Fluoride Action Network

Promoting support for community water fluoridation. Testing message effects and the role of normative beliefs

Source: Journal of the American Dental Association, 152(12):P1012-1019; December 2021. | January 15th, 2022 | Authors: Kemp D, Mackert M, Bouchacourt L, Lazard AJ, Wolfe JO, Stewart B, Kahlor L, George C, Wagner JH, Wilcox G.
Industry type: Delta Dental

This study was published in December 2021.


Background
Despite evidence that community water fluoridation (CWF) protects oral health, improves health equity, is safe and cost-effective, and contributes to social well-being, little is known regarding which of these benefits should be highlighted to effectively influence support for CWF.

Methods
This within-participants study examines differences in CWF support in response to pro-CWF messages reflecting themes of oral health, health equity, CWF safety, cost-effectiveness, or social well-being among a sample of parents. Prior belief that CWF has health benefits, worry about potential health risks, and normative beliefs were also examined as independent predictors of support for each theme.

Results
Oral health, health equity, and safety messages significantly increased support in comparison with social well-being messages (P < .05). Oral health messages also produced greater support than cost-savings messages. Belief that CWF has health benefits positively predicted support, as did normative beliefs that one’s family and physician approve of CWF. Worry about health risks and community and dentist norms were not significant predictors of support. There were no interaction effects of message themes and prior beliefs.

Conclusions
Messaging focused on oral health, health equity, and the safety of CWF may be the most effective at influencing support for CWF. Preexisting personal beliefs about CWF benefits significantly predict support, but so do normative beliefs—family and physician norms in particular.

Practical Implications
Findings suggest dental health educators should emphasize CWF’s oral health benefits, such as preventing caries, over cost-saving and social well-being outcomes. They should also consider collaborating with family physicians to promote CWF and referencing other groups that may positively influence beliefs that CWF is beneficial.



Key Words


References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 75 Years of Community Water Fluoridation: Basic Tips for Good Oral Health. Accessed June 14, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation/basics/anniversary.htm
  2. Neidell M, Herzog K, Glied S. The association between community water fluoridation and adult tooth loss. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100: 1980-1985. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20724674/
  3. Slade G.D., Grider W.B, Maas W.R., Sanders A.E. Water fluoridation and dental caries in US children and adolescents. J Dent Res. 2018; 97: 1122-1128. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29900806/
  4. Kumar J.V., Adekugbe O., Melnik T.A. Geographic variation in Medicaid claims for dental procedures in New York State: role of fluoridation under contemporary conditions. Public Health Rep. 2010; 125: 647-654. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20873280/
  5. Ran T., Chattopadhyay S.K., Community Preventive Services Task Force. Economic evaluation of community water fluoridation: a community guide systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2016; 50: 790-796. https://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(15)00691-1/fulltext
  6. Glied S., Neidell M. The economic value of teeth. J Hum Resour. 2010; 45: 468-496
  7. Chuck E. Science Says Fluoride in Water Is Good for Kids. So Why Are These Towns Banning It? NBC News. October 17, 2018. Accessed June 14, 2021. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/science-says-fluoride-water-good-kids-so-why-are-these-n920851
  8. Texas Health Institute. Oral Health in Texas: Bridging Gaps and Filling Needs. 2018. Accessed June 14, 2021.
    https://www.texashealthinstitute.org/uploads/3/9/5/2/39521365/thi_report_final.pdf
  9. American Dental Association Fluoridation Facts. 2018. Accessed June 14, 2021. https://www.readcube.com/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1752-7325.1955.tb01558.x
  10. Mork N., Griffin S. Perceived safety and benefit of community water fluoridation: 2009 HealthStyles survey. J Public Health Dent. 2015; 75: 327-336. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26147330/
  11. Curiel J.A., Sanders A.E., Christian T.M.L. et al. Fluoridation advocacy in referenda where media coverage is balanced yet biased. JADA. 2018; 149: 273-280.e3 https://jada.ada.org/article/S0002-8177(17)30986-8/fulltext
  12. Allukian Jr., M., Carter-Pokras O.D., Gooch B.F., et al. Science, politics, and communication: the case of community water fluoridation in the US. Ann Epidemiol. 2018; 28: 401-410. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28648551/
  13. Chadwick A., Lamia T., Zaro-Moore J. Exploring Factors Associated with Fluoridation Referenda Outcomes. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2008. Accessed June 15, 2021.
    http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/chadwick.hhs-cdc-20081.pdf
  14. Manchir M. I Love Fluoride’ Campaign Proves Effective in New York. ADA News. October 1, 2018. Accessed June 14, 2021.https://www.ada.org/en/publications/ada-news/2018-archive/october/i-love-fluoride-campaign-proves-effective-in-new-york
  15. Krisberg K. Public health messaging: how it is said can influence behaviors: beyond the facts. Nations Health. 2014; 44: 1-20. Google Scholar
  16. Yeung C.A. A systematic review of the efficacy and safety of fluoridation. Evid Based Dent. 2008; 9: 39-43. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18584000/
  17. Burt B.A. Fluoridation and social equity. J Public Health Dent. 2002; 62: 195-200. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12474623/
  18. Armfield J.M., Akers H.F. Community water fluoridation support and opposition in Australia. Community Dent Health. 2011; 28: 40-46. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21485233/
  19. Furukawa S., Hagiwara Y., Taguchi C., Turumoto A., Kobayashi S. Associations between oral health behavior and anxiety about water fluoridation and motivation to establish water fluoridation in Japanese residents. J Oral Sci. 2011; 53: 313-319. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21959658/
  20. Perrella A.M.L., Kiss S.J. Risk perception, psychological heuristics and the water fluoridation controversy. Can J Public Health. 2015; 106: e197-e203. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26285190/
  21. Tedesco L.A., Keffer M.A., Fleck-Kandath C. Self-efficacy, reasoned action, and oral health behavior reports: a social cognitive approach to compliance. J Behav Med. 1991; 14: 341-355. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1942013/
  22. Jonsson B., Baker S.R., Lindberg P., Oscarson N., Ohrn K. Factors influencing oral hygiene behaviour and gingival outcomes 3 and 12 months after initial periodontal treatment: an exploratory test of an extended theory of reasoned action. J Clin Periodontol. 2012; 39: 138-144. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22145743/
  23. Eckhardt A., Laumer S., Weitzel T. Who influences whom? Analyzing workplace referents’ social influence on IT adoption and non-adoption. J Inf Technol. 2009; 24: 11-24. Google Scholar
  24. Larimer M.E., Kaysen D.L., Lee C.M. et al. Evaluating level of specificity of normative referents in relation to personal drinking behavior. J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl. 2009; : 115-121. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19538919/
  25. Yun D., Silk K.J. Social norms, self-identity, and attention to social comparison information in the context of exercise and healthy diet behavior. Health Commun. 2011; 26: 275-285. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21400325/
  26. Arora A., Evans R.W., Sivaneswaran S., Sujeer A.N., Blinkhorn A.S. Parental support for water fluoridation in Lithgow, New South Wales. Aust Dent J. 2010; 55: 417-422. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21133941/
  27. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). Federal Office of Rural Health Policy (FORHP) Data Files: FORHP Eligible ZIP Codes. US Department of Health & Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration. Last reviewed January 2021. Accessed June 15, 2021. https://www.hrsa.gov/rural-health/about-us/definition/datafiles.html
  28. Scherzer T., Barker J.C., Pollick H., Weintraub J.A. Water consumption beliefs and practices in a rural Latino community: implications for fluoridation. J Public Health Dent. 2010; 70: 337-343. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20735717/
  29. Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2010; 15: 625-632. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20146096/
  30. Horowitz H.S. The effectiveness of community water fluoridation in the United States. J Public Health Dent. 1996; 56: 253-258. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9034970/
  31. Brewer N.T., Hall M.G., Noar S.M. et al. Effect of pictorial cigarette pack warnings on changes in smoking behavior: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2016; 176: 905-912. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27273839/
  32. Frieden T.R. A framework for public health action: the health impact pyramid. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100: 590-595. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20167880/
  33. Dye B.A., Mitnik G.L., Iafolla T.J., Vargas C.M. Trends in dental caries in children and adolescents according to poverty status in the United States from 1999 through 2004 and from 2011 through 2014. JADA. 2017; 148: 550-565.e7 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28619207/
  34. Annie E., Casey Foundation. Kids Count Data Center: Texas Indicators. Annie E. Casey Foundation; 2021. Accessed June 15, 2021. https://datacenter.kidscount.org/data#TX/2/0

Biography

Dr. Kemp is an assistant professor, Stan Richards School of Advertising & Public Relations, Moody College of Communication, and a faculty affiliate, Center for Health Communication, University of Texas at Austin, 300 W Dean Keeton St (A1200), BMC 4.338, Austin, TX 78712

Biography

Dr. Mackert is the director, Center for Health Communication, and a professor, Stan Richards School of Advertising & Public Relations, Moody College of Communication, and Department of Population Health, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.

Biography

Ms. Bouchacourt is a doctoral candidate, Stan Richards School of Advertising & Public Relations, Moody College of Communication, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.

Biography

Dr. Lazard is the E. Reese Felts Jr. Distinguished Associate Professor, Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; and a faculty affiliate, Center for Health Communication, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.

Biography

Dr. Wolfe was the director of the Oral Health Program, Texas Health Institute, Austin, TX, when this study was conducted. She is now an assistant professor, Department of Public Health, A.T. Still University, Kirksville, MO.

Biography

Ms. Stewart is the executive director, Texas Oral Health Coalition, Midland, TX.

Biography

Dr. Kahlor is a professor, Stan Richards School of Advertising & Public Relations, Moody College of Communication, and a faculty affiliate, Center for Health Communication, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.

Biography

Ms. George was a senior project coordinator, Center for Health Communication, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, when the work described in this article was conducted. She now is the assistant director for marketing and communications, Texas Global, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.

Biography

Ms. Wagner is the deputy director, Center for Health Communication, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.

Biography

Dr. Wilcox is the John A. Beck Centennial Professor in Communication, Stan Richards School of Advertising & Public Relations, Moody College of Communication, an associated faculty, Department of Statistics and Data Sciences, and a faculty affiliate, Center for Health Communication, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.