Abstract

The use of fluoride supplements to prevent caries has been advised for more than 100 years, but serious promotion of this strategy occurred only after the effectiveness of water fluoridation was established, in the late 1950s and 1960s. Although the effectiveness of fluoride supplements was apparently endorsed by many small clinical studies, closer examination of the experimental conditions of these, their methods and the analysis of their results undermined confidence in their findings. It is likely that confounding resulted in spurious conclusions in many of them. More modern, well-conducted clinical trials of supplements suggest that today, in children also exposed to fluoride from other sources such as toothpaste, the marginal effect of fluoride supplements is very small. There is evidence that fluoride lozenges, designed to maximise any local effect, may have a small caries preventive effect, particularly in deciduous teeth. Overall, poor compliance makes fluoride supplements a poor public health measure. Supplement use by young children is associated with a substantial risk of dental fluorosis. Fluorosis is an issue about which the public is becoming concerned in several countries and this concern, if translated into opposition to all fluoride use, could jeopardise the most successful caries preventive aid we have. The potential for dental fluorosis, concern about the public’s reaction to this, the poor effectiveness of supplements and the public’s poor compliance with their use are persuasive arguments for a radical reduction in the use of supplements by young children. Recent changes in fluoride dosage schedules and deferment of the age of commencing the use of supplements, implemented in many countries, have followed from these concerns. Supplements formulated as lozenges maximise topical exposure of enamel to fluoride and such products may offer older children and some adults a way of maintaining an elevated fluoride level in saliva at times when toothbrushing is not practical.

• Related Studies :

  • Risk of enamel fluorosis associated with fluoride supplementation, infant formula, and fluoride dentifrice use.

    Eight hundred fifty 11- to 14-year-old residents of nonfluoridated communities in Massachusetts and Connecticut, who were born between 1972 and 1975, were investigated in a case-control study of the possible association between enamel fluorosis and exposure to fluoride supplements, infant formula, and/or fluoride dentifrice. The effect of median household income,

  • The case for eliminating the use of dietary fluoride supplements for young children.

    Fluoride supplements have been used for years to prevent dental caries; nevertheless, there are three reasons why their use is inappropriate today among infants and young children in the United States. Evidence for the efficacy of fluoride supplements when used from birth or soon after is weak, supplements are a

  • Systemic fluoride. Sources, amounts, and effects of ingestion

    Fluoride may be ingested from a variety of sources, including many foods and beverages. Fluoride intake varies greatly among individuals and is dependent on dietary constituents and use of fluoride products. Although ingestion of toxic amounts of fluoride is rare, the prevalence of dental fluorosis has increased in North America, suggesting that the levels of fluoride ingestion

  • The Role of Fluoride in the Prevention of Tooth Decay

    KEYWORDS • Dental caries
    • Dental decay
    • Oral health
    • Fluorides
    • Primary prevention •
    Secondary prevention
    • Children KEY POINTS • Fluoride is the key to prevention of tooth decay. •
    There are multiple fluoride modalities. •
    Effectiveness and safety of fluoride depend on dose and concentration. •
    Individual level

  • Risk factors associated with fluorosis in a non-fluoridated population in Norway.

    In Norway, there is no water fluoridation and little naturally occurring fluoride in drinking water. Fluoride toothpaste is used by 95% of the population and there is a long tradition of fluoride supplement use. The purpose of this study was to record the prevalence and severity of dental fluorosis in

• Related FAN Content :

  • Moderate/Severe Dental Fluorosis

    In its "moderate" and severe forms, fluoride causes a marked increase in the porosity of the enamel. After eruption into mouth, the porous enamel of moderate to severe fluorosis readily takes up stain, creating permanent brown and black discolorations of the teeth. In addition to extensive staining, teeth with moderate to severe fluorosis are more prone to attrition and wear - leading to pitting, chipping, and decay.

  • Another Fluoride Fatality: A Physician's Dilemma

    Why do physicians fail to correctly evaluate the toxicity of fluoride? Most textbooks rely on the now outdated views of Smith and Hodge who 25 years ago designated 5 to 10 g of fluoride the fatal toxic dose.

  • Dental Fluorosis Is a "Hypo-mineralization" of Enamel

    Teeth with fluorosis have an increase in porosity in the subsurface enamel ("hypomineralization"). The increased porosity of enamel found in fluorosis is a result of a fluoride-induced impairment in the clearance of proteins (amelogenins) from the developing teeth. Despite over 50 years of research, the exact mechanism by which fluoride impairs amelogin

  • "Mild" Dental Fluorosis: Perceptions & Psychological Impact

    The vast majority of research has found that patients, parents, and the general public alike view mild fluorosis (TF score 3) as a significant blemish of the teeth, one that is likely to embarrass the affected child to a degree that cosmetic treatment would be warranted.

  • Prenatal and postnatal ingestion of fluorides - A progress report.

    The cases described indicate that certain patients react unfavorably to fluoride therapy. Whether the fluorine acts as an allergen after short term use or whether the fluorine acts as an intoxicant after many months of use, is unknown and should be determined.