our most valuable asset is you. with your help, we can create change.

Sign up for our free newsletter for updates on the latest fluoride developments.
Find ways to get involved.

fan newsletter

back to top

Fluoride Action Network

  • New Visitors
  • Take Action
  • Researchers
  • Join Us
  • Donate
    • Issues
      • TSCA Fluoride Lawsuit
      • NTP Fluoride Review
      • Fluoride is the New Lead
      • Fluoride Neurotoxicity
      • What Is Water Fluoridation?
      • Fluoride In Dental Products
      • Dental Fluorosis
      • Health Effects Of Fluoride
      • Fluoride’s Role In Tooth Decay
      • Sources of Fluoride
      • Infant Fluoride Exposure
      • Fluoride & Environmental Justice
      • Fluoride Pollution
      • Fluoride Politics
    • F.A.Q.
    • About FAN
      • Contact FAN
      • FAN’s Accomplishments
      • FAN In The News
      • FAN Bulletins
      • Our Team
    • Tool Kit
      • Video: Steps to End Fluoridation in Your Community
      • Fluoridation Neurotoxicity One-Pager
      • Fluoridation Efficacy One-Pager
      • 10 Facts About Fluoride Handout
      • 50 Reasons To Oppose Fluoridation
      • Water Fluoridation Infographic
      • 10 Ways To Avoid Fluoride Exposure
      • A Response To Pro-Fluoridation Claims
      • World-Wide Alliance One-Pager
    • FAN.tv
≡ 
Menu
  • New Visitors
  • Take Action
  • Researchers
  • Issues
    • TSCA Fluoride Lawsuit
    • NTP Fluoride Review
    • Fluoride is the New Lead
    • Fluoride Neurotoxicity
    • What Is Water Fluoridation?
    • Fluoride In Dental Products
    • Dental Fluorosis
    • Health Effects Of Fluoride
    • Fluoride’s Role In Tooth Decay
    • Sources of Fluoride
    • Infant Fluoride Exposure
    • Fluoride & Environmental Justice
    • Fluoride Pollution
    • Fluoride Politics
  • F.A.Q.
  • About FAN
    • Contact FAN
    • FAN’s Accomplishments
    • FAN In The News
    • FAN Bulletins
    • Our Team
  • Tool Kit
    • Video: Steps to End Fluoridation in Your Community
    • Fluoridation Neurotoxicity One-Pager
    • Fluoridation Efficacy One-Pager
    • 10 Facts About Fluoride Handout
    • 50 Reasons To Oppose Fluoridation
    • Water Fluoridation Infographic
    • 10 Ways To Avoid Fluoride Exposure
    • A Response To Pro-Fluoridation Claims
    • World-Wide Alliance One-Pager
  • FAN.tv
  • Donate


fluoridealert.org

home // News // Fluoride: still not convinced //

Fluoride: still not convinced

Source: Cambridge News | September 1st, 2022 | By Mary Anne Gill
Location: New Zealand

Confusion over why the Ministry of Health chose Waipa as one of the first districts ordered to add fluoride to its water supply, has been reflected in candidates’ responses to The News’ survey.

Ten respondents were against adding fluoride to the Cambridge water supply and nine were in favour.

But nine were unsure including mayoral candidates Jim Mylchreest and Susan O’Regan, reflecting the lack of information provided by public health officials. The other two vying for the mayoral seat – Chris Woodhams and Bernard Westerbaan – were against community water fluoridation.

Jim Mylchreest

Susan O’Regan

Bernard Westerbaan

Chris Woodhams

8.45am 1 September, 2022

Update to earlier story. Te Whatu Ora (Health New Zealand) Waikato has provided caries data for Waipa Fluoride figures – Waipa [or here]

6am 1 September, 2022

Despite ongoing attempts by The News, neither the former Waikato District Health Board (DHB) nor the Health ministry (now Te Whatu Ora) could justify the Waipa decision based on tooth decay rates.

The figures were unavailable with two excuses given as to why – the cyber-attack on Waikato DHB’s computer systems last year and Covid-19.

The nationwide 2020 data included all regions, except Waikato, because the DHB was unable to run quality assurance checks on the data as a consequence of the attack on its computers. Confirmed figures are unlikely to be available until November.

The latest Waipa stats are from 2015 and showed 8 in 1000 children aged from 0-14 years had been hospitalised for dental-related admissions and that tooth decay rates were twice as high in Maori children than in non-Maori.

Reporting after that put Waipa into a greater Hamilton locality which, in 2019, lumped Cambridge in with nearly two thirds of the sprawling Waikato DHB region.

Those figures showed 55 per cent of children were decay free when seen by oral health services at five years old.

Waikato was below the national average of 59 per cent and behind other regions like Auckland, Taranaki, Hawke’s Bay, Whanganui, Hutt Valley, Wellington and Canterbury but ahead of Northland, Rotorua and Counties-Manukau.

Yet even without Waipa figures former director-general of health Ashley Bloomfield, as his parting gift, ordered the district to add fluoride to the Cambridge water supply.

He was able to do that under sweeping powers granted under the Health (Fluoridation of Drinking Water) Act passed in Parliament in November last year with cross political party support.

Seven Waipa candidates – Ruth Nicholls, Woodhams, James Parlane, Takena Stirling, Westerbaan, Delwyn Smith and Corilin Steel – said they thought the district could push back on Bloomfield’s decision.

Four – Jo Davies-Colley, Selina Oliver, Norris Hall and Elise Badger – were unsure. The rest said there was nothing the council could do.

Diana Aquilina

Legal advice provided by Diana Aquilina, the council’s in-house counsel, said the council had no choice.

“It’s a criminal offence for the council not to comply with the direction. It’s also not within council’s powers not to fluoridate,” she told councillors last month.

Waipa’s water has never been fluoridated since its introduction into New Zealand in 1954 – nor seriously debated by Waipa District Council or the Te Awamutu and Cambridge Borough councils.

 

How the candidates called it:

  • For fluoride: Sue Milner, Andrew Myers, Andrew Brown, Jo Davies-Colley, Philip Coles, Alana Mackay, Corilin Steel, Mike Montgomerie, David Slone.
  • Against: Ruth Nicholls, Jill Taylor, Chris Woodhams, James Parlane, Takena Stirling, Bernard Westerbaan, Delwyn Smith, Clare St Pierre, Bernie Fynn, Bruce Thomas.
  • Unsure: Susan O’Regan, Jim Mylchreest, Roger Gordon, Lou Brown, Liz Stolwyk, Selina Oliver, Norris Hall, Elise Badger, Marcus Gower.

*Original article online at https://www.cambridgenews.nz/2022/09/fluoride-still-not-convinced/

 

 

 

Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

fan newsletter

Sign up for our free newsletter for updates on the latest fluoride developments.

quick facts

  • 97% of western Europe has rejected water fluoridation

  • Many children now exceed recommended daily fluoride intake from toothpaste alone.

  • Fluoride is not a nutrient.

  • 64 studies have linked fluoride with reduced IQ in children.

    • Related Videos:

    • Crippling Waters

      Crippling Waters

    • Professional Perspectives on Water Fluoridation

      Professional Perspectives on Water Fluoridation

    • Don't Swallow Your Toothpaste

      Don't Swallow Your Toothpaste

    • Related Articles:

    • The Absurdities of Water Fluoridation

      [caption id="attachment_10205" align="alignleft" width="190"] Paul Connett, PhD[/caption] Water fluoridation is a peculiarly American phenomenon. It started at a time when Asbestos lined our pipes, lead was added to gasoline, PCBs filled our transformers and DDT was deemed so "safe and effective" that officials felt no qualms spraying kids in school classrooms

    • Why I am now officially opposed to adding fluoride to drinking water

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iF-hKlIgCuM April, 2000 To whom it may concern: Since April of 1999, I have publicly decried the addition of fluoride, especially hydrofluosilicic acid, to drinking water for the purpose of preventing tooth decay. The following summarize my reasons. New evidence for lack of effectiveness of fluoridation in modern times. [caption id="attachment_10211" align="alignleft" width="150"] Dr. Hardy

    • 50 Reasons to Oppose Fluoridation

      Introduction [caption id="attachment_11821" align="alignleft" width="200"] Dr. Paul Connett[/caption] In Europe, only Ireland (73%), Poland (1%), Serbia (3%), Spain (11%), and the U.K. (11%) fluoridate any of their water. Most developed countries, including Japan and 97% of the western European population, do not consume fluoridated water. In the U.S., about 70% of public water supplies are

    • Related Studies:

    • Fluoride & IQ: 76 Studies

      • As of July 18, 2022, a total of 85 human studies have investigated the relationship between fluoride and human intelligence. • Of these investigations, 76 studies have reported that elevated fluoride exposure is associated with reduced IQ in humans. • The studies which reported an association of reduced IQ with exposure

    • Fluoride's Effect on Fetal Brain

      The human placenta does not prevent the passage of fluoride from a pregnant mother's bloodstream to the fetus. As a result, a fetus can be harmed by fluoride ingested pregnancy. Based on research from China, the fetal brain is one of the organs susceptible to fluoride poisoning. As highlighted by the excerpts

    • Fluoride: Developmental Neurotoxicity.

      Developmental Neurotoxicity There has been a tremendous amount of research done on the association of exposure to fluoride with developmental neurotoxicity. There are over 60 studies reporting reduced IQ in children and several on the impaired learning/memory in animals. And there are studies which link fluoride to Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Teaching

    • Related Miscellaneous Content:

    • Email Exchange with FDA re: Fluoride Supplements

      Email exchange regarding FDA's reasons for not approving fluoride supplements.

    • Harvard's Statement on Chester Douglass/Scientific Misconduct

      Statement Concerning the Outcome of the Review into Allegations of Research Misconduct Involving Fluoride Research BOSTON-August 15, 2006-The Harvard Medical School and School of Dental Medicine (HSDM) review of Chester Douglass, DMD, PhD, professor of oral health policy and epidemiology at HSDM, has concluded that Douglass did not intentionally omit, misrepresent,

    • The 'Altered Recommendations' of the 1983 Surgeon General's Panel

      "We believe that EPA staff and managers should be called to testify, along with members of the 1983 Surgeon Generals panel and officials of the Department of Human Services, to explain how the original recommendations of the Surgeon Generals panel were altered to allow EPA to set otherwise unjustifiable drinking water standards for fluoride."

  • New Visitors
  • Take Action
  • Researchers
    • Issues
    • FAN.tv
    • News
    • F.A.Q.
    • About FAN
  • Join Us
  • Donate
  • © Fluoride Action Network 2023. All Rights Reserved.