Abstract

Original abstract online at
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/15/6/379

Simple Summary

Sulfuryl fluoride (SF) was introduced as a fumigant in 1957 and widely used against stored product insects and dry wood termites in wood structures in warm climates. We conducted several experiments on the quarantine treatment of Japanese termites (Reticulitermes speratus) with SF. The efficacy against R. speratus in wood, as well as the wood sorption and penetration capacity, of SF were investigated. The LCt50 and LCt99 values of SF were calculated at two different temperatures and the differences between dry and wet wood at several loading ratios were evaluated as insignificant. Complete pest mortality was proven in scale-up trials with a 90% loading ratio of SF. The fumigant concentration decreased below the threshold limit after 30 min of ventilation. Compared with other alternative methyl bromide fumigants, the main advantages of SF were outlined. SF caused 100% termite mortality with a 90% loading ratio in the scale-up trials (500 L). The present study provides a basis for the use of SF as an alternative to MB for the treatment of termites in wood.
High-risk termites in wood imported to the Republic of Korea are currently treated with methyl bromide (MB), which has ozone-depleting properties and is highly toxic. This study evaluated the effectiveness of sulfuryl fluoride (SF) as a quarantine treatment against Reticulitermes speratus Kolbe (Blattodea: Rhinotermitidae) in wood, along with its wood sorption and penetration capacity. The LCt50 and LCt99 values for SF were 30.87 and 42.53 mg h/L at 23 °C and 151.62 and 401.9 mg h/L at 5 °C, respectively. The SF Ct values did not significantly differ between dry and wet wood at loading ratios of 10%, 30%, and 50% at both 5 °C and 23 °C (p > 0.05). In a closed wooden cube, the LCt50 and LCt99 for SF for R. speratus were 31.59 and 53.34 mg h/L, respectively, indicating an excellent wood penetration ability. SF caused 100% termite mortality with a 90% loading ratio in the scale-up trials (500 L). The SF concentration during ventilation decreased below the threshold limit value (TLV) of 5 ppm within 30 min, confirming that the working conditions were safe. This study provides a basis for the use of SF as an alternative to MB for the treatment of termites in wood.

 

EXCERPT:

The restricted stage of the termites and the small-scale trials used to determine the efficacy of SF were both limitations of this study. Future research should evaluate the efficacy of SF with a greater number of pests in a large-scale trial to assess its application in actual quarantine conditions. Since this study only evaluated R. speratus workers, it is necessary to determine the SF concentrations for other stages, such as eggs.
Nevertheless, this study determined the appropriate concentration and duration of SF needed to efficiently manage the newly identified pest, R. speratus, in wood. The relevance of the findings from this study, including the sorption and penetration of SF on wood depending on the loading ratio and moisture content of the wood, is also highlighted. This research will serve as a basis for the development of phytosanitary treatments using sulfuryl fluoride, which will reduce the use of MB in the wood trade. In addition, the commercial application of environmentally friendly and worker-friendly fumigants in the wood trade will create new markets for MB alternatives and improve the safety of quarantine sites.

 

Author Contributions

Project administration, supervision, funding acquisition, review and editing, M.-G.P.; investigation, methodology, formal analysis, N.-R.C.; formal analysis, writing—original draft preparation, validation, data curation, S.-Y.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

 

Funding

This study received support from the Animal Plant Quarantine Agency (APQA; project No.: PQ20233B011).

 

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

 

Acknowledgments

We thank Mee Jang of the Pest Control Division of the APQA for providing the information on the phytosanitary treatment guidelines in Korea.

 

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

 

References

  1. Zhou, X.; Wheeler, M.M.; Oi, F.M.; Scharf, M.E. Inhibition of termite cellulases by carbohydrate-based cellulase inhibitors: Evidence from in vitro biochemistry and in vivo feeding studies. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2008, 90, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Seo, S.-M.; Kim, J.; Lee, S.-G.; Shin, C.-H.; Shin, S.-C.; Park, I.-K. Fumigant antitermitic activity of plant essential oils and components from ajowan (Trachyspermum ammi), allspice (Pimenta dioica), caraway (Carum carvi), dill (Anethum graveolens), geranium (Pelargonium graveolens), and litsea (Litsea cubeba) oils against Japanese termite (Reticulitermes speratus Kolbe). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 6596–6602. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. JoongAngIlBo. A Termite, ‘Wooden Building Killer’, Attacks. Available online: https://www.joongang.co.kr/article/25199381 (accessed on 15 April 2024).
  4. DongAIlBo. ‘Termites’ That Destroy Houses Appear in Gangnam?… “If True, It’s Serious.”. Available online: https://www.donga.com/news/Society/article/all/20230518/119365380/2 (accessed on 15 April 2024).
  5. Kim, S.-H.; Chung, Y.-J. Analysis of factors affecting termite damage to wooden architectural heritage buildings in Korea. Forests 2022, 13, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Seo, S.-M.; Kim, J.; Kang, J.; Koh, S.-H.; Ahn, Y.-J.; Kang, K.-S.; Park, I.-K. Fumigant toxicity and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of 4 Asteraceae plant essential oils and their constituents against Japanese termite (Reticulitermes speratus Kolbe). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2014, 113, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Su, N.-Y. Novel technologies for subterranean termite control. Sociobiology 2002, 40, 95–102. [Google Scholar]
  8. APQA. Phytosanitary Disinfestation Guidelines. Available online: http://www.qia.go.kr/plant/disinpect/listXdclbzWebAction.do (accessed on 28 March 2024).
  9. APQA. Domestic and International Trends in Disinfection Research. Available online: https://www.qia.go.kr/plant/disinpect/plant_sterilize_study.jsp (accessed on 28 March 2024).
  10. Unep. Handbook for the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, 12th ed.; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2018; p. 918. [Google Scholar]
  11. IPPC. Recommendation on: Replacement or Reduction of the Use of Methyl Bromide as a Phytosanitary Measure; IPPC: Rome, Italy, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  12. Choi, J.; Cha, W.; Park, M.-G. Evaluation of the effect of photoplethysmograms on workers’ exposure to methyl bromide using second derivative. Front. Public Health 2023, 11, 1224143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Choi, J.; Hong, Y.-S.; Cha, W.; Mo, H.-h.; Park, M.-G. Heart rate variability analysis in workers exposed to methyl bromide as a quarantine treatment. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2021, 63, e32–e38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Park, M.-G.; Choi, J.; Hong, Y.-S.; Park, C.G.; Kim, B.-G.; Lee, S.-Y.; Lim, H.-J.; Mo, H.-h.; Lim, E.; Cha, W. Negative effect of methyl bromide fumigation work on the central nervous system. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0236694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kim, D.; Kim, K.W.; Park, M.-G.; Roh, G.-H.; Cha, D.H.; Lee, B.-H. New feasible quarantine disinfestation using ethyl formate for termites and ants on imported lumber. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2021, 24, 969–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Choi, K.-S.; Kim, H.K.; Lee, B.-H.; Kim, B.-S.; Yang, J.-H.; Koo, H.-N.; Kim, G.-H. Fumigant toxicity of phosphine to the Japanese termite, Reticulitermes speratus Kolbe (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 2014, 57, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Park, M.; Sung, B.; Hong, K.; Lee, B.; Ren, Y. The efficacy of ethanedinitrile to control wood related insect pests. In Proceedings of the 2005 Annual International Research Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions, San Diego, CA, USA, 3–6 November 2003. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jeon, J.-C.; Kim, H.-K.; Koo, H.-N.; Kim, B.-S.; Yang, J.-O.; Kim, G.-H. Synergistic Effect of Cold Treatment Combined with Ethyl Formate Fumigation against Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Insects 2022, 13, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. APQA. Efforts to Develop and Expand Use of Methyl Bromide (MB) Substitutes. Available online: https://www.qia.go.kr/viewwebQiaCom.do?id=56555&type=6_18_1bdsm (accessed on 12 February 2024).
  20. Su, N.-Y.; Scheffrahn, R.H. Field comparison of sulfuryl fluoride susceptibility among three termite species (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae, Rhinotermitidae) during structural fumigation. J. Econ. Entomol. 1986, 79, 903–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mühle, J.; Huang, J.; Weiss, R.; Prinn, R.; Miller, B.; Salameh, P.; Harth, C.; Fraser, P.; Porter, L.; Greally, B. Sulfuryl fluoride in the global atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2009, 114, D05306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Barak, A.V.; Wang, Y.; Zhan, G.; Wu, Y.; Xu, L.; Huang, Q. Sulfuryl fluoride as a quarantine treatment for Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in regulated wood packing material. J. Econ. Entomol. 2006, 99, 1628–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. IPPC. Phytosanitary Treatments for Regulated Pests; ISPM 28; FAO/IPPC: Rome, Italy, 2007; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ren, Y.L.; Lee, B.H.; Padovan, B. Penetration of methyl bromide, sulfuryl fluoride, ethanedinitrile and phosphine into timber blocks and the sorption rate of the fumigants. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2011, 47, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Park, M.-G.; Ren, Y.L.; Lee, B.-H. Preliminary study to evaluate ethanedinitrile (C2 N2) for quarantine treatment of four wood destroying pests. Pest Manag. Sci. 2021, 77, 5213–5219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Finney, D.J. Probit Analysis, 3rd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1971. [Google Scholar]
  27. Don-Pedro, K. Mode of action of fixed oils against eggs of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). Pestic. Sci. 1989, 26, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rajendran, S. Alternatives to methyl bromide as fumigants for stored food commodities. Pestic. Outlook 2001, 12, 249–253. [Google Scholar]
  29. NIOSH. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards: Sulfury Fluoride. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/npgd0581.html (accessed on 8 May 2024).
  30. Osbrink, W.L.; Scheffrahn, R.H.; Su, N.-Y.; Rust, M.K. Laboratory comparisons of sulfuryl fluoride toxicity and mean time of mortality among ten termite species (Isoptera: Hodotermitidae, Kalotermitidae, Rhinotermitidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 1987, 80, 1044–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Park, M.-G.; Park, C.-G.; Yang, J.-O.; Kim, G.-H.; Ren, Y.; Lee, B.-H.; Cha, D.H. Ethyl Formate as a Methyl Bromide Alternative for Phytosanitary Disinfestation of Imported Banana in Korea with Logistical Considerations. J. Econ. Entomol. 2020, 113, 1711–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lee, B.-H.; Hong, K.-J.; Park, M.-G. The Efficacy, Phytotoxicity, and Safety of Liquid Ethyl Formate Used to Control the Grape (Campbell Early) Quarantine Pest Pseudococcus comstocki. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 9769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Park, M.-G.; Lee, B.-H.; Yang, J.-O.; Kim, B.-S.; Roh, G.H.; Kendra, P.E.; Cha, D.H. Ethyl Formate as a Methyl Bromide Alternative for Fumigation of Citrus: Efficacy, Fruit Quality, and Workplace Safety. J. Econ. Entomol. 2021, 114, 2290–2296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kwon, T.-H.; Cho, J.-H.; Kim, D.-B.; Kwon, G.-M.; Hong, K.-J.; Ren, Y.; Lee, B.-H.; Park, M.-G. Ethyl Formate Fumigation for Control of the Scale Insect Asiacornococcus kaki, a Quarantine Pest on Sweet Persimmon, Diospyros kaki: Efficacy, Phytotoxicity and Safety. Insects 2023, 14, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Barreau, T.; Hoshiko, S.; Kreutzer, R.; Smorodinsky, S.; Talarico, J. Sulfuryl fluoride poisonings in structural fumigation, a highly regulated industry—Potential causes and solutions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]