Research Studies
Study Tracker
The environmental impact of community caries prevention – part 3: water fluoridation.
| British Dental Journal | Duane B, Lyne A, Parle R, Ashley P. | 233:303–307
Authors and Affiliations Dental Public Health, Dublin Dental Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, D02 F859, Ireland Brett Duane Paediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Rockefeller, 21 University Street, London, WC1E 6DE, UK Alexandra Lyne & Paul Ashley Environmental Health Service National Water Operational Unit, Health Service Executive, Community Services Centre, Western Road, Clonmel, County Tipperary, E91 HT96, Ireland References UK Governm

Abstract

Key points

  • This paper is the final part of a three-part series looking at the environmental impact of different community-level caries prevention programmes.
  • This paper quantifies the environmental impact of water fluoridation and compares it to results from part one (fluoride varnish application) and part two (toothbrushing programmes).
  • This paper suggests how sustainability data can be used alongside clinical and cost effectiveness to make decisions about prevention at a population level.

Introduction Community-level interventions for the prevention of dental caries in children include fluoride varnish in schools, supervised toothbrushing in schools, the provision of toothbrushes and toothpaste and water fluoridation. The environmental impact of these interventions is an important factor to consider when commissioning these services.

Materials and methods A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted to quantify the environmental impact of fluoridation of the public water supply for a five-year-old child over a one-year period. These results were compared to LCA data for fluoride varnish in schools, supervised toothbrushing and the provision of toothbrushes and toothpaste.

Results When comparing community-level caries prevention programmes, water fluoridation had the lowest environmental impact in all 16 categories and had the lowest disability-adjusted life years impact.

Discussion All community-level caries prevention programmes have an associated environmental cost. Water fluoridation performed well in this LCA study in all measures of environmental sustainability. The results of this study could be used, along with cost and clinical effectiveness data, to inform public healthcare policy.

*Original abstract online at https://www.nature.com/articles/s41415-022-4251-5

 

Excerpt:

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dental Public Health, Dublin Dental Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, D02 F859, Ireland

    Brett Duane

  2. Paediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, Rockefeller, 21 University Street, London, WC1E 6DE, UK

    Alexandra Lyne & Paul Ashley

  3. Environmental Health Service National Water Operational Unit, Health Service Executive, Community Services Centre, Western Road, Clonmel, County Tipperary, E91 HT96, Ireland

References

  1. UK Government. Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention. 2021. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/delivering-better-oral-health-an-evidence-based-toolkit-for-prevention (accessed September 2021).

  2. Centre for Disease Control. Ten Great Public Health Achievements – United States, 1900-1999. 2001. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00056796.htm (accessed October 2021).

  3. Iheozor-Ejiofor Z, Worthington H V, Walsh T et al. Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015, DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010856.pub2.

  4. Health and Safety Executive. Fluoridation – FAQs. 2021. Available at https://www.hse.ie/eng/services/list/1/environ/fluoridation—faqs-1-.pdf (accessed October 2021).

  5. Citizens Information. Census of population. 2016. Available at https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/government_in_ireland/national_government/copy_of_census.html (accessed October 2021).

  6. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14001: 2015 Environmental management systems – Requirements with guidance for use. 2015. Available at https://www.iso.org/standard/60857.html (accessed September 2021).

  7. European Commission. Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules Guidance. 2018. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/smgp/pdf/PEFCR_guidance_v6.3.pdf (accessed September 2021).

  8. UK Government. Improving the oral health of children: cost effective commissioning. 2016. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/improving-the-oral-health-of-children-cost-effective-commissioning (accessed October 2021).

  9. The Irish Expert Body on Fluorides and Health. What is the cost of water fluoridation? 2021. Available at https://www.fluoridesandhealth.ie/faqs/#:~:text=In%20Ireland%2C%20around%20%E2%82%AC5.0,at%20Water%20Treatment%20Plants%20annually.&text=1%20%22Water%20Fluoridation%20Cost%20%E2%82%AC,M%20Last%20Year%20%E2%80%94%20Doh%22 (accessed September 2021).

  10. Google. Search for ‘water fluoridation is bad for the environment’. 2021. Available at https://www.google.com/search?sxsrf=AOaemvIfZg2-fbG0FMfuyh-YIuKONRyI5A:163354water+fluoridation+is+bad+for+the+environment&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiHvavwqLbzAhXQilwKHRHgASIQgwN6BAgBEAE&biw=1440&bih=764&dpr=2 (accessed October 2021).

Related Research Studies