Note from Fluoride Action Network:
We have labeled this article misinformation because it states that “Fluoridation is safe“. No federal agency in any country has performed a health risk assessment on fluoridation’s effects on the pregnant woman, the fetus, or infant up to six months of age. The Mother-Offspring fluoride studies have reported that the fetus and the formula-fed infant (Till et al., 2020) are the most vulnerable to fluoride’s neurotoxicity. Two of these studies were done in Canada and published by Canadian researchers (Green et al., 2019 and Till et al., 2020). There are also 74 published studies reporting an association of fluoride exposure and lower IQ. The authors mention reports from pro-fluoridation countries (Australia, Canada & Ireland) but fail to mention U.S.-governmentfunded-studies on fluoride’s neurotoxicity, including the Till and Green studies. (EC)

Water fluoridation is effective in reducing dental decay by approximately 25-30 per cent in children and adults.

The federal government has announced in its 2022 budget that it will spend $5.3 billion over five years on a national dental care plan for many Canadians. The first people to benefit will be children, then low-income Canadians.

The federal government is set to spend billions on a new dental care plan, but water supply fluoridation is a better option that would help everyone.

But prevention is better than treatment, and also less expensive. The best method of dental decay prevention is through community water fluoridation. This public health measure effectively helps everyone; it is safe, cost-effective and equitable. Fiscal responsibility means the federal government should support not just treatment but also prevention.

Fluoride refers to compounds containing the negative ion of the element fluorine. Community water fluoridation adjusts the naturally existing level of fluoride in the drinking water to 0.7 parts per million. Evidence over more than 75 years shows that this public health measure significantly reduces cavities in children and provides further benefits throughout life.

Since the 1960s, many Canadian cities have benefitted from fluoridation, including Toronto, Ottawa, Edmonton, Winnipeg, Hamilton, London, Halifax and Saskatoon. Windsor and Calgary had fluoridation and ceased it, although both cities have recently decided to reinstate it.

The Public Health Agency of Canada reported in 2017 that only 38.7 per cent of Canadians had fluoridated water. In Quebec, British Columbia, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and the Yukon, less than five per cent of the population had this benefit. By contrast, the United States Centers for Disease Control reported in 2018 that 63.4 per cent of the total U.S. population had fluoridated water.

Regina voted in August to institute fluoridation and while the trend continues in this positive direction, many of Canada’s great cities are unfluoridated including Vancouver, Quebec City, Victoria and parts of Montreal. So are many small cities and towns. There is wide disparity in coverage across the provinces and territories (figure 1).

Fluoridation, like vaccination, generates two controversies.

The first is whether the good of the community should prevail over the preferences of some individuals. The British Columbia Court of Appeal ruled in 2004 that when a majority votes for water fluoridation, a litigant cannot succeed in seeking fluoridation cessation. The Supreme Court of Canada refused to hear an appeal of this ruling.

The second issue concerns the torrents of misinformation that appear, even in the peer- reviewed literature. This false information must be countered by the continuous dissemination of reliable information from credible sources. The federal government, through the Public Health Agency of Canada, is in a strong position to communicate with dedicated, consistent messaging – in the languages spoken across Canada. As voting showed in Windsor in 2018 and Calgary in 2021, when accurate information is presented, fluoridation is a prized community health benefit.

The reasons are many. Water fluoridation is effective in reducing dental decay by approximately 25-30 per cent in children and adults.

Fluoride helps to prevent cavities both systemically (before the teeth emerge) and topically (on the tooth surface). Scientific studies in Calgary, Windsor and Juneau, Alaska clearly demonstrate that when fluoridation ceases, the rate of dental decay in children rises dramatically, even with the use of fluoride toothpaste.

Fluoridation is safe. Numerous national reviews, such as Australia, 2017, Ireland, 2018, and Canada, 2019 found no evidence for concern about water fluoridation. There is a small risk of minor tooth enamel discolouration, though such teeth are more resistant to decay. A Canadian study frequently cited by fluoridation opponents that claims fluoridation harms the brain has been discredited based on its methods and also by much better-designed studies with much larger populations.

Fluoridation is cost-effective. The Canadian Agency on Drugs and Technologies in Health conducted a budget impact analysis that reported that the savings from avoiding dental decay far outweigh the costs of implementing fluoridation, with cost effectiveness rising with the size of the population served by the water network. In Calgary, the cost of fluoridation is $1.01 per resident per year (using 2021 census data) with savings estimated at $54 annually. New technology makes fluoridation easy and cost-efficient even for rural and remote populations of only 50 people.

Fluoridation promotes equity. Dental decay is the most common chronic disease of childhood. Untreated dental decay prevents children from eating, sleeping, playing, concentrating and learning. Poor children in unfluoridated areas in the U.K. have 27 times increased risk of hospital admission for dental extractions than those in fluoridated areas. Dental decay disproportionately affects older people, Indigenous people, new Canadians and people with disabilities.

Our government should help the most vulnerable pay for dental treatment. But it is even more important to prevent dental decay through water fluoridation, just as seat belts are better than trauma care.

Yet, there is a gap in responsibility: water supplies are mostly controlled by municipal authorities, but local councillors have little background or understanding about fluoridation. The federal government can act within its jurisdiction: in water supplies for Indigenous communities and Canadian Forces bases.

As part of its new dental program, the Canadian government must help bring fluoridation to as many Canadians as possible, through provincially managed municipal grants if necessary. When people understand, they support such proposals. Therefore, the government must launch a national public health information campaign to tell all Canadians about the great benefits of water fluoridation.

Do you have something to say about the article you just read? Be part of the Policy Options discussion, and send in your own submission, or a letter to the editor.

Juliet Guichon

Juliet Guichon is an associate professor, law and ethics, in the Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, and president of Calgarians for Kids’ Health and Fluoride Yes!, which helped Calgary return to water fluoridation in 2021. Twitter @JulietGuichon

James Dickinson

James Dickinson is a professor of family medicine and epidemiology at the Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and member of Calgarians for Kids’ Health and Fluoride Yes!, which helped Calgary return to water fluoridation in 2021.

Ian Mitchell

Ian Mitchell has received national lifetime achievement awards in pediatrics and bioethics. He is a clinical professor of pediatrics at the Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and member of Calgarians for Kids’ Health and Fluoride Yes!, which helped Calgary return to water fluoridation in 2021.