2019), Article 101802, 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101802
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarAfanasyeva et al., 2021
Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser., 28 (2021), pp. 62605-62615, 10.1007/s11356-021-15118-4
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarAguirre-Sierra et al., 2013
Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 65 (2013), pp. 244-250, 10.1007/s00244-013-9892-6
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarAldredge, 2016
Ibis, 158 (2016), pp. 16-27, 10.1111/ibi.12312
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarAnderson, 2007
Oxford University Press (2007), 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304114.001.0001
Australian Bureau of Meteorology, 2024
Australian Government (2024)
http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/
- Bell Bay Aluminium, 2024
Bell Bay Annual Environment Report 2024
Bell Bay Aluminium, Tasmania (2024)
Environ. Pollut. Ecol. Biol., 31 (1983), pp. 67-76, 10.1016/0143-1471(83)90053-3
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarBrougham et al., 2013
Environ. Pollut., 178 (2013), pp. 89-96, 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.007
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarChan et al., 1973
J. Nutr., 103 (1973), pp. 1431-1440, 10.1093/jn/103.10.1431
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarCharlotta Oddsdóttir et al., 2023
Icel. Agric. Sci., 36 (2023), pp. 3-19, 10.16886/IAS.2023.01
Animal Behav., 226 (2025), p. 123238, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2025.123238
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarChik et al., 2025
Environ. Res., 284 (2025), p. 122210, 10.1016/j.envres.2025.122210
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarCiosek et al., 2021
Biomolecules, 11 (2021), 10.3390/biom11040506
J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 64 (1981), pp. 1021-1026, 10.1093/jaoac/64.4.1021
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarDabeka et al., 1979
J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 62 (1979), pp. 1065-1069, 10.1093/jaoac/62.5.1065
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarDavis et al., 2016
Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser., 23 (2016), pp. 10165-10176, 10.1007/s11356-016-6234-z
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarDeath et al., 2015
Sci. Total Environ., 533 (2015), pp. 528-541, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.054
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarDeath et al., 2018
Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 162 (2018), pp. 383-390, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.06.062
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarDeath et al., 2019
Sci. Total Environ., 660 (2019), pp. 531-540, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.203
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarEngilis et al., 2018
Condor, 120 (2018), pp. 617-621, 10.1650/CONDOR-18-35.1
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarFlueck and Smith-Flueck, 2013
Eur. J. Wildl. Res., 59 (2013), pp. 899-903, 10.1007/s10344-013-0734-7
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarFuge, 2019
Appl. Geochem., 100 (2019), pp. 393-406, 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.12.016
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarGillings et al., 2024a
Environ. Sci. Technol., 58 (2024), pp. 10028-10040, 10.1021/acs.est.4c00946
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarGillings et al., 2024b
Environ. Res., 257 (2024), Article 119236, 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119236
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarHenny and Burke, 1990
Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 19 (1990), pp. 132-137, 10.1007/BF01059821
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarHufschmid et al., 2011
Ecotoxicology, 20 (2011), pp. 1378-1387, 10.1007/s10646-011-0695-0
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarHufschmid et al., 2015
J. Comp. Pathol., 153 (2015), pp. 167-184, 10.1016/j.jcpa.2015.06.002
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarIamandii et al., 2024
Eur. J. Publ. Health, 34 (1420) (2024), Article ckae144, 10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1420
Environ. Geochem. Health, 36 (2014), pp. 1063-1077, 10.1007/s10653-014-9615-6
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarKay et al., 1975
Fluoride, 8 (3) (1975), pp. 125-133
Google ScholarKierdorf et al., 2012
Sci. Total Environ., 414 (2012), pp. 686-695, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.10.041
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarKierdorf and Kierdorf, 1999
Environ. Monit. Assess., 57 (1999), pp. 265-275, 10.1023/A:1006095316438
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarKlva?ová et al., 2012
Bird Study, 59 (2012), pp. 58-66, 10.1080/00063657.2011.643291
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarKuzel et al., 2016
J. Forensic Sci., 61 (Suppl. 1) (2016), pp. S190-S192, 10.1111/1556-4029.12951
J. Hazard Mater., 478 (2024), Article 135500, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135500
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarLinhares et al., 2018
Chemosphere, 205 (2018), pp. 540-544, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.144
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarMerkley, 1981
Poult. Sci., 60 (1981), pp. 771-776, 10.3382/ps.0600771
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarNahorniak et al., 1983
Poult. Sci., 62 (1983), pp. 2048-2055, 10.3382/ps.0622048
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarNational Pollutant Inventory, 2024
Australian Government Department of the Environment and Energy28/01/2025 (2024)
Biol. Trace Elem. Res., 160 (2014), pp. 24-31, 10.1007/s12011-014-0017-5
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarPanda, 2015
Int. J. Biores. Environ. Agricult. Sci., 1 (2015), pp. 70-84
Google ScholarPascoe et al., 2014
Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess., 20 (2014), pp. 941-961, 10.1080/10807039.2012.750162
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarPattee et al., 1988
Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 17 (1988), pp. 213-218, 10.1007/BF01056027
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarPaul-Murphy et al., 2017
Am. J. Vet. Res., 78 (2017), pp. 887-899, 10.2460/ajvr.78.8.887
- Robertson and Lock, 1994
Fluoride in New Zealand Birds: a Review, Science and Research Series
Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand (1994)
Biol. Trace Elem. Res., 200 (2022), pp. 1710-1721, 10.1007/s12011-021-02782-3
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarShim et al., 2011
Poult. Sci., 90 (2011), pp. 1967-1974, 10.3382/ps.2010-01240
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarSimon et al., 2014
Osteoporos. Int., 25 (2014), pp. 1891-1903, 10.1007/s00198-014-2707-4
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarSinclair-Black et al., 2023
Front. Physiol., 14 (2023), 10.3389/fphys.2023.1112499
2023
Environ. Pollut., 239 (2018), pp. 95-108, 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.002
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarStewart et al., 1974
N. Z. J. Sci., 17 (1) (1974), pp. 105-113
Google ScholarTobechukwu et al., 2012
Int. J. Morphol., 30 (2012), pp. 425-427, 10.4067/s0717-95022012000200011
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarTon et al., 2022
Wilson J. Ornithol., 133 (2022), pp. 426-434, 10.1676/20-00077
Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 101 (2010), pp. 41-50, 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01493.x
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarVikøren and Stuve, 1995
Sci. Total Environ., 163 (1995), pp. 123-128, 10.1016/0048-9697(95)04498-P
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarVikøren and Stuve, 1996
J. Wildl. Dis., 32 (1996), pp. 190-198, 10.7589/0090-3558-32.2.190
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarVikøren et al., 1996
J. Wildl. Dis., 32 (1996), pp. 169-180, 10.7589/0090-3558-32.2.169
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarWagner, 2024
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., 39 (2024), pp. 190-201, 10.1093/ndt/gfad188
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarWang et al., 2023
Chemosphere, 341 (2023), Article 139901, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139901
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarWang et al., 2025
Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 500 (2025), Article 117357, 10.1016/j.taap.2025.117357
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarWang et al., 2015
Biol. Trace Elem. Res., 165 (2015), pp. 159-166, 10.1007/s12011-015-0245-3
Oecologia, 204 (2024), pp. 161-172, 10.1007/s00442-023-05495-7
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarXie and Sun, 2003
Environ. Geochem. Health, 25 (2003), pp. 483-490, 10.1023/B:EGAH.0000004578.77543.d5
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarYang et al., 2009
Sci. Total Environ., 407 (2009), pp. 4681-4686, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.05.005
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarZhong et al., 2017
Atmos. Environ., 167 (2017), pp. 40-48, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.08.014
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarZuo et al., 2018
Life Sci., 198 (2018), pp. 18-24, 10.1016/j.lfs.2018.02.001
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
FULL-TEXT STUDY ONLINE AT
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935125015658?via%3Dihub
