Fluoride Action Network

home // Researchers // U.S. Water Systems with High F Levels // Alabama (1993)

U.S. Water Systems with High F Levels

Database of drinking water systems with high levels of naturally occurring fluoride; searchable by state.

Alabama (1993)

Unless otherwise noted, the following information comes from the Fluoridation Census 1992 published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Oral Health, in 1993.

• It is not known if the water systems listed below are all still active
• The state Water System ID is the same as EPA’s preceded with the state’s initial. For example, Alabama would be AL0000000


State

Water Systems

County

EPA ID No.

Population

Natural Level
of Fluoride (ppm)

A Milligram per Liter (mg/L) is the same as Part Per Million (ppm)

Not all water fluoride levels are included in the Fluoridation Census 1992
Alabama Belk Fayette 0000595 548 0.7
Alabama Greenville Butler 0000125 8,353 0.7
Alabama Thomaston Marengo 0000919 799 0.7
Alabama Andalusia Covington 0000356 11,700 0.8
Alabama Forkland Greene 0001428 1,086 0.8
Alabama Brundidge Pike 0001110 2,472 1.0
Alabama Banks Pike 1111108 751 1.0
Alabama Orrville Dallas 0000484 221 1.1
Alabama Eutaw Greene 0000636 3,933 1.3
Alabama Greene County Greene 0000643 960 1.3
Alabama Hillsboro Lawrence 0000797 1,230 1.3
Alabama Starmont Subdivision Marengo 0000916 147 1.3
Alabama Camden Wilcox 0001374 3,575 1.4
Alabama Georgiana Butler 0000123 2,396 1.4
Alabama Ramer Montgomery 0001074 1,467 1.4
Alabama Wilcox Wilcox 0001371 2,880 1.4
Alabama Pine Apple Wilcox 0001391 426 1.9
Alabama Sellers Station Montgomery 0001077 1,500 2.2
Alabama Linden Marengo 0000914 3,334 3.6
Alabama South Marengo Marengo 0001439 1,983 3.6

Notes:

Please email Fluoride Action Network if you have information to share on levels of naturally occurring fluoride in U.S. drinking water or other bodies of water.

Percentage of State Population served by Public Water Systems that Receive Fluoridated Water
State 2014 2012 2006 2000 1992
Alabama 78.6% 78.4% 82.9% 89.2%
 82.6%

 

Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF
back to top