Research Studies
Study Tracker
Unraveling the role of abnormal AMPK and CRMP-2 phosphorylation in developmental fluoride neurotoxicity: Implications for synaptic damage and neurological disorders.Abstract
Highlights
- NaF can lead to learning and memory ability impairment in F1 generation rats.
- NaF induced developmental neurotoxicity may be related to synaptic damage.
- NaF can cause abnormal phosphorylation of AMPK and CRMP-2.
Abstract
Excessive fluoride exposure can be neurotoxic, although the exact mechanism remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the neurotoxicity of continuous sodium fluoride exposure in offspring rats, focusing on the potential effects of fluoride exposure on hippocampal synaptic function and the role of AMPK and CRMP-2 in synaptic damage. We established an SD rat model of fluoride exposure (25, 50, and 100?mg/L NaF) and found that fluoride exposure damaged the learning and memory ability of F1 generation rats and caused ultrastructural changes in the hippocampus. Additionally, after the proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis of rat hippocampal tissues, the Gene Ontology analysis revealed that sodium fluoride was involved in the enrichment of neuronal differentiation, synaptic signaling, and cytoskeleton-related biological processes. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis showed that differential genes were enriched in synapse-related signaling pathways. Thus, we screened three differentially expressed proteins related to synaptic function for validation. The Western blotting analysis showed that AMPK and CRMP-2 were hyperphosphorylated in the hippocampus of fluoride-exposed rats. Our study found that abnormal AMPK and CRMP-2 phosphorylation leads to synaptic damage. This may be an important cause of memory impairment in fluorosis, offering new insights into the mechanism of fluoride-induced neurotoxicity.
Keywords: Fluorosis, AMPK and CRMP-2, Proteomics, Phosphorylation, Synaptic damage
1. Introduction
Fluoride, an essential trace element for humans and animals, is found in water, air, soil, vitamin supplements, agricultural chemicals, and toothpaste (Wang and Li, 2019, Caldas and Ricomini, 2022). According to the World Health Organization, the permissible limit of fluoride in drinking water is 1.5?mg/L. Although fluoride plays a key role in preventing dental caries, excessive fluoride exposure can cause dental fluorosis, osteofluorosis, and damage to non-bone organs (Zhou and Sun et al., 2023). Fluorosis currently remains a global public health problem (Patil and Lakhkar et al., 2018). Fluoride exposure is particularly damaging to the nervous system due to the non-regenerative nature of nerve cells (Dec and Lukomska et al., 2017). Previous literature demonstrated that fluoride can accumulate in the fetal brain during the perinatal period through the placenta and the blood-brain barrier, irreversibly damaging the nervous system (Castiblanco-Rubio and Martinez-Mier, 2022). The nervous system is particularly vulnerable during development, making it more susceptible to environmental pollutants like fluoride. Therefore, fluoride exposure is more harmful to fetuses than to adults. An epidemiological study showed that maternal fluoride exposure during pregnancy is strongly associated with lower intelligence quotient (IQ) in offsprings (Green and Lanphear et al., 2019). Animal studies also found memory and cognitive dysfunction in the offsprings of rats exposed to fluoride during pregnancy and lactation (Ferreira and Aragao et al., 2021). Despite the extensive evidence showing that excessive fluoride exposure can cause neurological damage, the specific underlying mechanism of neurotoxicity remains unclear.The hippocampus is one of the regions of the mammalian brain that contains neural stem cells capable of maintaining the production of new neurons. Furthermore, it contains the CA1, CA2, and CA3 regions, as well as the dentate gyrus (DG), an important organ in the central nervous system involved in learning and memory storage (Denoth-Lippuner and Jessberger, 2021). Studies demonstrated that learning and memory impairments are associated with abnormalities in hippocampal excitatory synapses (Choopani and Kiani, 2023, Gui and Liu, 2023). The normal synaptic structure is essential to maintain the normal functioning of the nervous system (Dejanovic and Sheng et al., 2024). Previous studies showed that fluorosis can alter the hippocampal synaptic structure and affect the neuronal transmission (Chen and Ning et al., 2017). Niu et al. (Niu and Chen et al., 2018) also found that high fluoride exposure led to synaptic ultrastructural changes in mouse hippocampal neurons. These changes included blurred synaptic gaps and increased postsynaptic density. Fluoride exposure can also promote the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines through extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and P38/MAPK signaling pathways, causing neuroinflammation, thereby affecting synaptic neuronal plasticity (Yang and Jin et al., 2018). Chen et al. (Lingli and Hongmei et al., 2023) showed that fluoride exposure activated the ras homolog family member A (RhoA)/Rho associated protein kinase (ROCK) signaling pathway, causing cytoskeletal damage and synaptic dysfunction. Despite the evidence illustrating that fluoride exposure can cause synaptic damage, the mechanism underlying synaptic damage leading to neurotoxicity is still not fully elucidated.Adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is an important energy sensor and metabolic regulator that inhibits neuronal polarization and axonal growth while regulating synaptic remodeling in senescent neurons (Belforte and Agostinone et al., 2021). AMPK comprises 3 subunits: ?, ?, and ?. The ? subunit consists of ?1 and ?2 subunits (PRKAA1, PRKAA2), with PRKAA1-encoding subunit ?1 being the key catalytic subunit of AMPK. PRKAA1 phosphorylation plays a major role in AMPK activation (Herzig and Shaw, 2018). Yang et al. (Yang and Mohammad et al., 2022) showed that AMPK activation changes synaptic protein content and reduces the abundance and distribution of neuronal synaptic proteins. Chu et al. (Chu and Cao et al., 2019) found that AMPK activation resulted in the loss of neuronal synapses. Collapsin response mediator protein (CRMP) is highly expressed in the brain during the early postnatal period, especially in regions with extensive neuronal plasticity, such as the hippocampus and the olfactory bulb, where CRMP-2 is widely expressed and plays an important role in synaptic transmission (Stratton and Boinon et al., 2020). Zhang et al. (Zhang and Kang et al., 2016) showed that CRMP-2 is associated with synapse formation. Additionally, they demonstrated that CRMP-2-knockout mice have abnormal hippocampal dendrite formation and defective synapse formation in CA1 neurons. Furthermore, the lack of CRMP2 in CRMP-2-knockout mice led to axon guidance defects, axonal pruning in the hippocampus and visual cortex, and altered dendritic spine remodeling. Many studies confirmed that fluoride can affect the normal structure of synapses and harm the nervous system, inducing cognitive deficits (Ge and Chen et al., 2018), oxidative stress (Lai and Chen et al., 2020), and inflammation (Yang and Jin et al., 2018). It remains unclear if AMPK and CRMP-2 serve as molecular markers for fluoride-induced synaptic damage.Proteomics and phosphoproteomics have been recently widely used to study the effects of fluoride on the nervous system (Ran and Xiang, 2021, Tang and Zhang, 2023). We found abnormal phosphorylation of AMPK and CRMP-2 proteins in fluoride-induced neurotoxicity through the proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis, which was verified by Western blotting. The aim was to identify key proteins and pathways involved in the regulation of synaptic structure and function, further providing new directions for fluoride-induced neurotoxicity and new perspectives for the treatment of fluoride-related diseases.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Animal and tissue processing
Twenty-four specific pathogen free (SPF)-grade adult sprague dawley (SD) rats were purchased from the Laboratory Animal Center of Xinjiang Medical University. The license number was SCXK (Xinjiang) 2018–0003. The Medical Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of the Medical College of Shihezi University approved all animal experiments related to this study (approval no. A2018–011–01). All the operations were performed in strict adherence to the principles of animal experimentation. The rats were maintained at 20–25? and 50?%–60?% humidity, with a 12-h light/dark cycle.After the 7-day acclimatization, all rats were randomly divided into 4 groups (6 rats in each group) according to their body weights and caged together according to the male to female ratio of 1:2. The rats were fed in single cages after conception. Four groups of pregnant rats were exposed to sodium fluoride (NaF) using ad libitum drinking water: control (water fluoride concentration <1?mg/L), 25, 50, and 100?mg/L NaF (corresponding to 11.3, 22.6, and 45.2?mg/L fluorion, respectively) groups. These dosage was based on our previous research (Niu and Chen, 2018) and real fluoride exposure levels in the world (it has been reported that fluorion concentrations in groundwater in most fluorosis areas are higher than 0.5?mg/L and up to 48?mg/L (Mumtaz et al., 2015). Until F1 generation weaning [i.e., 21 days after birth]. The F1 generation was reared separately from the parental generation and continued the manner and dosage of their parental treatment until sexual maturity (i.e., 2 months of age). Then, 6?F1 generation rats (male to female: 1:1) were randomly selected from each group and subjected to Morris water maze (MWM) experiments. After the MWM experiments, the F1 generation rats were executed, and their hippocampal samples were collected on ice. Three rats’ hippocampi were taken from each group for electron microscopy, and the hippocampal tissues of rats in control and 100?mg/L NaF groups were selected for the proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis. The remaining hippocampal samples were wrapped in tin foil and placed in liquid nitrogen for rapid freezing for 10?s, followed by the transfer to a ?80? refrigerator for storage.2.2. Chemical reagentsNaF was obtained from Sigma (USA). CRMP-2 antibody was provided by Proteintech (USA). p-CRMP-2 (Thr509) antibody was provided by Abcam (USA). p-CRMP-2 (Ser522) was obtained from Cusabio. PRKAA1 and p-PRKAA1 (Thr172) were obtained from Boster Biotech (China). p-PRKAA1 (Ser486) antibody was purchased from Invitrogen (USA). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (ZB-2301) and HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (ZB-2305) were purchased from ZSGB-BIO (China).
2.3. MWM test
The MWM instrument is an all-black circular pool with a height of 50?cm and a diameter of 180?cm, a cylindrical platform at the bottom of the pool with a height of 20?cm and a diameter of 8?cm, and a camera recording equipment above the pool. Before the experiment, water was injected into the pool, the water level was about 30?cm, and the water temperature of the pool was maintained at 22?±?1?. The pool is divided into four quadrants, and the cylindrical platform is placed in the center of the third quadrant. The platform position cannot be moved during the experiment.The MWM consists of two parts: the place navigation test (PNT) and the spatial probe test (SPT). During the first 4 days of PNT training, if the rats found the platform within 60?s, the time taken was recorded as escape latency, and then the rats were allowed to stand on the platform for 15?s. If the rat had not found the platform within 60?s, 60?s was recorded as the escape latency, and the rats were allowed to stand on the platform for 30?s. The escape latency, swimming distance, swimming speed, and swimming route of the rats were recorded during the experiment to evaluate the spatial learning and memory ability. SPT was carried out on day 5, the platform was removed, other experimental conditions remained unchanged, and the rats were allowed to enter the water from the first quadrant and swim freely in the pool for 60?s. During the experiment, the number of platform crossings, the time and distance in the target quadrant, and the swimming route were recorded to evaluate the memory retention ability of the rats.
2.4. Proteomic and phosphoproteomic analyses
2.4.1. Sample preparation
Sample preparation for proteomic and phosphoproteomic analyses was performed as previously described (Chen and Jiang et al., 2019). The hippocampal tissue was cut and grounded. Then, a lysate and phosphatase inhibitor mixture was added for cleavage, followed by extracting the protein supernatant. Each group contained 3 independent samples. Afterward, the protein concentration was measured using NanoDrop One. The total protein was incubated with dithiothreitol at 56? for 30?min and with iodoacetamide at room temperature in the dark for 15?min. Tetraethylammonium bromide was added to further dilute the sample. Then, trypsin was added and digested at 37? overnight. After digestion, the peptides were desalted with a solid phase extraction column, followed by tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling and phosphopeptide enrichment.
2.4.2. LC-MS/MS analysis
2.4.3. Bioinformatic analyses
2.5. Nissl staining
The paraffin-embedded hippocampus samples were sliced into 5?µm sections, separated by xylene, dehydrated by gradient ethanol, stained with cresol violet for 30?min, and washed with distilled water. Then soaked in 95?% alcohol for 5?min, made the slices transparent in xylene, covered with neutral gel, and finally viewed with a microscope.2.6. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)The rat hippocampus samples were cut into 1?mm3 blocks and fixed with glutaraldehyde at 4? for 4?h. It was then dehydrated with ethanol and acetone, infiltrated with epoxy resin, and embedded. Next, the embedded blocks were cut into 50?nm sections and stained with uranyl acetate for 20?min and lead citrate for 10?min. The images were observed by TEM.2.7. Western blot analysisNanoDrop One was used to detect protein concentrations extracted from the F1 generation hippocampus. The proteins were separated by electrophoresis of sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel and imprinted on a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane. Afterward, the membrane was closed with 5?% skim milk for at least 1?h. Then, primary antibodies (p-CRMP-2 [Thr509], 1:2000; p-CRMP-2 [Ser522], 1:1000; CRMP-2, 1:1000; PRKAA1, 1:1000; p-PRKAA1 [Thr172], 1:1000); p-PRKAA1 [Ser486], 1:1000); and GAPDH, 1:1000) were used at 4? for 16–18?h. Subsequently, the membrane was incubated with a secondary antibody (1:20,000) at room temperature for 2?h. The protein bands were observed using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents in a chemiluminescence apparatus. The protein band intensity was quantified using ImageJ software.2.8. Statistical analysisSPSS 26.0 software was used to analyze the data. Results were expressed as mean ±?standard deviation (SD). One-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey’s test, was used for multiple comparisons. Statistical significance was set at P?<?0.05.
3. Results
We used the MWM test to investigate the effects of NaF on learning and memory in rats. On days 3 and 4, the 100?mg/L NaF group showed significantly slower swimming speeds than the control (P?<?0.05; Fig. 1a). The daily escape latency and swimming distance showed a decreasing trend in NaF treatment and control groups. Among them, the escape latency of the 100?mg/L NaF treatment group was significantly longer than that of the control group at day 4 (P?<?0.05; Fig. 1b). The swimming distance of rats in the 100?mg/L NaF treatment group was significantly longer than that in the control group at day 1 (P?<?0.05; Fig. 1c). In the SPT experiment, the platform crossing frequency of offspring rats in 50?mg/L and 100?mg/L NaF treatment groups was significantly lower than that in the control group (P?<?0.05; Fig. 1e). The time and distance of the target quadrant in the offsprings treated with 100?mg/L NaF were significantly lower than in controls (P?<?0.05; Fig. 1f–g). Fig. 1d and h show the typical routes of PNT and SPT experiments, respectively.
Fig. 1. NaF exposure impaired the learning and memory ability of F1 generation rats. (a) The mean swimming speed to the platform. (b) The mean escape latency to the platform. (c) The mean swimming distance to the platform. (d) Representative traces in the PNT. (e) The number of platform crossings. (f) Time spent in the target quadrant. (g) Distance spent in the target quadrant. (h) Representative traces in the SPT. The data are presented for six rats in each group. *P?<?0.05 versus the control group.

Fig. 2. NaF exposure caused hippocampal tissue damage in F1 generation rats. (a) The Nissl staining in rat hippocampus. The black arrow points to Nissl bodies. (b) Ultrastructural observation of rat hippocampal region (n?=?3). The white arrow indicates damaged mitochondria. The five-pointed star indicates nuclear membrane wrinkled. Three rats were randomly selected from each group for evaluation.

Fig. 3. Proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis of the hippocampal tissue of F1 generation rats after NaF exposure. (a) Quantitative analyses of protein. (b) Quantitative analyses of phosphorylated protein. (c) Percentage distribution of phosphorylation sites. (d) Number of diferentially expressed proteins, phosphoproteins, and phosphosites identifed in the proteomic and phosphoproteomic analyses.

Fig. 4. GO enrichment analysis of proteins and phosphorylated proteins in the hippocampal tissues of F1 generation rats after NaF exposure. (a) Volcano plots of fold changes of proteins quantifed in the NaF group compared with the control group (Log2 (NaF/control)) against the signifcance (-Log10 (p-value)). (b) Hierarchically clustered heatmap of diferentially expressed phosphosites between the NaF and control groups. (c) Volcano plots of fold changes of phosphoproteins quantifed in the NaF group compared with the control group (Log2 (NaF/control)) against the signifcance (-Log10 (p-value)). (d) Hierarchically clustered heatmap of diferentially expressed proteins between NaF and control groups. (e) GO enrichment analysis.

Fig. 5. Abnormal AMPK and CRMP-2 phosphorylation plays an important role in fluoride-induced synaptic damage. (a) Phosphorylation of AMPK and CRMP-2 proteins in rat hippocampus. (b) Representative western blot images for phosphorylation of AMPK in rat hippocampus. (c) Quantitative analyses of the phosphorylation of AMPK proteins in rat hippocampus. (d) Representative western blot images for phosphorylation of CRMP-2 in rat hippocampus. (e) Quantitative analyses of the phosphorylation of CRMP-2 proteins in rat hippocampus. The data are presented as the means ±?S.D. for three different experiments. *P?<?0.05 versus the control group. **P?<?0.01 versus the control group. ***P?<?0.001 versus the control group.
4. Discussion
Conclusion
Statement
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Declaration of Competing InterestThe authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.AcknowledgmentsThis study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 82360671 and 82060580), the Shihezi University International Science and Technology Cooperation Promotion Programme Project (No. GJHZ202308), the Open Research Fund of Laboratory of Xinjiang Endemic Diseases Shihezi University, Ministry of Education (NO. KF2021–3), Shihezi University independently funded and supported university-level scientific research projects (No. ZZZC2023027), as well as the Bingtuan Program of Science and Technology Innovation (Grant No. 2021CB046).Appendix A. Supplementary material
Supplementary material
Supplementary material
Data availabilityThe data that has been used is confidential.
References
- Bashash and Thomas, 2017
“Prenatal Fluoride Exposure and Cognitive Outcomes in Children at 4 and 6-12 Years of Age in Mexico.”Environ. Health Perspect., 125 (9) (2017), Article 097017
Google ScholarBelforte and Agostinone, 2021
Google ScholarBittencourt and Dionizio, 2023
Google ScholarCaldas and Ricomini, 2022
- Castiblanco-Rubio and Martinez-Mier, 2022
“Fluoride Metabolism in Pregnant Women: A Narrative Review of the LiteratureMetabolites, 12 (4) (2022)
View PDFView articleGoogle ScholarChen and Niu, 2018
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarChen and Ning, 2017
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarChoopani and Kiani, 2023
Google ScholarChu and Cao, 2019
Google ScholarCole and Knebel, 2004
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarDec and Lukomska, 2017
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarDejanovic and Sheng, 2024
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarDenoth-Lippuner and Jessberger, 2021
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarDewey and England-Mason, 2023
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarFerreira and Aragao, 2021
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarGe and Chen, 2018
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
- Gopalan and Venkatramanan, 2023
Gopalan, J. and Venkatramanan A., (2023). “Fluoride – influenced presynaptic and MAPK – mediated TrkB signaling alterations, induced neurotoxicity (preprint)”. In Review.
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarGui and Liu, 2023
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarHerzig and Shaw, 2018
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarJiang and Li, 2019
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarLai and Chen, 2020
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarLee and Kondapalli, 2022
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarLingli and Hongmei, 2023
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarMumtaz and Pandey, 2015
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarNiu and Chen, 2018
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarNiu and Chen, 2018
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarPatil and Lakhkar, 2018
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarPetratos and Li, 2008
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarRan and Xiang, 2021
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarRan and Xiang, 2023
View in ScopusGoogle ScholarStratton and Boinon, 2020
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarTang and Zhang, 2023
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar
- Wakatsuki and Takahashi, 2021
“Small noncoding vault RNA modulates synapse formation by amplifying MAPK signalingJ. Cell Biol., 220 (2) (2021)
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarXu and Hu, 2023
- Yang and Mohammad, 2022
“Chronic AMPK Activation Reduces the Expression and Alters Distribution of Synaptic Proteins in Neuronal SH-SY5Y CellsCells, 11 (15) (2022)
- Yang and Jin, 2018
“Fluoride activates microglia, secretes inflammatory factors and influences synaptic neuron plasticity in the hippocampus of ratsNeurotoxicology, 69 (2018), pp. 108-120
- Zhang and Kang, 2016
“Brain-specific Crmp2 deletion leads to neuronal development deficits and behavioural impairments in miceNat. Commun., 7 (2016)
View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle ScholarZhou and Sun, 2023
- Zhou and Ikegaya, 2019
“The Astrocytic cAMP Pathway in Health and DiseaseInt J. Mol. Sci., 20 (3) (2019)
- Zhou and Okamoto, 2021
“Astrocytic cAMP modulates memory via synaptic plasticityProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118 (3) (2021)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651325005287?via%3Dihub